I'm revealing that despite being a good guy, you're a partisan like anyone else. You said "he clearly wants to do what is best for the State,"
What makes you say "clearly" especially since you two posts later say you find him reprehensible for his actions and wouldn't even vote for him?
I think that by saying this, you show your colors. That's all I'm saying.
No...
You did not see the post I was responding to....
he used the term CLEARLY when describing the guys intentions....so I used the word clearly showing how others can see it differently...
My mistake was using the word "I".....but you see...I know nothing about the guy....I have no idea what his agenda was...and neither does ANYONE who is not directly involved in the situation in Wisconsin....but whan I said "I" and "clearly" I was respinding to him saying the he knows the vhe guy "CLEARLY" had another agenda.
I bleive I have posted many a post that shows I am not partisan.....but now I have to watch exactly how I make a point...and assume people will take each pint at face value without looking at what I was responding to?
Not really necessary...and I thought you were above such BS.
It's the converse, actually. I thought
you were above such BS.
You seem to be an Oddball type lately, defending the clearly stupid/inane complaints against the left.....same ole' blah blah just a different day. Then another couple posts go against the right for good measure, ala Oddball.
I am above that BS. I don't choose sides, I only inject myself when a side is
obvious really, to point out the absurdity of this all. When it's not so obvious, it's usually just a matter of opinion ......and I can live with differing opinions. When it is obvious ..... there's clearly a purely partisan reasoning behind the conversation to begin with and the absurdity is there like red meat to be eaten.