CDZ With 9.3 million job openings in the United States, why are there still people panhandling on the corner of Intersections?

[Papageorgio]

Got rid of St Trumpy for us.

Nothing like going from dumb to dumber. We need better people to run for office, the last several elections we have put up some really bad candidates.

 

[Blues Man]

No one is suggesting I get paid to not work. The compensation is for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment in an at-will employment State.

You should refuse to complain without getting paid for it.

That's exactly what you want.

You want anyone who is not working to get paid especially you

 

[danielpalos]

That's exactly what you want.

You want anyone who is not working to get paid especially you

You are not getting paid to complain. Why do you do it for free?

 

[Blues Man]

You are not getting paid to complain. Why do you do it for free?

Because it's not a job.

You're not getting paid to take a shit why do it for free?

 

[danielpalos]

Because it's not a job.

You're not getting paid to take a shit why do it for free?

There is no requirement to work in an at-will employment State. And, you have no morals; why complain about others? Just quit and go on unemployment compensation if you can't handle the work ethic.

Or, just get a better job because minimum wage jobs are not meant to build moral fortitude.

 

[Blues Man]

There is no requirement to work in an at-will employment State. And, you have no morals; why complain about others? Just quit and go on unemployment compensation if you can't handle the work ethic.

Or, just get a better job because minimum wage jobs are not meant to build moral fortitude.

I already said that you don't have to work if you don't want to

But don't expect to get paid for not working.

Hell you can live on the street and panhandle for all I care

 

[danielpalos]

I already said that you don't have to work if you don't want to

But don't expect to get paid for not working.

Hell you can live on the street and panhandle for all I care

Employment is at the will of either party for unemployment compensation as well; current repugnant laws to the contrary not with standing.

 

[Blues Man]

Employment is at the will of either party for unemployment compensation as well; current repugnant laws to the contrary not with standing.

You only get unemployment compensation if you were employed and then lost a job.

This is the way the world works so just grow up and accept it or move out to the wilderness and live in a cave.

 

[danielpalos]

You only get unemployment compensation if you were employed and then lost a job.

This is the way the world works so just grow up and accept it or move out to the wilderness and live in a cave.

Black codes used to work the same way. Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about the law. Ignorance is what y'all do best.

 

[Blues Man]

Black codes used to work the same way. Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about the law. Ignorance is what y'all do best.

So now you're Black and being denied a job because of it?

And I'm not "right wing" whatever that means to you.

 

[MizMolly]

There will always be a portion of the population who refuse to work

I have seen panhandlers outside stores with help wanted signs in the windows.

 

[danielpalos]

I have seen panhandlers outside stores with help wanted signs in the windows.

Under Capitalism where anyone can be bought, there is no unemployment only underpayment.

 

[WinterBorn]

Employment is at the will of either party for unemployment compensation as well; current repugnant laws to the contrary not with standing.

This again? No daniel, unemployment laws are not repugnant to any at will employment laws. You are still free to quit. You just don't get unemployment assistance for doing it.

 

[WinterBorn]

Under Capitalism where anyone can be bought, there is no unemployment only underpayment.

This is nonsense. Of course there is unemployment. And there is underpayment. Being paid too little for your job is underpayment. But...and this is important...you HAVE a job. Unemployment is when you have no job.

 

[WinterBorn]

Employment is at the will of either party for unemployment compensation as well; current repugnant laws to the contrary not with standing.

I'll tell you what is repugnant. An apparently healthy young man refusing to get a job is slightly repugnant. An apparently healthy young man refusing to get a job and demanding that tax payers give him money is repugnant. And since you have complained, at length, about the means testing for welfare, you obviously have enough to live on. An apparently healthy young man refusing to get a job and demanding that tax payers give him money that he wants but does not need is beyond repugnant.

Daniel, you have complained, at length, about the means testing for welfare. Which means you have investigated welfare as a means of getting money. You claim you have a lawsuit in the CA courts claiming Unemployment Compensation is in violation of the Equal Protection Clause. If that is true (I have my doubts) then you will have had to research the Unemployment System. So you have put considerable effort into scamming the tax payers for money. And not money to live on, since you obviously have that. You are scamming for extra spending money. That goes beyond repugnant and into disgusting.

 

[danielpalos]

This again? No daniel, unemployment laws are not repugnant to any at will employment laws. You are still free to quit. You just don't get unemployment assistance for doing it.

Only if you appeal to ignorance of at-will employment laws for any public policies based on previous condition of employment instead of servitude.

 

[danielpalos]

This is nonsense. Of course there is unemployment. And there is underpayment. Being paid too little for your job is underpayment. But...and this is important...you HAVE a job. Unemployment is when you have no job.

Not the point at all, right-winger. It is about why people are panhandling instead of applying for a job. Underpayment causes that.

 

[Blues Man]

Only if you appeal to ignorance of at-will employment laws for any public policies based on previous condition of employment instead of servitude.

You don't understand what at will employment means.

 

[danielpalos]

I'll tell you what is repugnant. An apparently healthy young man refusing to get a job is slightly repugnant.

Not in any at-will employment State. Only those who are ignorant of the law say what you do.

 

[Blues Man]

Not the point at all, right-winger. It is about why people are panhandling instead of applying for a job. Underpayment causes that.

No it doesn't.

LAziness causes that