Why Women Need Husbands

Nice way to twist my words.

No twist involved.

Sure, you'll back away and blow lots of smoke, but that is EXACTLY the position of your of the left, a mother is useless.

I never said a mother is useless, not once.

Being a stay at home parent is not an easy thing (as I have already said)

And pointless, as they have no useful skills - according to you of the left. The job of raising the next generation is one you view with contempt.

At least, it's one you believe should be done by government institutions, rather than by mothers dedicated to their children.

She has no useful skill outside of the home. Please tell me what she can do outside of the home if she went from high school, to being married for 20 years and raising children? A job that isnt minimum wage, that will provide for her and her children, god forbid soemthing happen to her husband.



What an absurd question. Those advocating that women need no husband, can have children without any support structure, living on government aid, asks what happens if the man is no longer there?

Was your purpose to be ironic?

I am not advocating single motherhood and doing it all alone. I am advocating people being independant and having a skill. Ya know, something where they DONT have to be on the government dime should something happen to the provider.


Actually, the vast majority of women with degrees get married before having children.

{One group still largely resists the trend: college graduates, who overwhelmingly marry before having children. That is turning family structure into a new class divide, with the economic and social rewards of marriage increasingly reserved for people with the most education. }

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/18/us/for-women-under-30-most-births-occur-outside-marriage.html?_r=0

The bullshit that single motherhood is the path to independence is sold to the least educated and most vulnerable in society.

I see this as calculated war on families by the left. While men are reviled and demeaned, women suffer more, and children suffer the most.

Hopefully she kept up with the changing world of her degree. If not, she starts from ground zero, degree or not. If she didnt have a degree, now she gets to try to find a job that isnt minimum wage so she can bring enough home to pay the bills and put food onthe table.

And no doubt this is all the fault of men...

Oh please, tell me where I said that.

Everyone should be raised to be independant. To be able to survive on their own if need be. Would a partner be great? yes, of course. But as someone said before...need and want are two different things.

Poverty tracks exactly with your goal of women who reject the family model.

The damage you do is immeasurable. Your war on the family is a war on our next generation.

lol..actually my daughter is growing up to be a very independant lady who will have a skill so she can support herself and make her own path in life. She hopefully will meet a man who will not be intimidated by her and who will work together with her to create a happy strong family.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bodey and seabitch need husbands, oops my bad they are husbands.
 
The article is absolutely true but if women want part time jobs and balanced lives, they should not vote dimocrap EVER - because dimocraps are TOXIC for the economy and in the bad economy part-time jobs disappear FIRST.

So all those Ivy League grads and highly educated women should look into their priorities in voting. They have a choice in their priorities to make - what is more important to them - a third-trimester abortion legal and contraceptives paid by taxpayer or be able to find a part-time job easily to balance work and family and to pay for the contraceptives themselves. And never have any need for an abortion.

Wait, it must be the liberul's fault.

LOL
 
Women are in the workforce because they are a cheaper source of labor for capitalists. Period. If women left the workforce, we would effectively have full employment and MUCH higher wages. This will never be allowed to happen in this economic system.

Why do you think we have such lax immigration policies? An excess supply of laborers means lower wages.
 
Whenever I bring up some of these topics 1 of 2 things always happen:

1. Women will say "Wow!" or "Really?" but never explain the reason for that reaction

or

2. Women will say "Not every woman" which is a dodge because you know everything doesn't apply to everyone
 
A provocative (perhaps) opinion piece, about which I imagine there are some opinions here.

Women, men, marriage, family, independence, technology, welfare, education.......it impacts many aspects of society.

Why women still need husbands | Fox News


"So why not let husbands bring home the bulk of the bacon so women can have the balanced lives they seek? ThereÂ’s no way to be a wife, a mother and a full-time employee and still create balance. But you can have balance by depending on a husband who works full-time and year-round.

I know what youÂ’re going to say. Where are these husbands on whom women can depend? And youÂ’re right: there are fewer men these days who seem eager to be primary breadwinners.

