Why Women Need Husbands

[Vox]

Did you copy and paste that from some right wing Christian blog?
Why does every issue go back to third trimester abortions for you?

I know you are an idiot and can not understand the written text. Should I make it bold and size 3, so you can read it slowly and aloud to comprehend the written text?

I understood the lunatic crap you wrote. I was just wondering if you copy and paste some of the crap you spew from right wing blogs.
I guess you are too stupid to get my point.

And why does every thing go back to abortions for you?

you don't understand the basic words and I am already used to it.
now get to the text and try to comprehend it.
or is abortion and sex and contraception all you can think of? poor unsatisfied vagina with vocal cords

 

[Vox]

The term "stuck on stupid" seems to be running rampant throughout the responses on the right.

Ironic post is ironic.....


Luissa and Derideo, betwixt the two have an IQ pool nearing double digits....

who think women interests, needs and rights are fixed on contraception, sex and abortions only.

but that is the way the left programs those idiots.
it is not women's rights - it is "reproductive rights" only, so, God forbid , some of the women will get off the brainwashing program and think for themselves and decide that "reproductive rights" is the least of their real concern but a perfect distraction for the idiots like Luissa or Noomi, or Derideo

 

[Vox]

What do you have against single unwed mothers? You do know they are single because whatever man made them pregnant...also left them, right?

that's a lie. or are you projecting your victimhood on everybody?

there are single mothers in this society in such extremely high numbers because it is a way to receive a government paycheck AND DO NOTHING - if you are a single mother.
cut that paycheck to 3-5 years only - and the problem will almost cease to exist.
Together with poverty.

Now this is just sheer stupidity.

Vox you believe that women need husbands because they dont want to be running the show. They WANT a husband that will do it and take those burdens off of her.

But here you are claiming that women are doing exactly what they DONT want to do for the CHANCE to get govt Benefits? They push away the very thing you say they want and need for something they MIGHT get.

This is stupid. You reduce the number of years and suddenly what? Guys come back into the womans lives and everything is great? Men will suddenly tie the knot because no more govt to interfere?

What planet are you on and how strong is the stuff you're smoking?

gosh you are stupid. All leftards are but you have produced some flashes of possible brain activity earlier, so there was a chance of possible coherence. not anymore - the same idiocy as all those sarahs, luissas and other derideos - which all can think about their unsatisfactory area of life only

if there is no guarantee of the constant paycheck from the government for the uterine work of producing children out of the wedlock, the activity stops and the vicious circle of poverty as well.
As it was before this idiocy of rewarding the irresponsibility was started.

 

[ClosedCaption]

that's a lie. or are you projecting your victimhood on everybody?

there are single mothers in this society in such extremely high numbers because it is a way to receive a government paycheck AND DO NOTHING - if you are a single mother.
cut that paycheck to 3-5 years only - and the problem will almost cease to exist.
Together with poverty.

Now this is just sheer stupidity.

Vox you believe that women need husbands because they dont want to be running the show. They WANT a husband that will do it and take those burdens off of her.

But here you are claiming that women are doing exactly what they DONT want to do for the CHANCE to get govt Benefits? They push away the very thing you say they want and need for something they MIGHT get.

This is stupid. You reduce the number of years and suddenly what? Guys come back into the womans lives and everything is great? Men will suddenly tie the knot because no more govt to interfere?

What planet are you on and how strong is the stuff you're smoking?

gosh you are stupid. All leftards are but you have produced some flashes of possible brain activity earlier, so there was a chance of possible coherence. not anymore - the same idiocy as all those sarahs, luissas and other derideos - which all can think about their unsatisfactory area of life only

if there is no guarantee of the constant paycheck from the government for the uterine work of producing children out of the wedlock, the activity stops and the vicious circle of poverty as well.
As it was before this idiocy of rewarding the irresponsibility was started.

How? Besides the fact that there is no "guarantee" and not such thing as a "constant paycheck". You neglicted to say why women would reverse everything they want and desire for the possibility of a check

For example I say "Get rid of x and y happens"

You forgot to say how. Now show how wrong I am instead of just repeating wrong wrong wrong...prove it.

