Anybody NOT willing to meet the left halfway, is undemocratic (small 'd') and unAmerican.anybody willing to meet the left, halfway, is a moron
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anybody NOT willing to meet the left halfway, is undemocratic (small 'd') and unAmerican.anybody willing to meet the left, halfway, is a moron
That is right, I want to be undemocratic, BEINGS HOW WE ARE A REPUBLIC!Anybody NOT willing to meet the left halfway, is undemocratic (small 'd') and unAmerican.
Read the OP and get back to me. You might want read up on our form of government, what we have is a representative, constitutional democracy.That is right, I want to be undemocratic, BEINGS HOW WE ARE A REPUBLIC!
Meeting halfway? On what? Be specific.
to be nice, you could not be more ignorant.Read the OP and get back to me. You might want read up on our form of government, what we have is a representative, constitutional democracy.
Of course, before I went off on you, I should of read your link. Typically I find that the ignorant, will link to something that prove themselves wrong. So, I followed you link and I will quote from your link. Happily, you link proves you wrong. I know there is ignorance, and I can not be sorry in saying the following, but it is a special kind of stupid that links to something that proves them wrong. In your case, you prove yourself wrong with your link. Thank you.Read the OP and get back to me. You might want read up on our form of government, what we have is a representative, constitutional democracy.
Lol…yes, yes it does sound like a petulant child…now I am thinking you’re closer to 14.
I’d love to have you come on over and shut it for me little Colin….There it is again. Another childish rebuttal because you can't support what you said. For Christ sake idiot, shut your mouth and only appear stupid instead of replying like that and remove all doubt.
Check Portland, and Seattle.Needless to say, nobody on the left is saying not to never negotiate with the right.
That's because we're not trying to justify violence by pretending the other side is irreedmably evil.
I’d love to have you come on over and shut it for me little Colin….
If you had both read and understood the linked article you would have see this structure:Of course, before I went off on you, I should of read your link. Typically I find that the ignorant, will link to something that prove themselves wrong. So, I followed you link and I will quote from your link. Happily, you link proves you wrong. I know there is ignorance, and I can not be sorry in saying the following, but it is a special kind of stupid that links to something that proves them wrong. In your case, you prove yourself wrong with your link. Thank you.
Lol…anytime junior.Someone should because you obviously can't do it yourself
Its that word EVERY in your post that stops us from ever getting anything meaningful done. I lean liberal on more things than conservative. But not All things, & am more than willing to meet in the middle on many more. And I am not the only one. The word EVERY is dishonest, not one single person knows what is in the minds of Every one. IF you only hear and believe one side of any situation you will never be well informed. That go's for the kool Aid drinkers of both party's.Let me give you an example on global warming. I was having a discussion with a friend, and we have different views on the subject. However, we actually agreed with many things that should be done. We all know GW exists, but it is a matter of if it is a natural occurrence, or caused by humans (and farting cows). He wanted cleaner air, I wanted cleaner air. He wanted clean water, and so did I. Etc, etc. There were a lot of things we agreed on. He wanted this because he thinks man is causing these changes in climate. I wanted these things because it makes sense that breathing maskless fresh air, fishing in clean lakes and streams, etc. was something everyone wanted. I felt we found a middle ground...but I was wrong. When I mentioned that there appears to be a compromise he stated that there could be no compromise until the right recognizes the issue is manmade, and that we can't start to even look any further until that was recognized. Every leftist there agreed.
So what, we are a REPUBLICIf you had both read and understood the linked article you would have see this structure:
- The 3 Major Types of Democracies
- Direct Democracy
Representative Democracy
Constitutional Democracy
Let me give you an example on global warming. I was having a discussion with a friend, and we have different views on the subject. However, we actually agreed with many things that should be done. We all know GW exists, but it is a matter of if it is a natural occurrence, or caused by humans (and farting cows). He wanted cleaner air, I wanted cleaner air. He wanted clean water, and so did I. Etc, etc. There were a lot of things we agreed on. He wanted this because he thinks man is causing these changes in climate. I wanted these things because it makes sense that breathing maskless fresh air, fishing in clean lakes and streams, etc. was something everyone wanted. I felt we found a middle ground...but I was wrong. When I mentioned that there appears to be a compromise he stated that there could be no compromise until the right recognizes the issue is manmade, and that we can't start to even look any further until that was recognized. Every leftist there agreed.
You are correct but we are also a democracy. You are a Texan but you are also an American. So far, the former does not exclude the later. Tomorrow who knows?So what, we are a REPUBLIC
We are a republic, it is that simple.You are correct but we are also a democracy. You are a Texan but you are also an American. So far, the former does not exclude the later. Tomorrow who knows?
Lol…anytime junior.