But ask yourself why, and I bet you know the answer."

Here's one comment I'd like to make. All high school students (generally speaking) are encouraged to go to college (male/female). After college, many students are $30-50k in debt.

To ask a man to make enough money to help cover his and her debt repayments for 20 years (potentially $60-$100k in total) in addition to all other living expenses is a tall order, don't you agree?

The moment the Establishment started encouraging all students, regardless of talent, motivation, skill, etc to "go to a 4 year college" is the moment this idea of a "primary breadwinner" went out the window.

We need to change this first.
 
The failure of the greed obsessed right to pay living wages and benefits has forced mothers to go out to work so your "holier than thou" allegations are nothing but partisan hypocrisy.

And yet, nothing in statistics about "mothers going out to work," only the rise of unwed motherhood - promoted by you leftists - with Diana1180 as the archetypical feminist telling homemakers that they have no value or "useful skills."

Your war on the family rages on, with children the casualties.
 
The failure of the greed obsessed right to pay living wages and benefits has forced mothers to go out to work so your "holier than thou" allegations are nothing but partisan hypocrisy.

And yet, nothing in statistics about "mothers going out to work," only the rise of unwed motherhood - promoted by you leftists - with Diana1180 as the archetypical feminist telling homemakers that they have no value or "useful skills."

Your war on the family rages on, with children the casualties.

lol..this is the first time I have ever been called a Feminist. And you are taking my words out of context. I have never said they have no value. And you tell me what skill they will have to support a family after 20 years of staying home and raising the kids and keeping the house clean.

All I said is that people, men and woman, need a way to support themselves if the need should arise. If my daughter wants to grow up and marry a man and together they decide she should stay home and raise the children, great. But I will also tell her she needs to do something outside of the home that makes her marketable. Such as volunteering. She can volunteer and learn skills that can be developed into a career should the need arise.
 
The failure of the greed obsessed right to pay living wages and benefits has forced mothers to go out to work so your "holier than thou" allegations are nothing but partisan hypocrisy.

And yet, nothing in statistics about "mothers going out to work," only the rise of unwed motherhood - promoted by you leftists - with Diana1180 as the archetypical feminist telling homemakers that they have no value or "useful skills."

Your war on the family rages on, with children the casualties.

There was always unwed mothers, they were just forced to give up their children and sent away.
Three years ago I met my oldest cousin for the first time. No one knew about him. My aunts other children didn't even know about him.

I am sorry we no longer shun unwed mothers. One day maybe you will get over it.
 
There was always unwed mothers,

Right, the frequency hasn't increased at all... GLORIOUS PARTY DICTATES!

they were just forced to give up their children and sent away.

ROFL

Even discounting for the fact that the above was posted by you, that is astoundingly stupid.

Three years ago I met my oldest cousin for the first time. No one knew about him. My aunts other children didn't even know about him.

Well, you know those backwards 1970's - with women sold at auction by evil Republicans..

:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:

I am sorry we no longer shun unwed mothers. One day maybe you will get over it.

Yes, children are so much better off with an unwed mother...

You leftists sure are smart....
 
There was always unwed mothers,

Right, the frequency hasn't increased at all... GLORIOUS PARTY DICTATES!

they were just forced to give up their children and sent away.

ROFL

Even discounting for the fact that the above was posted by you, that is astoundingly stupid.

Three years ago I met my oldest cousin for the first time. No one knew about him. My aunts other children didn't even know about him.

Well, you know those backwards 1970's - with women sold at auction by evil Republicans..

:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:

I am sorry we no longer shun unwed mothers. One day maybe you will get over it.

Yes, children are so much better off with an unwed mother...

You leftists sure are smart....

What do you have against single unwed mothers? You do know they are single because whatever man made them pregnant...also left them, right?
 
The failure of the greed obsessed right to pay living wages and benefits has forced mothers to go out to work so your "holier than thou" allegations are nothing but partisan hypocrisy.

