- Banned
- #21
George Kirby according to Nanzi Poolousy.George Floyd? Who's he?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
George Kirby according to Nanzi Poolousy.George Floyd? Who's he?
Agreed but to do to them what you say is stupid to do is to be the same hypocrite.Need to get out of revenge shit. There is zero valid reason to take it down.
I think MLK is one of the greatest Americans in our history. My point with this thread is to highlight the utter hypocrisy of the BLM movement and the American Left. MLK would be called an Uncle Tom today. He would either be mocked or completely ignored by the Left and the media. I think he would be shocked by how far we have fallen.
George Kirby according to Nanzi Poolousy.George Floyd? Who's he?
Need to get out of revenge shit. There is zero valid reason to take it down.
I think MLK is one of the greatest Americans in our history. My point with this thread is to highlight the utter hypocrisy of the BLM movement and the American Left. MLK would be called an Uncle Tom today. He would either be mocked or completely ignored by the Left and the media. I think he would be shocked by how far we have fallen.
Well, feel free to try.I have been listening and following closely to the "protesters" who are tearing down monuments of immoral people across the Country.
Washington and Jefferson... Slave holders. They have to come down. Teddy Roosevelt.... a white guy who fought in the Spanish American War. Clearly anti-Latino. Gotta come down. U.S. Grant.... I'm not sure, but he's a white guy. The statute has to come down.
And that brings us to MLK. He was a man of God who happened to be a serially adulterous. I mean Mike slept with a lot of women....and I mean a lot of women, but unfortunately only one of them was his wife.
So by the logic of the "protesters" doesn't MLK's monument have to come down? He was clearly immoral. He violated his vows as a Man of God.
What do you think?
dumb idea
Why? The founders were men. They were flawed. MLK was a man. He was flawed. The founders made morally questionable decisions regarding slavery. MLK violated one of the most sacred commandments of his faith over and over again.
Shouldn't we cancel MLK? He advocated non-violence. Isn't that wrong when people are burning down buildings and toppling monuments? MLK advocated whites and blacks living in harmony. That clearly won't fly when we now will have separate but equal national anthems based on skin color.
Nope. MLK must go.
And that brings us to MLK. He was a man of God who happened to be a serially adulterous. I mean Mike slept with a lot of women....and I mean a lot of women, but unfortunately only one of them was his wife.
So by the logic of the "protesters" doesn't MLK's monument have to come down? He was clearly immoral. He violated his vows as a Man of God.
What do you think?
Well, feel free to try.I have been listening and following closely to the "protesters" who are tearing down monuments of immoral people across the Country.
Washington and Jefferson... Slave holders. They have to come down. Teddy Roosevelt.... a white guy who fought in the Spanish American War. Clearly anti-Latino. Gotta come down. U.S. Grant.... I'm not sure, but he's a white guy. The statute has to come down.
And that brings us to MLK. He was a man of God who happened to be a serially adulterous. I mean Mike slept with a lot of women....and I mean a lot of women, but unfortunately only one of them was his wife.
So by the logic of the "protesters" doesn't MLK's monument have to come down? He was clearly immoral. He violated his vows as a Man of God.
What do you think?
dumb idea
Why? The founders were men. They were flawed. MLK was a man. He was flawed. The founders made morally questionable decisions regarding slavery. MLK violated one of the most sacred commandments of his faith over and over again.
Shouldn't we cancel MLK? He advocated non-violence. Isn't that wrong when people are burning down buildings and toppling monuments? MLK advocated whites and blacks living in harmony. That clearly won't fly when we now will have separate but equal national anthems based on skin color.
Nope. MLK must go.
And that brings us to MLK. He was a man of God who happened to be a serially adulterous. I mean Mike slept with a lot of women....and I mean a lot of women, but unfortunately only one of them was his wife.
And so what? Every last one of them was a consenting adult.
So by the logic of the "protesters" doesn't MLK's monument have to come down? He was clearly immoral. He violated his vows as a Man of God.
What do you think?
I think you need to stop competing for "idiot of the year".
The people whose statues are being torn down now did a lot more than just step out on their wives. Their actions led to the suffering of thousands or even millions of people.
Well, feel free to try.I have been listening and following closely to the "protesters" who are tearing down monuments of immoral people across the Country.
Washington and Jefferson... Slave holders. They have to come down. Teddy Roosevelt.... a white guy who fought in the Spanish American War. Clearly anti-Latino. Gotta come down. U.S. Grant.... I'm not sure, but he's a white guy. The statute has to come down.
And that brings us to MLK. He was a man of God who happened to be a serially adulterous. I mean Mike slept with a lot of women....and I mean a lot of women, but unfortunately only one of them was his wife.
So by the logic of the "protesters" doesn't MLK's monument have to come down? He was clearly immoral. He violated his vows as a Man of God.
What do you think?
dumb idea
Why? The founders were men. They were flawed. MLK was a man. He was flawed. The founders made morally questionable decisions regarding slavery. MLK violated one of the most sacred commandments of his faith over and over again.
