Why the rape case against Trump will end up thrown into the trash

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You believe this case is over. I see it as continuing for maybe a year or more.

He won't appeal the latest fine.

 

[WorldWatcher]

He won't appeal the latest fine.

I think he will appeal.

He will want to keep it alive to play victim and as a means of grifting as long as he can.

WW

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

He won't put up 83mm he can't get back when he loses the appeal. He will stall paying the 83mm when the 30 days run out.

 

[Arlette]

He won't put up 83mm he can't get back when he loses the appeal. He will stall paying the 83mm when the 30 days run out.

Yup

 

[AZrailwhale]

The jury didn't believe Trump

The jury wouldn't have believed Trump if he said water is wet.

 

[Arlette]

The jury wouldn't have believed Trump if he said water is wet.

Would you believe a pussy grabber?

 

[Robert W]

Already litigated and Trump lost. It's over. It won't re-litigated. You will always be identified with supporting stupidly a sexual batterer. What is wrong with you?

I find the three women to not be credible. Way too much money in it for them and if you can't see that as a problem, I can do it for you.

 

[Robert W]

Would you believe a pussy grabber?

Have you known a man in person who is not that way? Even you declared you grab asses.

 

[Arlette]

Have you known a man in person who is not that way? Even you declared you grab asses.

I pinch their asses

 

[Concerned American]

Since the defense didn't object to evidence presented during the Trial of Fact,

Difficult to dispute that which doesn't exist nor was presented. I have no horse in this race so your insinuation that I am disputing the ruling because I don't like it is far off base--I suspect more democrat creation of that which does not exist. I am simply stating what I have observed in accordance with the constitution and the laws of the land. Take it however you will. The fact that you and others on this board are disputing any alternative action that might not settle with your views appears that you are not so sure of your position.

 

[Robert W]

Would you believe a pussy grabber?

She said this.

Amna Nawaz:

The nine jurors deliberated for only a few hours before delivering their verdict and awarding Carroll $5 million.



Carroll didn't stop to talk as she left the courthouse, but said in a statement — quote — "I filed this lawsuit against Donald Trump to clear my name and to get my life back. Today, the world finally knows the truth."

 

[WorldWatcher]

I find the three women to not be credible. Way too much money in it for them and if you can't see that as a problem, I can do it for you.

You are free to have that opinion.

Doesn't change the jury decision though.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

Difficult to dispute that which doesn't exist nor was presented. I have no horse in this race so your insinuation that I am disputing the ruling because I don't like it is far off base--I suspect more democrat creation of that which does not exist. I am simply stating what I have observed in accordance with the constitution and the laws of the land. Take it however you will. The fact that you and others on this board are disputing any alternative action that might not settle with your views appears that you are not so sure of your position.

Evidence was presented.

However, POTUS#45 didn't even present a defense. I don't mean figuratively, I mean literally. The claimant presented their case, then rested. The defense CALLED NO witnesses in defense, FPOTUS#45 refused to take the stand. So the defense immediately rested. So the case basically went from the claimant phase straight to closing arguments and then to the jury.

WW

 

[Robert W]

You are free to have that opinion.

Doesn't change the jury decision though.

WW

Was the Jury unanimous?

 

[Arlette]

She said this.

Amna Nawaz:

The nine jurors deliberated for only a few hours before delivering their verdict and awarding Carroll $5 million.



Carroll didn't stop to talk as she left the courthouse, but said in a statement — quote — "I filed this lawsuit against Donald Trump to clear my name and to get my life back. Today, the world finally knows the truth."

What's your problem now?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Was the Jury unanimous?

Yes.

WW

 

[Concerned American]

However, POTUS#45 didn't even present a defense. I don't mean figuratively, I mean literally.

That is how courts work. Innocent until PROVEN guilty. There was NO evidence of guilt (or liability, for that matter) presented. An accused does not have to prove his innocence. Enough. We both have the understanding of the law. Nothing rehashed on here means anything to the case. It will be overturned or not. Nothing you or I say will change that. If the law and the constitution are followed, EJC will see nothing.

 

[Robert W]

Evidence was presented.

However, POTUS#45 didn't even present a defense. I don't mean figuratively, I mean literally. The claimant presented their case, then rested. The defense CALLED NO witnesses in defense, FPOTUS#45 refused to take the stand. So the defense immediately rested. So the case basically went from the claimant phase straight to closing arguments and then to the jury.

WW

Claims were presented. Defendants are told so often it is not even a question, do not testify even when you are innocent. Her witnesses were to her talking to them. They did not witness a thing in that Department store. Who ran the court? A Judge who wanted to convict Trump. I hope when it is Biden's turn to be prosecuted, he gets the same sort of Judge who wants Biden convicted.

 

[Robert W]

Yes.

WW

Thanks. I could not locate the polling.

 

[Robert W]

What's your problem now?

I believe it is your problem. The award was cash due to her claims. She was judged to say the facts. I am thinking a higher court will not agree. As the video I presented brings up.