Wind Power vs Nuclear Power

And wind turbans won't ever make you glow in the dark.
You can make a bundle off wind turbans, without the regulation. Just ask them in Texas.
How can one ask when the Power is down?
 
You do need nuclear power to make wind turbines, you cant make a nuclear power plant with wind turbines
Once nuclear fusion is up and running, all these silly turbines and solar panels will be destined for the scrap heap.
 
Midpoint-mortality-estimates-for-birds_-GRAPH.png
Birds, okay, now try with lets say, Bald Eagles which is the birds getting killed.

How many bald eagles do cats kills? ZERO

How many hawks do cats kill, ZERO

How many bats do birds kill, ZERO

Windmills are killing Eagles and birds by the thousands.

How many birds killed by cats every single place a wind mill stands, ZERO!

Morons
 
Is there a comparison? I can try.
How many wind turbines would it take to destroy Nagasaki or Hiroshima?

Or, what if we compare ships?


View attachment 1164787
Or
View attachment 1164788
Which is better to transport LNG?
Well, internet search states -

....between 300 and over 800 average-sized wind turbines to match the actual energy output of a 900-megawatt nuclear plant. This is because a nuclear plant provides a constant power output, while a wind turbine's output varies with the wind speed.

It's a no brainer, nuclear is the way forward, turbines are merely an embarrassment blip in human history.
 
Turbans? Are you confusing Texas with the Middle East?
Heard of EPIC city? How's about the muslums in major Texas cities telling vendors if they do not go halal, then their business will be blocked with protestors. That means no alcohol, lottery, pork.
 
Well, internet search states -

....between 300 and over 800 average-sized wind turbines to match the actual energy output of a 900-megawatt nuclear plant. This is because a nuclear plant provides a constant power output, while a wind turbine's output varies with the wind speed.

It's a no brainer, nuclear is the way forward, turbines are merely an embarrassment blip in human history.
The internet does not include the capacity factor. The technical output is not the same as actual output. The capacity factor is about 20%

You need 4000 wind turbines once the capacity factor is calculated.

Nuclear power plants run at least 50 years so every ten years those wind turbines get replaced.

20,000 wind turbines are needed to replace one nuclear reactor.

Of course you still need the nuclear reactor to provide power so that the wind turbines can still be "operational" when there is no wind. Wind turbines need constant electricity while not operating,. To keep the computer, the radio, and to slowly spin the turbine so the bearings dont get a flat spot with 75 tons of turbine blades sitting on em

Then of course we still need a nuclear power plant to run the chemical industry that makes wind turbines.

Wind turbines are mostly all chemicals. Toxic at that.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom