Why the growing use of JUNK MAIL VOTING is so full of fraud!

[healthmyths]

You're saying there is POTENTIAL fraud, not that there has been ACTUAL fraud of any significance. Very different animals. Certainly the former is true but so is the later. Making mail-in ballots more restrictive is a solution in search of a problem.

Math and statistics prove beyond any doubt there was organized substantial election fraud. Experts on election fraud measuring 7 key indicators, only 3 of which need to be observed to confirm election fraud, noted that all 7 were observed in the Dem's fraudulent 2020 steal.

As much as I personally believe what you write, please provide substantiation as I did a search for the 7 key indicators.
Please provide as it further substantiates what I believe. The Benford's Law on Detection fo Election fraud proves it!

Fact check: Deviation from Benfordâs Law does not prove election fraud

Social media users have been sharing posts that say a mathematical rule called Benford’s Law provides clear proof of fraud in the U.S. presidential election. However, research papers and academics consulted by Reuters consistently say that deviation from Benford’s Law does not prove election...

www.reuters.com

The posts, such as those here and here , show graphs that compare candidate’s vote tallies by leading digit to the expected distribution according to Benford’s law in order to contend that Biden’s vote tallies do not follow Benford’s Law but Trump’s do.

 

[alang1216]

We routinely mock the left and their demand for a link to things that were widely reported. Come here...

That's fair since the Left routinely mocks those that confuse the possibility of fraud with the proof of fraud.

 

[alang1216]

“The handwritten signature is, frankly, a b******* form of authentication,” Siciliano says. “It really has no security value whatsoever, and that applies to all handwritten signatures. Do you think the clerk behind the counter at Wal-Mart is skilled at handwriting analysis? You think, of the hundreds of signatures she looks at every day, she’ll notice the one that’s an imitation? It’s a completely false sense of security.”

Statistics Archives | CreditCards.com

Stay on top of the latest credit card trends by exploring our proprietary data and industry reports curated by our team of experts.

www.creditcards.com

So with the growing absentee voting trend and politicians WHO know the above to be true, are we really going to have "fair and balanced" elections in the future with more and more absentee balloting?

Look at the attached and tell me the same person signed both documents.
Then consider Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

The election office mailed JUNK MAIL BALLOTS to the voting rolls they had.
10% of Americans move per year, in 4 years that could be nearly 40% invalid addresses.
2) The unsolicited (as in absentee ballot) ballot goes to an address that MAY not have the original voter living there any longer.
3) Given the stupidity of most Democrat voters especially knowing that signing a ballot fraudulently could cause imprisonment, these idiots sign and drop in the mail.
4) Election workers than look supposedly at the signature on file and the signed ballot... these workers are NOT experts, much less qualified to verify a signature and in most cases have accepted fraudulent, forged signatures.
5) The ballot is considered valid and counted.
View attachment 478419

You're saying there is POTENTIAL fraud, not that there has been ACTUAL fraud of any significance. Very different animals. Certainly the former is true but so is the later. Making mail-in ballots more restrictive is a solution in search of a problem.

There was massive and obvious fraud.

So massive and obvious that no one can prove it even though many have tried. Got it.

 

[alang1216]

Of course all the signatures were not verified on the tens of millions of mail in ballots.

and they shouldn't be, but the republicans swear on the signatures.

You're saying there is POTENTIAL fraud, not that there has been ACTUAL fraud of any significance. Very different animals. Certainly the former is true but so is the later. Making mail-in ballots more restrictive is a solution in search of a problem.

ACTUAL fraud of any significance will not be detected unless there are checks in the system that will detect it. The bar owner that doesn't card his customers can easily make the claim that his bar doesn't have a problem with under age drinking.

I am thinking to recount TX and FL next time and every time from now on.

If there is significant fraud due to mailed in ballets, a recount will not catch it.

You post as if you think it's not possible to place safeguards on mail in ballots. Ballots are not like grocery store coupons that anyone can use. They're coded and can be verified by signatures and scanners and are only mailed out to verified addresses of registered voters.

Not true. Many households received ballots for past residents and dead people.

One should have to request a ballot. Universal mail in balloting is garbage.

How many of those past residents or dead people actually cast a vote? What you fail to understand is that not many individuals will risk a felony to cast a single vote.

When an illegal ballet can be simply dropped in the mail, it can be virtually impossible to trace that ballot back to the person that cast the illegal vote.

As to signature verification, if the signatures are scrutinized very strictly, then a relatively high percentage of legitimate votes will be thrown out because a person's signature can vary. If the signatures are not scrutinized strictly, then non-legit ballots can get through the system.

Unless they throw the checkers out in the middle of the night with one candidate winning . Wake up in the morning Shazam, the other candidate miraculously bolted ahead. And every single state that shut down ended up flipping . A miracle? Coincidence? Or a dirty Democrat was counting . What would you bet your money on ?

That you've been fed misinformation. Every instance you can cite has been looked at and charges of fraud have been dismissed. It is no coincidence that Giuliani never provided any evidence of fraud, the best he as able to do was challenge procedures and he lost almost every time.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Of course all the signatures were not verified on the tens of millions of mail in ballots.

and they shouldn't be, but the republicans swear on the signatures.

