Why the rape case against Trump will end up thrown into the trash

[toobfreak]

Proof of what ? That the courts dismissed Trump 60 times ?

Prove it. So far you've shown you couldn't prove the time of day.

 

[Dagosa]

Prove it. So far you've shown you couldn't prove the time of day.

You already admitted it !

 

[toobfreak]

You already admitted it !

Jackass, I said the cases that actually were adjudicated, Trump won. You are such a hapless fuckwit, you can't even keep track of the day of the week.

 

[bendog]

Jackass, I said the cases that actually were adjudicated, Trump won. You are such a hapless fuckwit, you can't even keep track of the day of the week.

name em.

 

[Dagosa]

“None of those 60 court cases (except a couple) actually looked at and adjudicated the evidence. They dismissed the cases on technical grounds refusing to try them. ”

See, bubba.your words. You admitted they dismissed 60 cases. Now you lie again and claim the courts didn’t look at evidence. You have to produce it foolish so they can look at it….so now you’re arguing that lawyers for Trump were too incompetent to use YOUR evidence that you can’t produce.

 

[Dagosa]

Jackass, I said the cases that actually were adjudicated, Trump won. You are such a hapless fuckwit, you can't even keep track of the day of the week.

No you did not. I have you quoted. Read it. Post 385.

 

[Dagosa]

Jackass, I said the cases that actually were adjudicated, Trump won. You are such a hapless fuckwit, you can't even keep track of the day of the week.

You’re the fuking dimwit. You’re asking me to prove you’re an idiot. I don’t have to. EVERYONE knows YOU have to present the evidence at the preliminary hearing….no one did.

 

[Dagosa]

Trump was given mere WEEKS to file and bring complete cases involving DOZENS of complex issues in six states! With every last i dotted and t crossed. So much for our justice system. Meanwhile, cases like OJ, Bill Cosby and others go on for years and years and years. Even this Carroll bitch, she waited 40 years to claim Trump assaulted her and can't even get the year it happened right.

Even your claims of Trump being an insurrectionist, taking papers that didn't belong to him and wrongly filing bank loan papers has taken these courts YEARS to bring to the docket. And they are still failing.

Yet the courts made a circus and a game out of protecting the integrity of our elections giving a one month deadline? SHUT YOUR STUPID PIEHOLE.

Geesus, even county polling places can come up with voter fraud evidence in days after an election.
You are asking that Trump be given all the time he needs to make up evidence of voter fraud. Weeks, is plenty of time.
YOU NEED the evidence in hand when you go to a judge bozo. Otherwise you want to be able to make up shit with no evidence at all.
.

 

[Dagosa]

You mean like posting the jury verdict form and explaining it to you, to counter you lying about the jury didn't believe her based on actual court documents?

I understand your need to tap out. But I'll be here the next time you try the "jury didn't believe her line".

Bless your heart.

WW

Defamation AND SEXUAL ABUSE. Your forms had Both charges checked off. Rape can only be charged with proof of penetration in most states. Sexual abuse which can include rape but cannot be proven later without physical evidence is an all inclusive charge. SEXAUL ABUSE is a felony charge past the statutes of limitation. That’s why there was a civil trial with a jury that decided GUILTY of both.

 

[Dagosa]

Jackass, I said the cases that actually were adjudicated, Trump won. You are such a hapless fuckwit, you can't even keep track of the day of the week.

Dufus, you’re asking a court to look at evidence that Trump lawyers could not produce 60 times.

 

[toobfreak]

name em.

So in other words, after 3.5 years of denying the facts, you admit you don't even KNOW the facts!

 

[toobfreak]

See, bubba.your words. You admitted they dismissed 60 cases.

Never said that. Prove me wrong.

Now you lie again and claim the courts didn’t look at evidence.

I never said that. You're an idiot. Are you disabled?
Is there a single leftie herer who can show even a 90 IQ?

 

[toobfreak]

No you did not. I have you quoted.

Wrong again, butthole. You truly are a buffoon. I said right here that only a couple of Trump's cases were ever actually adjudicated and he won both of those.

You are a complete jackass.

 

[toobfreak]

You’re the fuking dimwit.

^^^Typical response of the lowlife lizard butthole leftist when caught in a lie proving him wrong. So typical.