Shouldn't we cancel MLK? He advocated non-violence. Isn't that wrong when people are burning down buildings and toppling monuments? MLK advocated whites and blacks living in harmony. That clearly won't fly when we now will have separate but equal national anthems based on skin color.
Nope. MLK must go.
Do you like the idea of separate but equal National Anthems? One for Blacks and one for Whites? I mean, it isn't water fountains or bathrooms, right?
Not your call to make. You bitch about division then force your views on others.And that brings us to MLK. He was a man of God who happened to be a serially adulterous. I mean Mike slept with a lot of women....and I mean a lot of women, but unfortunately only one of them was his wife.
And so what? Every last one of them was a consenting adult.
So by the logic of the "protesters" doesn't MLK's monument have to come down? He was clearly immoral. He violated his vows as a Man of God.
What do you think?
I think you need to stop competing for "idiot of the year".
The people whose statues are being torn down now did a lot more than just step out on their wives. Their actions led to the suffering of thousands or even millions of people.
Today MLK would be called an Uncle Tom by white liberals. Just a fact.We need another MLK badly IMHO.
MLK was called a "tom" by the libs of his own time, all of whom saw Eldridge Cleaver, Stokely Carmichael and H. Rap Brown as "real" leaders. "Burn baby burn" was their catch phrase.
Well, feel free to try.I have been listening and following closely to the "protesters" who are tearing down monuments of immoral people across the Country.
Washington and Jefferson... Slave holders. They have to come down. Teddy Roosevelt.... a white guy who fought in the Spanish American War. Clearly anti-Latino. Gotta come down. U.S. Grant.... I'm not sure, but he's a white guy. The statute has to come down.
And that brings us to MLK. He was a man of God who happened to be a serially adulterous. I mean Mike slept with a lot of women....and I mean a lot of women, but unfortunately only one of them was his wife.
So by the logic of the "protesters" doesn't MLK's monument have to come down? He was clearly immoral. He violated his vows as a Man of God.
What do you think?
dumb idea
Why? The founders were men. They were flawed. MLK was a man. He was flawed. The founders made morally questionable decisions regarding slavery. MLK violated one of the most sacred commandments of his faith over and over again.
Shouldn't we cancel MLK? He advocated non-violence. Isn't that wrong when people are burning down buildings and toppling monuments? MLK advocated whites and blacks living in harmony. That clearly won't fly when we now will have separate but equal national anthems based on skin color.
Nope. MLK must go.
Do you like the idea of separate but equal National Anthems? One for Blacks and one for Whites? I mean, it isn't water fountains or bathrooms, right?
With your MLK logic no Trump statue or monument should ever be erected.I have been listening and following closely to the "protesters" who are tearing down monuments of immoral people across the Country.
Washington and Jefferson... Slave holders. They have to come down. Teddy Roosevelt.... a white guy who fought in the Spanish American War. Clearly anti-Latino. Gotta come down. U.S. Grant.... I'm not sure, but he's a white guy. The statute has to come down.
And that brings us to MLK. He was a man of God who happened to be a serially adulterous. I mean Mike slept with a lot of women....and I mean a lot of women, but unfortunately only one of them was his wife.
So by the logic of the "protesters" doesn't MLK's monument have to come down? He was clearly immoral. He violated his vows as a Man of God.
What do you think?
I think your reasoning is as asinine as theirs.I have been listening and following closely to the "protesters" who are tearing down monuments of immoral people across the Country.
Washington and Jefferson... Slave holders. They have to come down. Teddy Roosevelt.... a white guy who fought in the Spanish American War. Clearly anti-Latino. Gotta come down. U.S. Grant.... I'm not sure, but he's a white guy. The statute has to come down.
And that brings us to MLK. He was a man of God who happened to be a serially adulterous. I mean Mike slept with a lot of women....and I mean a lot of women, but unfortunately only one of them was his wife.
So by the logic of the "protesters" doesn't MLK's monument have to come down? He was clearly immoral. He violated his vows as a Man of God.
What do you think?
Might as well, blacks arent using it anymore. They show nothing but contempt for his wordsI have been listening and following closely to the "protesters" who are tearing down monuments of immoral people across the Country.
Washington and Jefferson... Slave holders. They have to come down. Teddy Roosevelt.... a white guy who fought in the Spanish American War. Clearly anti-Latino. Gotta come down. U.S. Grant.... I'm not sure, but he's a white guy. The statute has to come down.
And that brings us to MLK. He was a man of God who happened to be a serially adulterous. I mean Mike slept with a lot of women....and I mean a lot of women, but unfortunately only one of them was his wife.
So by the logic of the "protesters" doesn't MLK's monument have to come down? He was clearly immoral. He violated his vows as a Man of God.
What do you think?
IDK........but Godzilla is pissed at New York........He found out the Duke of York was a slave trader...
Threads like this are why the Democrats are winning so big. Butthurt and race-baiting are not attractive to voters.