Wildfires in March, 2026

No, you did not dispute them, you just posted how you didn't give a damn about people losing their homes and lively hoods. And now we are seeing a major weather change, from wind chills in the minus degrees to 87 degrees Friday. But just normal weather, right? And the drought went from 9% of Nebraska in October to over 80% at present. Ah well, just sit back and enjoy the sight of those ranchers and farmers losing everything. A true Trumpanzee.
Can you control lightning fires? We can't stop them.
 
Over 700,000 acres currently burning in Nebraska, many fires in other states, in spite of the cold in many of them. Is this a preview of the summer? This fire map shows what is going on with the fires right now;

So called WildFires have been a standard weapon thatDeep State has used many times over the last few years .
Anything which could have wider later effects on supply and distribution networks should always be taken very seriously by non Sheeple .
 
Another expert in half truths that are nothing but fancy lies. Yes, fewer individual fires but much more land burned;

Increase​

The increase in area burned by wildfires in North America over the last 20 years has been significant. Here are some key points:





The increase in fires globally is 100% about too many humans consuming too much finite land based fresh water supplies while CO2 FRAUD misdiagnoses and blames "warming" that does not exist.


Funny, because if Earth was warming, which it is not, there would be LESS FIRES not more...


A warmer Earth is a WETTER Earth...


"During the Jurassic Period, the Earth's climate was much warmer and wetter than it is today."
 
Over 700,000 acres currently burning in Nebraska, many fires in other states, in spite of the cold in many of them. Is this a preview of the summer? This fire map shows what is going on with the fires right now;


Another normal (in geological terms) natural event that Old Rocks thinks requires us to give up our standard of living and our political freedoms to prevent "catastrophe"
 
Another normal (in geological terms) natural event that Old Rocks thinks requires us to give up our standard of living and our political freedoms to prevent "catastrophe"
My goodness, over 60% of we in the Pacific Northwest get our power from renewables. And the standard of living in the Pacific Northwest is higher than most of the rest of the nation. So why is our standard of living that high while we get most of our electricity from renewables? Could it be that you really don't know anything about the cost of various methods of generation?
 
Another normal (in geological terms) natural event that Old Rocks thinks requires us to give up our standard of living and our political freedoms to prevent "catastrophe"
The only people trying to curtail our political freedoms are the MAGAts that are pushing the SAVE act.
 
My goodness, over 60% of we in the Pacific Northwest get our power from renewables. And the standard of living in the Pacific Northwest is higher than most of the rest of the nation. So why is our standard of living that high while we get most of our electricity from renewables? Could it be that you really don't know anything about the cost of various methods of generation?

Most that is hydro, and some leftists want to remove many of the dams that give us hydro power. You can't play the old "push for solar/wind but use hydro as an argument" bullshit on me, poseur.
 
Can you control lightning fires? We can't stop them.
We cannot stop them when they have 30 mph to 70 mph winds behind them. In the lightning caused Canyon Creek Complex, south of John Day, Oregon, there were spot fires being caused be winds throwing burning branches 2 miles ahead of the fire front. I worked for the Forest Service in that area 50 years ago, and we had many lightning caused fires, but never had 50+ mph winds. When you get a steady wind at that speed, and a lighting fire, you cannot control it, especially in rough terrain. And that fire burned over 175 square miles of mostly wooded hillsides, and many homes in the area.
 
We cannot stop them when they have 30 mph to 70 mph winds behind them. In the lightning caused Canyon Creek Complex, south of John Day, Oregon, there were spot fires being caused be winds throwing burning branches 2 miles ahead of the fire front. I worked for the Forest Service in that area 50 years ago, and we had many lightning caused fires, but never had 50+ mph winds. When you get a steady wind at that speed, and a lighting fire, you cannot control it, especially in rough terrain. And that fire burned over 175 square miles of mostly wooded hillsides, and many homes in the area.
So, you can't stop lighting, can't stop winds, so you tell us that winds increased in what years?
 
15th post
the SAVE act does nothing of the sort. meanwhile you support ICE vehicle bans and pushing 15 minute tenament cities as sacrifices to your Marxist "god" Gaia.
The documents required and the attempt to end mail in ballots plus the attempt to terminate many women's voting because of marriage name change in the name of illegal voting that does not exist. This is the MAGAts and GOP response to the fact that polls show that the upcoming midterms will be a disaster for them because of the economy, war, and income inequality.

Why would I support a ban on ICE vehicles? As the batteries continue to get more energy dense and less costly, economics will eliminate them. $115 a barrel at the moment and still going up. Going to go up a lot more as Iran continues to destroy refineries in the Mid-east. The tenement cities are created by your Epstein billionaire class. And people like you will continue to kiss their asses even as they shit in your faces.
 
The documents required and the attempt to end mail in ballots plus the attempt to terminate many women's voting because of marriage name change in the name of illegal voting that does not exist. This is the MAGAts and GOP response to the fact that polls show that the upcoming midterms will be a disaster for them because of the economy, war, and income inequality.

Why would I support a ban on ICE vehicles? As the batteries continue to get more energy dense and less costly, economics will eliminate them. $115 a barrel at the moment and still going up. Going to go up a lot more as Iran continues to destroy refineries in the Mid-east. The tenement cities are created by your Epstein billionaire class. And people like you will continue to kiss their asses even as they shit in your faces.

The women voting thing is a lie. Do you also think women can have penises?

If economics will "handle it", again, why the need for these bullshit bans?

That "billionaire class" mostly votes democrat, and knows they will still be able to buy off the "eco-police" you watermelons will bring into existence.
 
What is wrong with Citizens voting and the save act guarantees they do get that right.
The SAVE is only to reduce the number of people voting, thereby, at least in their wet dreams, increasing the chance of the MAGAts and Trumpanzees retaining power. I think that between the Iran war and the economy, that is a vain hope. Never the less, that act should be rejected.
 
Back
Top Bottom