GotZoom
Senior Member
I smell payoff.
New Jaguars and beach houses for each member of the jury.
New Jaguars and beach houses for each member of the jury.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
archangel said:Michael is definetly WEIRD...but the case presented just did not support the facts...speaking from a former law enforcement officer...sorry! :huh:
Bonnie said:What about the youth minister who testified? I think he would be very credible.
no1tovote4 said:1. Conspiracy - Not guilty.
2. Lewd Act - Not guilty.
3. Lewd Act - Not guilty.
4. Lewd Act - Not guilty.
5. Lewd Act - Not Guilty.
6. Attempting Lewd Act - Not guilty.
7. Administering Intox agent - Not guilty.
Lesser - Not guilty - providing intox bev to minors.
8. Administering Intox agent to assist in commission of felony - Not guilty.
Lesser - Not guilty - providing alcoholic bev to people under 21.
9. Administering Intox agent - Not quilty.
Lesser - Not guilty - providing alcohol to persons under 21.
10. Administering Intox agent - Not guilty.
Lesser - Not guilty - providing alcohol to persons under 21.
Damn, not guilty on all counts.
Bonnie said:The real stunner was just said by juror number 9 I think who when asked out of 149 witnesses were any deemed credible, to which she replied the telephone people( then they all laughed), and the house maid for Jackson???
So essentially 147 witnesses were not credible???
archangel said:Thats what I have been trying to say all along....some in here go on emotion rather than fact...![]()
Bonnie said:Okay logically how is it possible for 149 people to not be credible, and be dismissed so cavalierly???
then again on the other hand, jsut because he was found not guilty doesnt mean he didnt do it.archangel said:Of the quote"149" witnesses dismissed...how many could actually have been "a real time witness"...for the most part the prosecution relied on these witnesses...who were dismissed former employees...or former litigants...I personally would not have used such witnesses as they can and for the most part be dismissed as not credible...too close to the case...and having personal issues...I still not believe Michael Jackson was guility of the most heineous charges...then again maybe supported by credible witness testimony... the charge of contributing to the deliquency of a minor could have been supported...this is based on my assessment of testimony of the chartered flight attendants...the rest had way too many issues relating to personal gain...yes he is weird and socially immature...this does not make one guilty of the charges submitted....![]()
Johnney said:then again on the other hand, jsut because he was found not guilty doesnt mean he didnt do it.
imo, it jsut goes to show if you have money you can screw or kill who you want and get away with it.
Johnney said:i prefer to trust a gut instinct over anything. facts can be tampered with
archangel said:You have your opinion....I have mine...mine is more in line with a jury of twelve...i'ts over move on!![]()
I rise my hand and shout..Hey, my wife is a local attorney and a Judge here, YOU don't want me!manu1959 said:ever been on a jury...not sure i would be proud to align myself with a bunch of people too stupid to get out of it
Mr. P said:I rise my hand and shout..Hey, my wife is a local attorney and a Judge here, YOU don't want me!
It didn't work....
PS...it's almost impossible to get out of it in Georgia now. You better be in the hospital or
near death.
Hummmmm...may work..May get a contempt charge...heck it's worth a try...manu1959 said:i always say..............my dad is a criminal defense attorney and he always taught me.........the police don't arrest innocent people
archangel said:I prefer to trust God....and base mine on facts not emotion...![]()