Will Liberal Jews ever admit that calls to genocide Israelis are linked to violence against American Jews?
- Thread starter Lisa558
- Start date
Is this oblivious ignorance or actual ignorance? Too, it's amusing to see which countries have not run a mile from this offer. Anyway, not that it will penetrate the Chumpian bubble-
a)
The US President is authorised to invade The Hague if any Israeli is held by the ICC
On Monday, 20 May, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Karim Khan, announced that his office is seeking arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister, Yoav Galla…
www.middleeastmonitor.com
Just a few weeks after the creation of the ICC, the US Congress passed what is officially known as American Service-Members’ Protection Act. While aiming to protect serving military and political appointees, the Act gives the president wide ranges of powers to achieve that goal. It authorises him to use any means available to “release” any detained or imprisoned person “by, on behalf of, or at the request” of the ICC.
Clause b. of section 2008 of the Act defines what is called “covered persons” to include all US citizens acting for the US government and any individuals acting for any allied government, like NATO member states, for example. However, section 2013 of the Act widens that definition to include what the Act calls a “major non-NATO ally” naming, as examples, Australia, Egypt, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Argentina, the Republic of Korea and New Zealand. All military personnel and government officials from these countries are eligible for US help against the ICC, upon request. They lose such assistance once their own countries join the Court.
b) When the US vetoed resolutions in the UN and supplied Israel with genocide material.
Last edited:
Yawn. One can see the effect of truth on MAGAts. Even court judgements won't let them know genocide is wrong.
Oh well.
It is clear that the USA does not trust the ICC----what is GENOCIDE MATERIAL currently---Is this oblivious ignorance or actual ignorance? Too, it's amusing to see which countries have not run a mile from this offer. Anyway, not that it will penetrate the Chumpian bubble-
a)
The US President is authorised to invade The Hague if any Israeli is held by the ICC
On Monday, 20 May, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Karim Khan, announced that his office is seeking arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister, Yoav Galla…Just a few weeks after the creation of the ICC, the US Congress passed what is officially known as American Service-Members’ Protection Act. While aiming to protect serving military and political appointees, the Act gives the president wide ranges of powers to achieve that goal. It authorises him to use any means available to “release” any detained or imprisoned person “by, on behalf of, or at the request” of the ICC.Clause b. of section 2008 of the Act defines what is called “covered persons” to include all US citizens acting for the US government and any individuals acting for any allied government, like NATO member states, for example. However, section 2013 of the Act widens that definition to include what the Act calls a “major non-NATO ally” naming, as examples, Australia, Egypt, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Argentina, the Republic of Korea and New Zealand. All military personnel and government officials from these countries are eligible for US help against the ICC, upon request. They lose such assistance once their own countries join the Court.b) When the US vetoed resolutions in the UN and supplied Israel with genocide material.
other than Shariah law?
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 52,612
- 38,642
- 3,545
I think historically American Jews have seen White Christian Republicans as the more immediate threat.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 52,612
- 38,642
- 3,545
The fact that no one is for it.
And will Gaza it without hesitation if it feels an Israeli is threatened by it.
I think your current replies show you realise Israel is a pariah nation in the civilised world.
Nothing can inform invincible ignorance when it wants to deflect from discomfort at the meaning of 'any means available'.
I'm shocked.
Didn't you like that piece of US legislation? Don't you know what
what are you calling "the civilized world" ? There is no question that the two extant
"cultures" which are, historically, responsible for HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS murdered in
the name of their "religions"---to wit the christian world since its unfortunate inception ,
deprecated jews and the muslim world since AND COUNTING. What is your point?
- Thread starter
- #76
By “civilized,” he means countries without many Jews. Like England and France, with all their antidemitic violence and riots, courtesy of the Muslim invasion.
there are so many SECRETS in the "holy books"-----being an avid reader as a kid, I read lots of them.
I found out that the talmud does not contain a secret formula for transforming base metals into
gold-----BUT there are lines in both the koran and the NT that muslims and christians have, historically
interpreted as a license to kill jews. ----Christians, recently, repudiated the idea although the idea does
linger in the minds of a few----Muslims have never repudiated the "KILL THE JEW" directive of the koran
Zincwarrior
Diamond Member
To the OP. Have you tried to ask some?
- Thread starter
- #79
The liberal Jews continue to be in denial. And yes, I’ve spoken with them.
Zincwarrior
Diamond Member
What do they say as their reasons for / against?
Similar threads
- Locked