And yet, nothing in statistics about "mothers going out to work," only the rise of unwed motherhood - promoted by you leftists - with Diana1180 as the archetypical feminist telling homemakers that they have no value or "useful skills."

Your war on the family rages on, with children the casualties.

Your failure to recognize your own role in harming society and children is why you are dooming the right to political oblivion. Enjoy your moment in the "sun". It will pass, but not soon enough, and then the adults can put this nation back on track to the future.
 
What do you have against single unwed mothers?

I have the ability to reason. I have the eduction requisite to analyze facts and draw a logical conclusion.

Because of this, I look at the rates of poverty, the dysfunctional social life, and the level of crime associated with the mass numbers of fatherless children and can only conclude that those of you promoting this disastrous situation are driven by malice.

You do know they are single because whatever man made them pregnant...also left them, right?

Is that what it is? Damn, it's 1950, right?

{Teen Mothers

Teen mothers are less likely to complete high school (only one in three receives a high school diploma) and only 1.5% has a college degree by age 30.
Nearly 80% of unmarried teen mothers end up on welfare, a much higher percentage than their older counterparts. Almost 50% of all teen mothers and over 75% of unmarried teen mothers began receiving welfare within five years of the birth of their first child.
While we may imagine that a teen pregnancy is a the result of a one-time mistake, nearly 25% of teen mothers have a second birth before turning twenty.
Teen mothers are less likely to qualify for a high-paying job since only two-thirds of teen moms have a high school diploma.
Teen moms are less likely to attend college.

Children of Teen Mothers

Babies of teen mothers are more likely to be born prematurely and at low birth weight, which raises the probabilities of infant death, blindness, deafness, chronic respiratory problems, mental retardation, mental illness, and cerebral palsy; it also doubles the chance that a child will later be diagnosed as having dyslexia, hyperactivity, or another disability.
These children are also at greater risk of abuse and neglect.
The sons of teen mothers are 13% more likely to end up in prison while teen daughters are 22% more likely to become teen mothers themselves.
If an unmarried teen mother did not end up receiving her high school diploma, there is a 64% chance that the child will grow up in poverty. The child of a married high-school-graduate, however, has only a 7% chance of growing up in poverty.}

Background on Teenage Pregnancy | Do Something

Yeah, what you promote IS evil.
 
15th post
What do you have against single unwed mothers?

I have the ability to reason. I have the eduction requisite to analyze facts and draw a logical conclusion.

Because of this, I look at the rates of poverty, the dysfunctional social life, and the level of crime associated with the mass numbers of fatherless children and can only conclude that those of you promoting this disastrous situation are driven by malice.

You do know they are single because whatever man made them pregnant...also left them, right?

Is that what it is? Damn, it's 1950, right?

{Teen Mothers

Teen mothers are less likely to complete high school (only one in three receives a high school diploma) and only 1.5% has a college degree by age 30.
Nearly 80% of unmarried teen mothers end up on welfare, a much higher percentage than their older counterparts. Almost 50% of all teen mothers and over 75% of unmarried teen mothers began receiving welfare within five years of the birth of their first child.
While we may imagine that a teen pregnancy is a the result of a one-time mistake, nearly 25% of teen mothers have a second birth before turning twenty.
Teen mothers are less likely to qualify for a high-paying job since only two-thirds of teen moms have a high school diploma.
Teen moms are less likely to attend college.

Children of Teen Mothers

Babies of teen mothers are more likely to be born prematurely and at low birth weight, which raises the probabilities of infant death, blindness, deafness, chronic respiratory problems, mental retardation, mental illness, and cerebral palsy; it also doubles the chance that a child will later be diagnosed as having dyslexia, hyperactivity, or another disability.
These children are also at greater risk of abuse and neglect.
The sons of teen mothers are 13% more likely to end up in prison while teen daughters are 22% more likely to become teen mothers themselves.
If an unmarried teen mother did not end up receiving her high school diploma, there is a 64% chance that the child will grow up in poverty. The child of a married high-school-graduate, however, has only a 7% chance of growing up in poverty.}

Background on Teenage Pregnancy | Do Something

Yeah, what you promote IS evil.

