Woman Criminally Charged for Defending Herself Against Violent, Attacking BLM

[Rigby5]

I don't know what the hell you're looking at. What I see is people trying to stop her and pull her doors open. In Ohio that's covered under our Castle Doctrine. Trying to break into my car is no different than trying to break into my home. I have the legal right to use deadly force.

There are 4 different videos, but the first one has her deliberately hitting, (but not hard), a demonstrator waking in the middle of the street, and she can see there many dozens more ahead of her.
So she should have stopped and turned off. Instead she not only continues, but picks up speed, and it is only then that her car is attacked.

 

[westwall]

The lead up is she pulls up, loser stands in her way like an insurance frauditor, she hits him and keeps going.

But what came before that? There is more video that hasn't been released.

 

[westwall]

Defending someone who used their car as a deadly weapon................what a surprise.

Defending violent rioters. No surprise there.

 

[Lisa558]

I don't know what the hell you're looking at. What I see is people trying to stop her and pull her doors open. In Ohio that's covered under our Castle Doctrine. Trying to break into my car is no different than trying to break into my home. I have the legal right to use deadly force.

You notice how the leftists take the dangerous BLM side? These a-holes shouldn’t be in the street in the first place. Everyone has been far too lenient on them for years, so they feel emboldened to do this type of thing.

And believe me, I know what it feels like. I was lost in the wrong part of DC - a poor, all-black area where they just automatically hate a white person if they spot one - and the animals were banging on my car and trying to block my way too. The only difference is that I drove slowly through and got away with no harm done.

 

[Rigby5]

Everyone in the video is dressed the same. Mass riots by rioters all dressed the same. ALL committing violence.

I don't see a single victim in your video.

Wrong.
Temporarily blocking a street for a peaceful protest is legal and protected.
The driver could have taken alternative streets once they saw the blockage ahead of them.
They did not have the right to plow through them instead.

 

[Rigby5]

Defending violent rioters. No surprise there.

There was no violence from the protestors until after the car became violent and harmful.

 

[Lisa558]

But what came before that? There is more video that hasn't been released.

I saw an earlier video showing the lead up a couple of days ago on the news, but I can’t find it online. She was surrounded by the thugs and they were pounding on her car. She was obviously scared shitless.

 

[Indeependent]

She is the initial instigator, committing battery. Thats blows self defense out in most states as you cannot be the instigator of the action and then claim self defense.


Another perspective: The number of unseeing pedestrians hit is substantial:

Bunch of punks.
If I did that in Nassau County even the normal Blacks would applaud.

 

[martybegan]

And still no video of what caused her to flee

Funny that.

Not

Progs are known to only record the after effects of their thuggishness, not their actual thuggishness.

 

[westwall]

Wrong.
Temporarily blocking a street for a peaceful protest is legal and protected.
The driver could have taken alternative streets once they saw the blockage ahead of them.
They did not have the right to plow through them instead.

No, it isn't. You may NOT block travel, nor may you attack cars on the street.

 

[BS Filter]

I'm cleaning my guns.

 

[bodecea]

Yea. That's what self defense looks like...

She must have an R after her name. They will make her a hero/martyr.

 

[Rigby5]

You notice how the leftists take the dangerous BLM side? These a-holes shouldn’t be in the street in the first place. Everyone has been far to lenient on them for years, so they feel emboldened to do this type of thing.

And believe me, I know what it feels like. I was lost in the wrong part of DC - a poor, all-black area where they just automatically hate a white person if they spot one - and the animals were banging on my car and trying to block my way too. The only difference is that I drove slowly through and got away with no harm done.

And this woman could also have just slowed down, turned off, etc.
There was no excuse for accelerating.
The people she hit and injured did not even see her coming, since she hit them from behind.
The protestors DO have the right to temporarily block traffic.
It is a 1st amendment right, as long as not persistent.
It does not matter what issue they are protesting about.
However, police brutality IS a valid complaint.

 

[Indeependent]

There are 4 different videos, but the first one has her deliberately hitting, (but not hard), a demonstrator waking in the middle of the street, and she can see there many dozens more ahead of her.
So she should have stopped and turned off. Instead she not only continues, but picks up speed, and it is only then that her car is attacked.

Turned off where?

 

[westwall]

There was no violence from the protestors until after the car became violent and harmful.

If you are part of a group that is rioting, you get what you deserve.

 

[westwall]

And this woman could also have just slowed down, turned off, etc.
There was no excuse for accelerating.
The people she hit and injured did not even see her coming, since she hit them from behind.
The protestors DO have the right to temporarily block traffic.
It is a 1st amendment right, as long as not persistent.
It does not matter what issue they are protesting about.
However, police brutality IS a valid complaint.

No, she couldn't. She was surrounded by violent rioters.

 

[bodecea]

And still no video of what caused her to flee

Funny that.

Not

Did you defend the Charlottesville hit n'runner too?

 

[westwall]

Did you defend the Charlottesville hit n'runner too?

No, I didn't. You ignorant toad.

 

[bodecea]

No, she couldn't. She was surrounded by violent rioters.

"violent rioters"? Who did THEY hurt? What businesses did they damage? How many of THEM were arrested for "violent rioting"?

 

[bodecea]

No, I didn't. You ignorant toad.

Well, even an ancient stopped grandfather clock is right twice a day, eh?