Why Women Need Husbands

[ClosedCaption]

A woman without a man to guide her quickly runs amok.

A woman without direction is a paper boat on a lake of fire

 

[Sarah G]

You guys still trying to convince yourselves that women need you?

 

[Vox]

My view is that we let each person decide what is right for them. And I will defend that view. If you read all that I said you would have seen that I have stated that over and over.

except the person is not an adult popping out from nowhere. and the families, including fathers have an absolute right to encourage their daughters to develop one way or the other.
You, hwever, seem to consider the way of encouraging professional path only to be the valuable approach.
Parents know their kids much better. and if a father or a mother are not especially encouraging for the professional path for their daughter, maybe it is not because thy want her "barefoot and pregnanat", maybe they simly know that she is not very bright and will beneft much more if she is not forced into something she is not suited for?

I have seen too many of those, pushed to pursue "profession" and "studies" where all they really wanted was a husband and kids - and nothing more.

"Oh, Emily? No, she's no that bright. We are hoping some man will come along to marry her so she doesnt have to learn a usefull skill. I mean, she probably couldnt learn it anyway. She will be just fine staying home and taking care of the house and husband"

I have no problem with woman who want to be stay at home moms..and who just wants to be the great mom and wife. Awesome. Good for her. But honestly, I roll my eyes when I hear about a female who doesnt know how to pay bills or balance a budget because the man always did it. God frobid something happens to him. She has no useful skill to now be the provider for the family.

you know we are not all equal in our abilities, right?

and a necessity is a great teacher. even to a dumb one.

balancing the family budget used to be taught in the high school in this country - and that is not a rocket science and can be taught even to somebody not very bright overall.

 

[Vox]

The article is absolutely true but if women want part time jobs and balanced lives, they should not vote dimocrap EVER - because dimocraps are TOXIC for the economy and in the bad economy part-time jobs disappear FIRST.

So all those Ivy League grads and highly educated women should look into their priorities in voting. They have a choice in their priorities to make - what is more important to them - a third-trimester abortion legal and contraceptives paid by taxpayer or be able to find a part-time job easily to balance work and family and to pay for the contraceptives themselves. And never have any need for an abortion.

Did you copy and paste that from some right wing Christian blog?
Why does every issue go back to third trimester abortions for you?

I know you are an idiot and can not understand the written text. Should I make it bold and size 3, so you can read it slowly and aloud to comprehend the written text?

 

[Uncensored2008]

You guys still trying to convince yourselves that women need you?

I need my wife. She needs me.

That's the way it is with healthy people.

You really wouldn't understand.

 

[Vox]

I'm sorry you missed some of my statements. I have simply been adamantly opposed to those who claim a woman's place is in the home. If the woman chooses that, I'm happy for her. But to call them names when they want a career or tell them they are too weak is something I feel justified in challenging.

well, you adamantly decided that a father encouraing his daughter to stay at home and be a wife is soehow damaging to that daughter.

A woman is not born a woman - she is a baby at first, a little girl, a child, a teenager and it takes a long way to grow into a woman.
And the parents know their kids much better, than some "wishing the best" outsiders. You do not know what is the best for a particular child.

Because it is damaging to the daughter. Maybe the daughter wants to be a singer, or a judge, or a corporate CEO. Children aren't ciphers, they have dreams of their own. Just because it's a girl doesn't mean they should be guided out of having those dreams.

no, it is NOT damaging to the daughter. If the daughter has the talents to be a singer or a judge or a corporate CEO her parents are not going to stop her and they are going to be the first ones to encourage her - if she has the abilities.
But if the daughter is not the brightest one and does not have any talents and studying comes with difficulties to her - a loving father and a mother would not push her to obtain an engineering degree or to medical school just to prove the Johnson's their daughter can do it. Or to satisfy their own unfulfilled aspirations.
To much trauma in daughter's life is happening because of that exaggerating push to success by the parents where the daughter herself does not want it.

I have never ever seen in my life any parents STOPPING a talented and smart girl from achieving whatever she wants but I have seen way too much unneeded tears and unhappiness because of the parents pressure to become successful, when all what the girl was wanting herself is to - get married and have a family and live me alone with those stupid studies!!!