 

[toobfreak]

Geesus, even county polling places can come up with voter fraud evidence in days after an election.

Prove it! Better still, what does that have to do with attorneys getting that evidence, finding it and putting it all together across a state, multiple states, then jumping through all the hurdles trying to meet ridiculous court deadlines, some of which expired BEFORE the election?

Jeez are you a butthole. You are SUCH a butthole, I bet you have TWO of them just to keep up with all your shit.

 

[toobfreak]

Dufus, you’re asking a court to look at evidence that Trump lawyers could not produce 60 times.

It was different evidence in each case, butthole, not the SAME evidence 60 times, butthole. And it is not a matter of TRump producing it, it was a matter of getting judges to actually TRY the evidence, which most refused, afraid of how it would impact their careers and lives with throngs of you terrorists mobbing their homes rioting and threatening their families just as you did to Supreme Court Justices when they changed abortion laws back to a state decision.

You're a total asinine ignorant brainwashed butthole.

 

[forkup]

Wrong again, butthole. You truly are a buffoon. I said right here that only a couple of Trump's cases were ever actually adjudicated and he won both of those.

View attachment 898431

You are a complete jackass.

Stoddard v. City Election Commission of the City of Detroit - Wikisource, the free online library​

en.wikisource.org
By contract, plaintiffs do not offer any affidavits or specific eyewitness evidence to substantiate their assertions. Plaintiffs merely assert in their verified complaint “Hundreds or thousands of ballots were duplicated solely by Democratic party inspectors and then counted.” Plaintiffs’ allegation is mere speculation.

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020AP1930-OAfinal-12-4-20.pdf
Instead, the evidentiary support rests almost entirely on the unsworn expert report1 of a former campaign employee that offers statistical estimates based on call center samples and social media research. This petition falls far short of the kind of compelling evidence and legal support we would undoubtedly need to countenance the court-ordered disenfranchisement of every Wisconsin voter. The petition does not even justify the exercise of our original jurisdiction.

Bowyer v. Ducey - Wikisource, the free online library​

en.wikisource.org
Not only have Plaintiffs failed to provide the Court with factual support for their extraordinary claims

The Kraken lawsuit. Resulting in sanctions for the lawyers.

The Election Integrity Project of Nevada LLC, Plaintiff(s) vs. The State of Nevada on Relation of Barbara Cegavske, Defendant(s), A-20-820510-C (Nevada State, Clark County, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 26)​

Case docket: The Election Integrity Project of Nevada LLC, Plaintiff(s) vs. The State of Nevada on Relation of Barbara Cegavske, Defendant(s), A-20-820510-C in Nevada State, Clark County, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 26, last filing 02/09/2021, filed 09/01/2020.

www.docketalarm.com
a “shocking ask” to nullify Nevada’s election results and order a new election on scant evidence of voter fraud brought by a group tied to former U.S. Senate candidate and conservative activist Sharron Angle.

Judge rejects Trump campaign lawsuit seeking to block state’s presidential election results, says no evidence election was affected by fraud - The Nevada Independent​

El juez James Russell emitió un fallo en contra de la solicitud sin precedentes de la campaña de Trump para bloquear la certificación de los resultados.

thenevadaindependent.com
Russell wrote that he found the evidence offered by the Trump campaign to have “little to no value,” and failed to provide under any standard of proof that the campaign’s long list of alleged fraud and vote irregularities could be backed up under any evidentiary standard.


Feel free to look around. Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

All instances where judge ruled on the evidence and found it wanting.




I'll help.

 

[g5000]

A Jury decided Trump did not rape E. Jean Carroll.

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll​

 

[g5000]

A Jury decided Trump did not rape E. Jean Carroll. Bet you did not know that.
Here is a video that shows the facts of this case. Evaluate it honestly. Do not presume guilt. The Jury did not presume guilt. So you should not.

This ACCOUNTANT, not a LAWYER, also has a video asking if Michelle Obama is a man.

You hitched your tard wagon to a real dipshit, dumbass.

 

[Robert W]

This ACCOUNTANT, not a LAWYER, also has a video asking if Michelle Obama is a man.

You hitched your tard wagon to a real dipshit, dumbass.

Thanks. I doubt I watch that one but apparently you did.