How?

 

[Luissa]

I know you are an idiot and can not understand the written text. Should I make it bold and size 3, so you can read it slowly and aloud to comprehend the written text?

I understood the lunatic crap you wrote. I was just wondering if you copy and paste some of the crap you spew from right wing blogs.
I guess you are too stupid to get my point.

And why does every thing go back to abortions for you?

you don't understand the basic words and I am already used to it.
now get to the text and try to comprehend it.
or is abortion and sex and contraception all you can think of? poor unsatisfied vagina with vocal cords

Okay, so you are just parrot. Got it.

Is that another $1 you heard?

 

[Vox]

Now this is just sheer stupidity.

Vox you believe that women need husbands because they dont want to be running the show. They WANT a husband that will do it and take those burdens off of her.

But here you are claiming that women are doing exactly what they DONT want to do for the CHANCE to get govt Benefits? They push away the very thing you say they want and need for something they MIGHT get.

This is stupid. You reduce the number of years and suddenly what? Guys come back into the womans lives and everything is great? Men will suddenly tie the knot because no more govt to interfere?

What planet are you on and how strong is the stuff you're smoking?

gosh you are stupid. All leftards are but you have produced some flashes of possible brain activity earlier, so there was a chance of possible coherence. not anymore - the same idiocy as all those sarahs, luissas and other derideos - which all can think about their unsatisfactory area of life only

if there is no guarantee of the constant paycheck from the government for the uterine work of producing children out of the wedlock, the activity stops and the vicious circle of poverty as well.
As it was before this idiocy of rewarding the irresponsibility was started.

How? Besides the fact that there is no "guarantee" and not such thing as a "constant paycheck". You neglicted to say why women would reverse everything they want and desire for the possibility of a check

For example I say "Get rid of x and y happens"

You forgot to say how. Now show how wrong I am instead of just repeating wrong wrong wrong...prove it.

How?

how what?
if there is no financial reward for having a child out of the wedlock - there won't be any drive to make a living in this way.
There is a guarantee right now - until the child is 18 there are numerous handouts.
They should be limited to the time until the child goes to school - and then cut off. The mother can work, can finish school while receiving help and if she knows that the help is going to be only temporary - she might either use one of the contraception methods available and not have children before being married or get herself organized and get some education and a job to have a living after the "free stuff" is cut off.

it will address the issue of the constant vicious circle of poverty in the lower economic segment of the society.
For the higher segment it is not so pertinent - women in the higher segment usually do not have children before marriage as they know that it is a recipe for poverty and misery ahead.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

that's a lie. or are you projecting your victimhood on everybody?

there are single mothers in this society in such extremely high numbers because it is a way to receive a government paycheck AND DO NOTHING - if you are a single mother.
cut that paycheck to 3-5 years only - and the problem will almost cease to exist.
Together with poverty.

Now this is just sheer stupidity.

Vox you believe that women need husbands because they dont want to be running the show. They WANT a husband that will do it and take those burdens off of her.

But here you are claiming that women are doing exactly what they DONT want to do for the CHANCE to get govt Benefits? They push away the very thing you say they want and need for something they MIGHT get.

This is stupid. You reduce the number of years and suddenly what? Guys come back into the womans lives and everything is great? Men will suddenly tie the knot because no more govt to interfere?

What planet are you on and how strong is the stuff you're smoking?

gosh you are stupid. All leftards are but you have produced some flashes of possible brain activity earlier, so there was a chance of possible coherence. not anymore - the same idiocy as all those sarahs, luissas and other derideos - which all can think about their unsatisfactory area of life only

if there is no guarantee of the constant paycheck from the government for the uterine work of producing children out of the wedlock, the activity stops and the vicious circle of poverty as well.
As it was before this idiocy of rewarding the irresponsibility was started.

Wrong again, as usual.