You're saying there is POTENTIAL fraud, not that there has been ACTUAL fraud of any significance. Very different animals. Certainly the former is true but so is the later. Making mail-in ballots more restrictive is a solution in search of a problem.

ACTUAL fraud of any significance will not be detected unless there are checks in the system that will detect it. The bar owner that doesn't card his customers can easily make the claim that his bar doesn't have a problem with under age drinking.

I am thinking to recount TX and FL next time and every time from now on.

If there is significant fraud due to mailed in ballets, a recount will not catch it.

You post as if you think it's not possible to place safeguards on mail in ballots. Ballots are not like grocery store coupons that anyone can use. They're coded and can be verified by signatures and scanners and are only mailed out to verified addresses of registered voters.

Not true. Many households received ballots for past residents and dead people.

One should have to request a ballot. Universal mail in balloting is garbage.

How many of those past residents or dead people actually cast a vote? What you fail to understand is that not many individuals will risk a felony to cast a single vote.

When an illegal ballet can be simply dropped in the mail, it can be virtually impossible to trace that ballot back to the person that cast the illegal vote.

As to signature verification, if the signatures are scrutinized very strictly, then a relatively high percentage of legitimate votes will be thrown out because a person's signature can vary. If the signatures are not scrutinized strictly, then non-legit ballots can get through the system.

Unless they throw the checkers out in the middle of the night with one candidate winning . Wake up in the morning Shazam, the other candidate miraculously bolted ahead. And every single state that shut down ended up flipping . A miracle? Coincidence? Or a dirty Democrat was counting . What would you bet your money on ?

That you've been fed misinformation. Every instance you can cite has been looked at and charges of fraud have been dismissed. It is no coincidence that Giuliani never provided any evidence of fraud, the best he as able to do was challenge procedures and he lost almost every time.

Oh STFU. misinformation my ass.

 

[alang1216]

That you've been fed misinformation. Every instance you can cite has been looked at and charges of fraud have been dismissed. It is no coincidence that Giuliani never provided any evidence of fraud, the best he as able to do was challenge procedures and he lost almost every time.

Oh STFU. misinformation my ass.

Don't tell me I'm wrong, that means nothing , show me I'm wrong, that means something.

 

[BluesLegend]

We routinely mock the left and their demand for a link to things that were widely reported. Come here...

That's fair since the Left routinely mocks those that confuse the possibility of fraud with the proof of fraud.

 

[Dragonlady]

You're saying there is POTENTIAL fraud, not that there has been ACTUAL fraud of any significance. Very different animals. Certainly the former is true but so is the later. Making mail-in ballots more restrictive is a solution in search of a problem.

ACTUAL fraud of any significance will not be detected unless there are checks in the system that will detect it. The bar owner that doesn't card his customers can easily make the claim that his bar doesn't have a problem with under age drinking.

There are checks in the system that detected. All kinds of them them.

All of the ballots were verified and those verifications were confirmed by the poll watchers. Every single pallet was confirmed, all of the signatures were verified. Those with issues were pulled and not counted.

Keep posting lies that none of this happened and there were no verifications. Gawd but you people are easily fooled. You never verify anything or check up on anything you just go along with whatever you’re told no matter how ridiculous

 

[Dragonlady]

Of course all the signatures were not verified on the tens of millions of mail in ballots.

and they shouldn't be, but the republicans swear on the signatures.

You're saying there is POTENTIAL fraud, not that there has been ACTUAL fraud of any significance. Very different animals. Certainly the former is true but so is the later. Making mail-in ballots more restrictive is a solution in search of a problem.

ACTUAL fraud of any significance will not be detected unless there are checks in the system that will detect it. The bar owner that doesn't card his customers can easily make the claim that his bar doesn't have a problem with under age drinking.

I am thinking to recount TX and FL next time and every time from now on.

If there is significant fraud due to mailed in ballets, a recount will not catch it.

You post as if you think it's not possible to place safeguards on mail in ballots. Ballots are not like grocery store coupons that anyone can use. They're coded and can be verified by signatures and scanners and are only mailed out to verified addresses of registered voters.

Not true. Many households received ballots for past residents and dead people.

One should have to request a ballot. Universal mail in balloting is garbage.

How many of those past residents or dead people actually cast a vote? What you fail to understand is that not many individuals will risk a felony to cast a single vote.

When an illegal ballet can be simply dropped in the mail, it can be virtually impossible to trace that ballot back to the person that cast the illegal vote.

As to signature verification, if the signatures are scrutinized very strictly, then a relatively high percentage of legitimate votes will be thrown out because a person's signature can vary. If the signatures are not scrutinized strictly, then non-legit ballots can get through the system.

Unless they throw the checkers out in the middle of the night with one candidate winning . Wake up in the morning Shazam, the other candidate miraculously bolted ahead. And every single state that shut down ended up flipping . A miracle? Coincidence? Or a dirty Democrat was counting . What would you bet your money on ?

That you've been fed misinformation. Every instance you can cite has been looked at and charges of fraud have been dismissed. It is no coincidence that Giuliani never provided any evidence of fraud, the best he as able to do was challenge procedures and he lost almost every time.

Oh STFU. misinformation my ass.

Is that all you have? You do know that Giuliani had his license to practice law suspended for lying, both in court and outside the court.