Trump says the media is our enemy. I have personally called the media out thousands of times. But I want you to take time to learn how you are played by the media. IF you refuse to watch the video, they have already trapped you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump says the media is our enemy. I have personally called the media out thousands of times. But I want you to take time to learn how you are played by the media. IF you refuse to watch the video, they have already trapped you.
I watch for words such as Sources claim, how they describe Democrats vs Republicans, Headlines such as the first example she gave. Watching it does not mean all at one time. Nothing wrong with saving it for later.First, one needs to have a spare 40 minutes to watch, and especially if it's something we already know.
Next one should do a better job of filtering which 'media' will be your sources. Few media, MSM, are objective. Most have a bias leaning one way or another. Some require you to pay to 'view', the NY Times example she starts with is one of those.
Third, there is a broad range of news~entertainment systems within the blanket(broad-brush) classification of media.
All the above in consideration, I'll admit that most media are our to manipulate, but if one considers ALL media as "the enemy" and avoid such, how will one learn anything, have a clue regarding news and other essential information ?
Living in isolation isn't a good way for most people.
Trump says the media is our enemy. I have personally called the media out thousands of times. But I want you to take time to learn how you are played by the media. IF you refuse to watch the video, they have already trapped you.
I watched and listened to all of her talk and found she dialed it in correctly.First, one needs to have a spare 40 minutes to watch, and especially if it's something we already know.
Next one should do a better job of filtering which 'media' will be your sources. Few media, MSM, are objective. Most have a bias leaning one way or another. Some require you to pay to 'view', the NY Times example she starts with is one of those.
Third, there is a broad range of news~entertainment systems within the blanket(broad-brush) classification of media.
All the above in consideration, I'll admit that most media are our to manipulate, but if one considers ALL media as "the enemy" and avoid such, how will one learn anything, have a clue regarding news and other essential information ?
Living in isolation isn't a good way for most people.
So you use clickbait.Lol! Next time double dog dare me to watch your clickbait.
She said that in 1 minutes she could demonstrate media manipulation. She used the NY Times as her source, which is basically shooting fish in a barrel.So you use clickbait.
I am not rating speakers on looks. She also used the Washington post and the Guardian. When those talk, they are setting you up as they don't give news, they give out opinion as to what the news is.She said that in 1 minutes she could demonstrate media manipulation. She used the NY Times as her source, which is basically shooting fish in a barrel.
If you watched nothing but CNN, you would be convinced that America is losing the Iran war, and not just losing, but getting our butts handed to us.
She is easy in the eyes though. It's not enough to give her more than that minute, but she made her point, so kudos.
You could say the same about Fox. If you watched nothing but that, you would think the Iran war was already won.I am not rating speakers on looks. She also used the Washington post and the Guardian. When those talk, they are setting you up as they don't give news, they give out opinion as to what the news is.
Notice that our press talks of the leaders of Iran as victims and ignores the story to be told that it is the public in Iran who are victims of the Muslims clerics.
The media doesn't direct any of my beliefs because my beliefs are built from graphable facts, not spin, semantics, nor slant.How the media directs your beliefs
Or you already know how psy-ops works. In the video, I did NOT conclude Israel and USA were the bad guys, because the spin does not work on me.IF you refuse to watch the video, they have already trapped you.
Magnificent.The media doesn't direct any of my beliefs because my beliefs are built from graphable facts, not spin, semantics, nor slant.
Or you already know how psy-ops works. In the video, I did NOT conclude Israel and USA were the bad guys, because the spin does not work on me.
I do watch FOX daily and notice it keeps showing Democrats points all day long.You could say the same about Fox. If you watched nothing but that, you would think the Iran war was already won.
Neither side seems capable of presenting the facts in a balanced manner.
The most destructive weapon in war has always been propaganda. It also is effective in civilian societies, for those that fall for it. Trust => verify.I watch for words such as Sources claim, how they describe Democrats vs Republicans, Headlines such as the first example she gave. Watching it does not mean all at one time. Nothing wrong with saving it for later.
General Tommy Franks proved the right way to win wars. But this time we are on the side of the population of Iran, having fights with Democrats on the side of the Muslim clerics.You could say the same about Fox. If you watched nothing but that, you would think the Iran war was already won.
Neither side seems capable of presenting the facts in a balanced manner.
That sums up her and my message. However, it has worked in peace time too.The most destructive weapon in war has always been propaganda. It also is effective in civilian societies, for those that fall for it. Trust => verify.
We are on the same page.I may watch it later but as already stated.....news really isn't 'just the facts Ma'am'.
We can blame whatever news or story source we want for manipulation of our views, but the real problem is with 'We The People' that don't bother questioning it or for seeing it for what it is.
Anytime a story includes MAYBE, WOULDA, SHOULDA, COULDA, etc......should alert the audience there is more to it and should be questioned. And of course those 'unnamed sources not wanting to be named because they are close to the matter'..........IOW, either they don't have any source and just making shit up as they go.........OR some jackass is blabbing his mouth knowing they'd get fired for doing so. Since there are so many such story sources......I'd go with the reporter making it up.
It works well, but not on me.That sums up her and my message. However, it has worked in peace time too.
Whoever Controls Language Controls Thought. Her Video Doesn't Mention That Subliminal Influence.The media doesn't don't direct any of my beliefs because my beliefs are built from graphable facts, not spin, semantics, nor slant.