Welfare Reform policy places a ‘family cap’ on TANF benefits when children are born to a Cash recipient, reducing or eliminating the benefit for those additional children.

This has also been in place since 1996.

Consequently ‘the vicious circle of poverty’ is a rightist contrivance and myth, as is the moronic notion that receipt of public assistance constitutes ‘rewarding irresponsibility.’

The fact is the majority of those who receive public assistance do so for only a short period of time, never to return; and those who do receive assistance for longer periods of time represent a minuscule percentage of the population. Moreover, longer-term recipients often suffer significant barriers to work or education opportunities, such as learning disabilities, physical incapacitates, or being located in a rural venue absent access to transportation.

Issues of poverty, public assistance, deprivation, and single parenthood are complex and not subject to naïve, simplistic ‘solutions’ commonly advocated by ignorant conservatives.

But conservatives aren’t interested in finding solutions, they’re content to keep their contrivances and lies concerning public assistance and ‘welfare queens’ alive and well, perceived to be some useful political weapon, the proof of this can be found on this forum, and in this very thread.

 

[Vox]

Now this is just sheer stupidity.

Vox you believe that women need husbands because they dont want to be running the show. They WANT a husband that will do it and take those burdens off of her.

But here you are claiming that women are doing exactly what they DONT want to do for the CHANCE to get govt Benefits? They push away the very thing you say they want and need for something they MIGHT get.

This is stupid. You reduce the number of years and suddenly what? Guys come back into the womans lives and everything is great? Men will suddenly tie the knot because no more govt to interfere?

What planet are you on and how strong is the stuff you're smoking?

gosh you are stupid. All leftards are but you have produced some flashes of possible brain activity earlier, so there was a chance of possible coherence. not anymore - the same idiocy as all those sarahs, luissas and other derideos - which all can think about their unsatisfactory area of life only

if there is no guarantee of the constant paycheck from the government for the uterine work of producing children out of the wedlock, the activity stops and the vicious circle of poverty as well.
As it was before this idiocy of rewarding the irresponsibility was started.

Wrong again, as usual.

Welfare Reform policy places a ‘family cap’ on TANF benefits when children are born to a Cash recipient, reducing or eliminating the benefit for those additional children.

This has also been in place since 1996.

Consequently ‘the vicious circle of poverty’ is a rightist contrivance and myth, as is the moronic notion that receipt of public assistance constitutes ‘rewarding irresponsibility.’

The fact is the majority of those who receive public assistance do so for only a short period of time, never to return; and those who do receive assistance for longer periods of time represent a minuscule percentage of the population. Moreover, longer-term recipients often suffer significant barriers to work or education opportunities, such as learning disabilities, physical incapacitates, or being located in a rural venue absent access to transportation.

Issues of poverty, public assistance, deprivation, and single parenthood are complex and not subject to naïve, simplistic ‘solutions’ commonly advocated by ignorant conservatives.

But conservatives aren’t interested in finding solutions, they’re content to keep their contrivances and lies concerning public assistance and ‘welfare queens’ alive and well, perceived to be some useful political weapon, the proof of this can be found on this forum, and in this very thread.

TANF is not the only handout given'' and it is not the only one given to the single mothers - there numerous , housing including.so wrong again on your part.

as usual.

 

[Indofred]

Marriage is needed so the woman can be assured of care and comfort as she needs it; especially when pregnant or looking after small children.
I see it as my duty to do the best I can for my wife and child.
In return; she looks after me; cooking when I get home from work and making sure the servants keep the place clean and do the ironing so I have a fresh shirt every day.

I believe marriage is the only way to go when it comes to a serious relationship and marriage should not be watered down in any way with all this PC crap we see.

It's there to provide a secure environment for all concerned.

Of course, there are problems with some partners in marriage, abusive husbands or really crap wives, nothing is perfect but marriage does a lot to keep things in order.

 

[BDBoop]

You guys still trying to convince yourselves that women need you?

OMG. Tell me about it. And there's one person I just stopped respecting this very moment, because I had NO IDEA he was such an ass.

Live and learn.