Where the hell am I promoting teen pregnancy? I never even brought it up. Teen pregnancy is a completely different issue from what we were discussing.

So this hatred you have for single unwed mothers...you also have for single unwed fathers, right?
 
Last edited:
What do you have against single unwed mothers?

I have the ability to reason. I have the eduction requisite to analyze facts and draw a logical conclusion.

Because of this, I look at the rates of poverty, the dysfunctional social life, and the level of crime associated with the mass numbers of fatherless children and can only conclude that those of you promoting this disastrous situation are driven by malice.

You do know they are single because whatever man made them pregnant...also left them, right?

Is that what it is? Damn, it's 1950, right?

{Teen Mothers

Teen mothers are less likely to complete high school (only one in three receives a high school diploma) and only 1.5% has a college degree by age 30.
Nearly 80% of unmarried teen mothers end up on welfare, a much higher percentage than their older counterparts. Almost 50% of all teen mothers and over 75% of unmarried teen mothers began receiving welfare within five years of the birth of their first child.
While we may imagine that a teen pregnancy is a the result of a one-time mistake, nearly 25% of teen mothers have a second birth before turning twenty.
Teen mothers are less likely to qualify for a high-paying job since only two-thirds of teen moms have a high school diploma.
Teen moms are less likely to attend college.

Children of Teen Mothers

Babies of teen mothers are more likely to be born prematurely and at low birth weight, which raises the probabilities of infant death, blindness, deafness, chronic respiratory problems, mental retardation, mental illness, and cerebral palsy; it also doubles the chance that a child will later be diagnosed as having dyslexia, hyperactivity, or another disability.
These children are also at greater risk of abuse and neglect.
The sons of teen mothers are 13% more likely to end up in prison while teen daughters are 22% more likely to become teen mothers themselves.
If an unmarried teen mother did not end up receiving her high school diploma, there is a 64% chance that the child will grow up in poverty. The child of a married high-school-graduate, however, has only a 7% chance of growing up in poverty.}

Background on Teenage Pregnancy | Do Something

Yeah, what you promote IS evil.

In theory if Uncensored2008 actually had the "ability to reason" and the "eduction [sic] requisite to analyze facts and draw a logical conclusion" he would be 100% in favor of the ACA.

Because the ACA provides contraceptives to women thereby reducing the number of unintended pregnancies, unwed mothers and children living in poverty.

But since he doesn't have any of those skills he is just using those statistics as a blunt weapon to beat up on the left for his own partisan satisfaction to "prove" to himself that he is "right"! And that is who is really "promoting evil" around here.
 
Where the hell am I promoting teen pregnancy? I never even brought it up. Teen pregnancy is a completely different issue from what we were discussing.

So this hatred you have for single unwed mothers...you also have for single unwed fathers, right?

Teen pregnancy is one of the major aspects of the brave new world of fatherless children that you appear to promote.

But rather than the liberating act that you portray, the reality is much darker - particularly for the children involved.
 
In theory if Uncensored2008 actually had the "ability to reason" and the "eduction [sic] requisite to analyze facts and draw a logical conclusion" he would be 100% in favor of the ACA.

Because the ACA provides contraceptives to women thereby reducing the number of unintended pregnancies, unwed mothers and children living in poverty.

Well, all praise our beloved Messiah® - who has again saved us all through his magnificence...

ROFL

You sycophants are a hoot.

So tell me brite boi - when your little tin god put forth fascist care, was this the first that humans ever heard of birth control? Has access to birth control been blocked (by BOOOOOSSSSHHH) all this time, and only your fucktarded little god could bring it to the people?

But since he doesn't have any of those skills he is just using those statistics as a blunt weapon to beat up on the left for his own partisan satisfaction to "prove" to himself that he is "right"! And that is who is really "promoting evil" around here.

Facts on a leftist are like salt on a slug...

As you again prove.
 
Back
Top Bottom