 

[Vox]

My view is that we let each person decide what is right for them. And I will defend that view. If you read all that I said you would have seen that I have stated that over and over.

except the person is not an adult popping out from nowhere. and the families, including fathers have an absolute right to encourage their daughters to develop one way or the other.
You, hwever, seem to consider the way of encouraging professional path only to be the valuable approach.
Parents know their kids much better. and if a father or a mother are not especially encouraging for the professional path for their daughter, maybe it is not because thy want her "barefoot and pregnanat", maybe they simly know that she is not very bright and will beneft much more if she is not forced into something she is not suited for?

I have seen too many of those, pushed to pursue "profession" and "studies" where all they really wanted was a husband and kids - and nothing more.

If you had read the comparison I made to clarify, I talked about the difference between what some tell their sons as opposed to what they tell their daughters.

And it is funny that you defend everyone's right to their own opinion, except for when I express mine.

My posts have been about each person being able to choose what is best for them. I don't see you berating the man who said women need a husband because they are weak.

But that is simply a LIE. Parents tell their daughters the same as they tell their sons - if they are reasonable loving parents, they know how to differentiate between a smart kid and a not that smart one and guide them in their life choices independently of the gender.

If they view their kids as some kind of self ego fulfillment - they will push ant torture their kids with their OWN, parental, aspirations instead of letting the child be happy at the level they are born with to achieve that.
Boys can be traumatized by unnecessary high goals the same way as girls are.

 

[Vox]

Can be and want to be are two different things.

Just FYI whenever I say something I'm not talking about 100% of the people 100% of the time but women don't want to handle shit at the most they want to be co-captain. If they have to be captain they're looking around to see if there is a ship they can board.

This pretend world we created where we have to lie and say men and women are the same is the reason we are where we are today. Women thinking they can do it on their own...THEY CAN but they are lying to themselves to say they prefer it that way. But since they have to have this "I'm strong and independent" façade going on it turned away from just being strong and able to do it on their own to "I DONT NEED A MAN!!" bullshit out of pride

WOW, I am amazed, to say the least

expound

well, you are a leftist. But your views on the family and gender roles are NORMAL ones, not a skewed idiotic feminist ( American style) agenda the standard American leftists profess all the time

 

[Vox]

The article is absolutely true but if women want part time jobs and balanced lives, they should not vote dimocrap EVER - because dimocraps are TOXIC for the economy and in the bad economy part-time jobs disappear FIRST.

So all those Ivy League grads and highly educated women should look into their priorities in voting. They have a choice in their priorities to make - what is more important to them - a third-trimester abortion legal and contraceptives paid by taxpayer or be able to find a part-time job easily to balance work and family and to pay for the contraceptives themselves. And never have any need for an abortion.

Wait, it must be the liberul's fault.

LOL

no, it is a leftard's fault

 

[ClosedCaption]

You guys still trying to convince yourselves that women need you?

No its women who need constant convincing they don't need a man. That's why you never hear a song from a guy saying he don't need women but you always hear a chick trying to convince themselves they can go it alone.

They can...they just don't want to.

 

[Vox]

There was always unwed mothers,

Right, the frequency hasn't increased at all... GLORIOUS PARTY DICTATES!



ROFL

Even discounting for the fact that the above was posted by you, that is astoundingly stupid.



Well, you know those backwards 1970's - with women sold at auction by evil Republicans..

I am sorry we no longer shun unwed mothers. One day maybe you will get over it.

Yes, children are so much better off with an unwed mother...

You leftists sure are smart....

What do you have against single unwed mothers? You do know they are single because whatever man made them pregnant...also left them, right?

that's a lie. or are you projecting your victimhood on everybody?

there are single mothers in this society in such extremely high numbers because it is a way to receive a government paycheck AND DO NOTHING - if you are a single mother.
cut that paycheck to 3-5 years only - and the problem will almost cease to exist.
Together with poverty.

 

[Vox]

You guys still trying to convince yourselves that women need you?

No its women who need constant convincing they don't need a man. That's why you never hear a song from a guy saying he don't need women but you always hear a chick trying to convince themselves they can go it alone.

They can...they just don't want to.

or if they do they might find out eventually they don't like it

 

[ClosedCaption]

You guys still trying to convince yourselves that women need you?

No its women who need constant convincing they don't need a man. That's why you never hear a song from a guy saying he don't need women but you always hear a chick trying to convince themselves they can go it alone.

They can...they just don't want to.

or if they do they might find out eventually they don't like it

Exactly right!

 

[Unkotare]

The failure of the greed obsessed right to pay living wages and benefits has forced mothers to go out to work so your "holier than thou" allegations are nothing but partisan hypocrisy.