 

[Vox]

What do you have against single unwed mothers? You do know they are single because whatever man made them pregnant...also left them, right?

that's a lie. or are you projecting your victimhood on everybody?

there are single mothers in this society in such extremely high numbers because it is a way to receive a government paycheck AND DO NOTHING - if you are a single mother.
cut that paycheck to 3-5 years only - and the problem will almost cease to exist.
Together with poverty.

Wow! You really hate single mothers.

Who supported you during your three years off?

My husband .

and the maternity leave is paid. By my taxes.

 

[ClosedCaption]

gosh you are stupid. All leftards are but you have produced some flashes of possible brain activity earlier, so there was a chance of possible coherence. not anymore - the same idiocy as all those sarahs, luissas and other derideos - which all can think about their unsatisfactory area of life only

if there is no guarantee of the constant paycheck from the government for the uterine work of producing children out of the wedlock, the activity stops and the vicious circle of poverty as well.
As it was before this idiocy of rewarding the irresponsibility was started.

How? Besides the fact that there is no "guarantee" and not such thing as a "constant paycheck". You neglicted to say why women would reverse everything they want and desire for the possibility of a check

For example I say "Get rid of x and y happens"

You forgot to say how. Now show how wrong I am instead of just repeating wrong wrong wrong...prove it.

How?

how what?
if there is no financial reward for having a child out of the wedlock - there won't be any drive to make a living in this way.

There isn't...that thing you are calling a "reward" would be given up in a heartbeat for the "reward" of having a husband and father in the house

There is a guarantee right now - until the child is 18 there are numerous handouts.

Again, just because you say guarantee a bunch doesn't mean one exists. If it was guaranteed you wouldn't need to qualify for it.

They should be limited to the time until the child goes to school - and then cut off. The mother can work, can finish school while receiving help and if she knows that the help is going to be only temporary - she might either use one of the contraception methods available and not have children before being married or get herself organized and get some education and a job to have a living after the "free stuff" is cut off.

It is temporary so....

it will address the issue of the constant vicious circle of poverty in the lower economic segment of the society.

No it wouldn't. Pulling up the ladder doesn't address the issue of survivors at the bottom of the pit and ending assistance wont magically make single mothers disappear. This is why you are having such a hard time explaining how because it doesn't make sense unless you want to try it again

For the higher segment it is not so pertinent - women in the higher segment usually do not have children before marriage as they know that it is a recipe for poverty and misery ahead.

And don't forget being from that higher segment means they are better people...just kidding...it means they have higher segments of family to assist too. You just believe they have children out of wedlock and don't need assistance because they are better humans

 

[Vox]

How? Besides the fact that there is no "guarantee" and not such thing as a "constant paycheck". You neglicted to say why women would reverse everything they want and desire for the possibility of a check

For example I say "Get rid of x and y happens"

You forgot to say how. Now show how wrong I am instead of just repeating wrong wrong wrong...prove it.

How?

how what?
if there is no financial reward for having a child out of the wedlock - there won't be any drive to make a living in this way.

There isn't...that thing you are calling a "reward" would be given up in a heartbeat for the "reward" of having a husband and father in the house

it depends on what people consider a reward. I mindless teenager is not concerned about the future of her child, she just wants to prove she can also have a child ( it is a status issue for some), get the government paycheck and drop out of school to do nothing

Again, just because you say guarantee a bunch doesn't mean one exists. If it was guaranteed you wouldn't need to qualify for it.

they do qualify for it - by doing nothing, just having a kid. That is the point.

It is temporary so....

it is not. it is until the kid is 18. and the amount of kids is not limited. and it should.

it will address the issue of the constant vicious circle of poverty in the lower economic segment of the society.

No it wouldn't. Pulling up the ladder doesn't address the issue of survivors at the bottom of the pit and ending assistance wont magically make single mothers disappear. This is why you are having such a hard time explaining how because it doesn't make sense unless you want to try it again

yes, it would. they would not disappear, but there won't be an epidemic of them - if the figures return to the early 70s - that already will mena the healthier society. And wealthier as well.

