"Why Stop There?", CNN Advocates Mass Censorship

justinacolmena

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
5,106
Reaction score
1,514
Points
140
Location
alaska, usa
Once a party that fought for free speech,
When did the Democrat gentlemen ever fight for free speech, except by naked ladies of the district?
it has become the party demanding Internet censorship and hate speech laws.
The Democrat Party has always repressed actual speech and arguments on the right, while promoting left-wing pornography.
 

LA RAM FAN

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
37,182
Reaction score
6,503
Points
1,130
Darcy wrote:
“Nearly every tweet from the president at this point is labeled for misinfo. Which had me thinking. Why doesn’t Twitter just take the step of labeling his entire account as a known source of election disinfo? And why stop there? Why not label accounts that repeatedly spread claims the platform has to fact-check?”
There was a time from the very touchstone of American journalism was the rejection of such calls for censorship, including at CNN.

What is chilling about Darcy’s writings is that they reflect the view of many now in Congress and in the Democratic Party. Indeed, they reflect many in the Biden campaign. Once a party that fought for free speech, it has become the party demanding Internet censorship and hate speech laws. President-Elect Joe Biden has called for speech controls and recently appointed a transition head for agency media issues that is one of the most pronounced anti-free speech figures in the United States. It is a trend that seems now to be find support in the media, which celebrated the speech of French President Emmanuel Macron before Congress where he called on the United States to follow the model of Europe on hate speech.



They propagandists have already surpassed Soviet Union, even there the media did not flag every comment made by their "elected" leader. Since when has the media determined fact from fiction anyway? They are not able to tell their ass from the ground.

The communists are removing their masks at a higher and higher pace.
Yeah it’s a dangerous world we live in when the media decides what we can hear by cutting off the president in mid sentence.
 

Mac-7

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
21,268
Reaction score
14,725
Points
1,365
Truth is an objective, verifiable fact, and it has been verified over and over that there was no massive voter fraud.
Thats simply not true

the judges dismissed the cases but that is not proof that no fraud exists

any reasonable person can see that the election was irregular, as have been other elections in the past which always favored the democrat candidate

this has to stop

someday you are going to realize that the democrats never lose anymore just as they never lose in california or red china

you might even complain but it will be far too late to ever return to fair and honest elections

but this time you got what you wanted so to hell with anything else, right?
 

Mac-7

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
21,268
Reaction score
14,725
Points
1,365
I've never been a knee jerk Democrat or lefty or whatever tag you have put on me.
You are a democrat now since you support the new one-party dictatorship

so any complaints you have in the future are just CYA for what you have done now
 

OldLady

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
65,609
Reaction score
16,392
Points
2,220
Truth is an objective, verifiable fact, and it has been verified over and over that there was no massive voter fraud.
Thats simply not true

the judges dismissed the cases but that is not proof that no fraud exists

any reasonable person can see that the election was irregular, as have been other elections in the past which always favored the democrat candidate

this has to stop

someday you are going to realize that the democrats never lose anymore just as they never lose in california or red china

you might even complain but it will be far too late to ever return to fair and honest elections

but this time you got what you wanted so to hell with anything else, right?
Codswallop. Your guy sucked. The down ballot voting should tell you everything you need to know about what happened.
 

Mac-7

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
21,268
Reaction score
14,725
Points
1,365
Your guy sucked.
And biden doesnt suck?

you hate trump for his personality

But a stolen election does not a president make

biden is the figurehead of a devious and corrupt party that wants bring America down and give global rule to china, russia, iran and venezuala

with maybe the euros thrown in as junior partners

one man has mannerisms that offend you

the other will ensure that your grandchildren never enjoy the high standard of living that you have
 

Mac-7

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
21,268
Reaction score
14,725
Points
1,365
Abject silliness is your specialty
NOt at all

if you will muzzle trump sooner or later you will extent that policy to everyone who does not think like you do
 

Beef_Supreme

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
2,006
Reaction score
2,213
Points
1,938
What's wrong with what Darcy says? Again, the 1st Amendment is not a license to say anything you want with no possibility of repercussions. That's not the way it works. Social media is a sewer.
Are we going to license libel and slander as norms? Because that's a lot of what comes out of Trump's tweets. Twitter is a private company. They have every right to set their own TOS.
If Trump doesn't like it, he's free to go elsewhere.
The media lecturing others about libel, slander, and saying things without fear of repercussions is the height of hypocrisy.
 

Godboy

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
19,922
Reaction score
5,663
Points
280
Freedom of speech is not freedom to lie...
Yes it is. I dont like liars and fake news any more than you, but people have the freedom to say shit that isnt true. News networks do it frequently.
 

badbob85037

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2018
Messages
1,054
Reaction score
820
Points
1,928
Darcy wrote:
“Nearly every tweet from the president at this point is labeled for misinfo. Which had me thinking. Why doesn’t Twitter just take the step of labeling his entire account as a known source of election disinfo? And why stop there? Why not label accounts that repeatedly spread claims the platform has to fact-check?”
There was a time from the very touchstone of American journalism was the rejection of such calls for censorship, including at CNN.

What is chilling about Darcy’s writings is that they reflect the view of many now in Congress and in the Democratic Party. Indeed, they reflect many in the Biden campaign. Once a party that fought for free speech, it has become the party demanding Internet censorship and hate speech laws. President-Elect Joe Biden has called for speech controls and recently appointed a transition head for agency media issues that is one of the most pronounced anti-free speech figures in the United States. It is a trend that seems now to be find support in the media, which celebrated the speech of French President Emmanuel Macron before Congress where he called on the United States to follow the model of Europe on hate speech.



They propagandists have already surpassed Soviet Union, even there the media did not flag every comment made by their "elected" leader. Since when has the media determined fact from fiction anyway? They are not able to tell their ass from the ground.

The communists are removing their masks at a higher and higher pace.
CNN not having a problem fabricating 'truth' to dumber than tree stump stumps will one day turn to a cryfest of drooling idiots that can't stop from soiling them self long enough to pick their nose but still find the time to scratch their ass, chew their fingernails till they bleed a typical double jointed elf with a left one half an inch longer than the other one. your date.
 

LeftofLeft

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
13,487
Reaction score
5,091
Points
350
The same people giving Twitter and Facebook a pass over censorship and free speech issues are the same people that lose their shit over the notion that an NFL Team telling its employees that it must stand or remain in the locker room during the playing of the National Anthem.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top