And yet, nothing in statistics about "mothers going out to work," only the rise of unwed motherhood - promoted by you leftists - with Diana1180 as the archetypical feminist telling homemakers that they have no value or "useful skills."

Your war on the family rages on, with children the casualties.

Your failure to recognize your own role in harming society and children is why you are dooming the right to political oblivion. Enjoy your moment in the "sun". It will pass, but not soon enough, and then the adults can put this nation back on track to the future.

"Moment in the sun"? The left controls the Senate and the White House right now. Before 2010 you had the House as well. Why haven't your 'adults' put the nation "back on track to the future" by now?

 

[Derideo_Te]

In theory if Uncensored2008 actually had the "ability to reason" and the "eduction [sic] requisite to analyze facts and draw a logical conclusion" he would be 100% in favor of the ACA.

Because the ACA provides contraceptives to women thereby reducing the number of unintended pregnancies, unwed mothers and children living in poverty.

Well, all praise our beloved Messiah® - who has again saved us all through his magnificence...

ROFL

You sycophants are a hoot.

So tell me brite boi - when your little tin god put forth fascist care, was this the first that humans ever heard of birth control? Has access to birth control been blocked (by BOOOOOSSSSHHH) all this time, and only your fucktarded little god could bring it to the people?

But since he doesn't have any of those skills he is just using those statistics as a blunt weapon to beat up on the left for his own partisan satisfaction to "prove" to himself that he is "right"! And that is who is really "promoting evil" around here.

Facts on a leftist are like salt on a slug...

As you again prove.

Thank you for tacitly admitting to being both a hypocrite and lying about yourself.

 

[Derideo_Te]

You guys still trying to convince yourselves that women need you?

I need my wife. She needs me.

That's the way it is with healthy people.

You really wouldn't understand.

Fascinating that earlier you claimed to be raising 3 daughters as a single father and yet now you are admitting to being married? That flushing sound you hear is your credibility.

 

[Sarah G]

The article is absolutely true but if women want part time jobs and balanced lives, they should not vote dimocrap EVER - because dimocraps are TOXIC for the economy and in the bad economy part-time jobs disappear FIRST.

So all those Ivy League grads and highly educated women should look into their priorities in voting. They have a choice in their priorities to make - what is more important to them - a third-trimester abortion legal and contraceptives paid by taxpayer or be able to find a part-time job easily to balance work and family and to pay for the contraceptives themselves. And never have any need for an abortion.

Did you copy and paste that from some right wing Christian blog?
Why does every issue go back to third trimester abortions for you?

I know you are an idiot and can not understand the written text. Should I make it bold and size 3, so you can read it slowly and aloud to comprehend the written text?

This is why nobody needs you. You're a nasty wanker.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Fascinating that earlier you claimed to be raising 3 daughters as a single father and yet now you are admitting to being married? That flushing sound you hear is your credibility.

You're not terribly bright - you know that?

My youngest daughter is 30.

 

[Luissa]

The article is absolutely true but if women want part time jobs and balanced lives, they should not vote dimocrap EVER - because dimocraps are TOXIC for the economy and in the bad economy part-time jobs disappear FIRST.

So all those Ivy League grads and highly educated women should look into their priorities in voting. They have a choice in their priorities to make - what is more important to them - a third-trimester abortion legal and contraceptives paid by taxpayer or be able to find a part-time job easily to balance work and family and to pay for the contraceptives themselves. And never have any need for an abortion.

Did you copy and paste that from some right wing Christian blog?
Why does every issue go back to third trimester abortions for you?

I know you are an idiot and can not understand the written text. Should I make it bold and size 3, so you can read it slowly and aloud to comprehend the written text?

I understood the lunatic crap you wrote. I was just wondering if you copy and paste some of the crap you spew from right wing blogs.
I guess you are too stupid to get my point.

And why does every thing go back to abortions for you?

 

[Derideo_Te]

Did you copy and paste that from some right wing Christian blog?
Why does every issue go back to third trimester abortions for you?

I know you are an idiot and can not understand the written text. Should I make it bold and size 3, so you can read it slowly and aloud to comprehend the written text?

I understood the lunatic crap you wrote. I was just wondering if you copy and paste some of the crap you spew from right wing blogs.
I guess you are too stupid to get my point.

And why does every thing go back to abortions for you?

The term "stuck on stupid" seems to be running rampant throughout the responses on the right.