For the higher segment it is not so pertinent - women in the higher segment usually do not have children before marriage as they know that it is a recipe for poverty and misery ahead.

And don't forget being from that higher segment means they are better people...just kidding...it means they have higher segments of family to assist too. You just believe they have children out of wedlock and don't need assistance because they are better humans

No, being from the higher segment means you are able to provide for yourself and you are not aiming as low as it can be - and having children just to guarantee the government handout is the lowest one can possibly get.
It is not the amount of money one has. It is the mindset.
the immigrants coming to this country have much less than those living in the poverty for generations.
Yet they climb the ladder quite fast - because their mindset is different and if they do not aim at the paycheck to be given - they have to employ their skills and they prosper.
It is not a racial or ethnic issue, BTW - it purely economic issue.
If there won't be welfare and handouts started in the 60s - by now there won't be racism and overwhelmingly black poverty in the inner cities remaining.
Africans from Africa and Carribean African descendants prosper the same way any other immigrants do.

 

[Luissa]

that's a lie. or are you projecting your victimhood on everybody?

there are single mothers in this society in such extremely high numbers because it is a way to receive a government paycheck AND DO NOTHING - if you are a single mother.
cut that paycheck to 3-5 years only - and the problem will almost cease to exist.
Together with poverty.

Wow! You really hate single mothers.

Who supported you during your three years off?

My husband .

and the maternity leave is paid. By my taxes.

And if a women works for a certain amount a time and then goes on TANF, it isn't her tax dollars?
I always love people who think it is justified when they receive help or use a program paid for by the "their" tax dollars, but judge others who do the same.

 

[Vox]

Wow! You really hate single mothers.

Who supported you during your three years off?

My husband .

and the maternity leave is paid. By my taxes.

And if a women works for a certain amount a time and then goes on TANF, it isn't her tax dollars?
I always love people who think it is justified when they receive help or use a program paid for by the "their" tax dollars, but judge others who do the same.

you know perfectly well which segment I am referring to and they did not work first and then went on TANF.
stop taking everything so personally
the virus is spreading - there are generations now which have never worked a day but receiving the handouts.

plus there are no universal maternity leaves in this country - your stupid feminists did not bother to fight for that.
But there are legal third trimester abortions instead - enjoy, it must be extremely helpful for you

 

[Luissa]

My husband .

and the maternity leave is paid. By my taxes.

And if a women works for a certain amount a time and then goes on TANF, it isn't her tax dollars?
I always love people who think it is justified when they receive help or use a program paid for by the "their" tax dollars, but judge others who do the same.

you know perfectly well which segment I am referring to and they did not work first and then went on TANF.
stop taking everything so personally
the virus is spreading - there are generations now which have never worked a day but receiving the handouts.

plus there are no universal maternity leaves in this country - your stupid feminists did not bother to fight for that.
But there are legal third trimester abortions instead - enjoy, it must be extremely helpful for you

How do you know if they worked or not?
And we aren't talking about abortion.

 

[BDBoop]

How? Besides the fact that there is no "guarantee" and not such thing as a "constant paycheck". You neglicted to say why women would reverse everything they want and desire for the possibility of a check

For example I say "Get rid of x and y happens"

You forgot to say how. Now show how wrong I am instead of just repeating wrong wrong wrong...prove it.

How?

how what?
if there is no financial reward for having a child out of the wedlock - there won't be any drive to make a living in this way.

There isn't...that thing you are calling a "reward" would be given up in a heartbeat for the "reward" of having a husband and father in the house




Again, just because you say guarantee a bunch doesn't mean one exists. If it was guaranteed you wouldn't need to qualify for it.




It is temporary so....

it will address the issue of the constant vicious circle of poverty in the lower economic segment of the society.

No it wouldn't. Pulling up the ladder doesn't address the issue of survivors at the bottom of the pit and ending assistance wont magically make single mothers disappear. This is why you are having such a hard time explaining how because it doesn't make sense unless you want to try it again

For the higher segment it is not so pertinent - women in the higher segment usually do not have children before marriage as they know that it is a recipe for poverty and misery ahead.

