danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #201
I understand it better than you.You don't understand what at will employment means.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I understand it better than you.You don't understand what at will employment means.
I don't think so.I understand it better than you.
Employment is at the will of either party. Anyone can be bought under Capitalism. Thus, underpayment is the cause.No it doesn't.
LAziness causes that
I don't think right-wingers care about debate only their hypocrisy.I don't think so.
You've never employed anyone and I don't think you ever had a job.
No it is at the will of BOTH parties simultaneously.Employment is at the will of either party. Anyone can be bought under Capitalism. Thus, underpayment is the cause.
Only if you appeal to ignorance of at-will employment laws for any public policies based on previous condition of employment instead of servitude.
I'm not a right winger, whatever that means to you.I don't think right-wingers care about debate only their hypocrisy.
Not the point at all, right-winger. It is about why people are panhandling instead of applying for a job. Underpayment causes that.
lol. That is what employment at the will of either party means. Anyone can be bought under Capitalism. Underpayment makes that less likely not laziness.No it is at the will of BOTH parties simultaneously.
You can't force an employer to hire you and an employer can't force you to work for him.
The the will of either individual is irrelevant unless both come to an agreement on employment.
How so? Are you claiming no one can be bought under Capitalism?Even if that were the case, it has no bearing on my correcting your statement that there is no unemployment only underpayment. That statement is blatantly wrong.
Not in any at-will employment State. Only those who are ignorant of the law say what you do.
How so? Are you claiming no one can be bought under Capitalism?
No if it was at the will of either party individually then you could force an employer to hire you.lol. That is what employment at the will of either party means. Anyone can be bought under Capitalism. Underpayment makes that less likely not laziness.
That is not what employment at the will of either party means. At-will employment depends on mutual agreement.No if it was at the will of either party individually then you could force an employer to hire you.
The will of both people have to align simultaneously ( that meas at the same time in the same place)
I'm not a right winger, whatever that means to you.
I don't vote for republicans or democrats either
Why, because they are probably discriminated against when trying to get a job.Panhandling: How Much Money Do Panhandlers Make? Can It Even Make Money?
US job openings surge to record 9.3 million in April
There are quite a few panhandlers that i see day to day. I have decided to make a new sign for when i pass them.
THERE ARE 9.1 MILLION JOB OPENINGS
IN JOE BIDEN'S ECONOMY!
WHY DONT YOU QUIT
BEING A PANHANDLER AND GET A JOB
WHERE YOU CAN MAKE
SOMETHING OF
YOURSELF?
That is not what employment at the will of either party means. At-will employment depends on mutual agreement.
Employment is at the will of either party. Anyone can be bought under Capitalism. Thus, underpayment is the cause.
You should file and get a refund of earned income credit to add to the panhandling income.Bwaaaaahhhhaaaa...Do you really think someone who panhandles is filing? Many times these people live off the grid...
Being called a right-winger is an ad hominem? You tried to claim I was a sociopath in another thread. Who is worse, hypocrite?Yeah, daniel calls everyone who disagrees with him "rightwinger". He continually talks about posting the fewest fallacies, but posts tons of ad hominem fallacies.