And don't forget being from that higher segment means they are better people...just kidding...it means they have higher segments of family to assist too. You just believe they have children out of wedlock and don't need assistance because they are better humans

I would address your posts point-by-point, but my brain won't stop swearing in tongues. The only identifiable phrase I can pick out is "Know how I know you're a dick?"

When my daughter was young, she wanted a dad. I explained life a bit, and concluded by informing her that me getting married wouldn't guarantee her a good dad any more than it would guarantee me a good husband.

Staying single is what some of us did on the best interest of our child. My stepfather adopted me in fifth grade and adopted me in sixth. They married when I was four, had been together since I was three so yes: I believed him when he explained that this is how young women learned about sex.

Now, I may not represent the norm. But it is my truth. And I did go on to marry a dear friend that I was co-workers with for the better part of a decade. Not for economic reasons, because I knew how to live within my means. No, I married for love.

This thread - it is just crazy to me. Women are supposed to need a man in their life? And then what. Go mildly depressed until she finds her "other half?"

What a load of tosh.

 

[Vox]

And if a women works for a certain amount a time and then goes on TANF, it isn't her tax dollars?
I always love people who think it is justified when they receive help or use a program paid for by the "their" tax dollars, but judge others who do the same.

you know perfectly well which segment I am referring to and they did not work first and then went on TANF.
stop taking everything so personally
the virus is spreading - there are generations now which have never worked a day but receiving the handouts.

plus there are no universal maternity leaves in this country - your stupid feminists did not bother to fight for that.
But there are legal third trimester abortions instead - enjoy, it must be extremely helpful for you

How do you know if they worked or not?
And we aren't talking about abortion.

I know. there is such thing called statistics.

yes, we are talking about abortion - any time the question of non-existing universal maternity leave in this country arises I will remind you about the great advantage you have instead of it - the advantage not existing in any country where women have maternity leaves, daycare and pregnancy protection at work - but they lack the biggest achievement the American women have - the possibility of the third trimester abortion
Be proud of what you have and what feminists have achieved for you

 

[Luissa]

you know perfectly well which segment I am referring to and they did not work first and then went on TANF.
stop taking everything so personally
the virus is spreading - there are generations now which have never worked a day but receiving the handouts.

plus there are no universal maternity leaves in this country - your stupid feminists did not bother to fight for that.
But there are legal third trimester abortions instead - enjoy, it must be extremely helpful for you

How do you know if they worked or not?
And we aren't talking about abortion.

I know. there is such thing called statistics.

yes, we are talking about abortion - any time the question of non-existing universal maternity leave in this country arises I will remind you about the great advantage you have instead of it - the advantage not existing in any country where women have maternity leaves, daycare and pregnancy protection at work - but they lack the biggest achievement the American women have - the possibility of the third trimester abortion
Be proud of what you have and what feminists have achieved for you

Care to show me those statistics?

Do you even know my opinion on third trimester abortions?
I am guessing no. You are just a troll, who spews right wing propaganda any chance you get.

 

[Vox]

How do you know if they worked or not?
And we aren't talking about abortion.

I know. there is such thing called statistics.

yes, we are talking about abortion - any time the question of non-existing universal maternity leave in this country arises I will remind you about the great advantage you have instead of it - the advantage not existing in any country where women have maternity leaves, daycare and pregnancy protection at work - but they lack the biggest achievement the American women have - the possibility of the third trimester abortion
Be proud of what you have and what feminists have achieved for you

Care to show me those statistics?

Do you even know my opinion on third trimester abortions?
I am guessing no. You are just a troll, who spews right wing propaganda any chance you get.

cdc.gov and bureau of labor statistics - for the starters

get your ass up and work yourself, your laziness.

your opinion on the third trimester abortion is irrelevant.
as are you for the masters whose song in choir you are singing.

Instead of enjoying a paid maternity leave