Why Shouldn't The VP Have Unilateral Power To Overturn Elections??

Democrats would never do anything like that.


Sincerely,


See the source image

See the source image


See the source image



 
Sincerely,


See the source image

See the source image


See the source image



Yea, Jussie Smollett is exactly the same thing as 100 Republican congressman, the president and a dozen other Trump admin folks trying to overthrow the election...

This is why I have ZERO respect for whatever bullshit Trumpers pull out of their ass....by the way, Jussie was convicted....and not by a "Conservative activist Judge or prosecutor" -- so even your whataboutism is a failure
 
“On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all the electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all."

What part of this is Constitutional??

The VP does not have the authority to declare ANYTHING unconstitutional.....or are we saying the VP is now on par with the federal courts?


Furthermore....would you have that same energy if Kamala does EXACTLY WHAT GYM JORDAN asked Pence to do?

Clearly that IS what the VP is supposed to do if he believes necessary.
Otherwise, why bother mentioning the VP as certifying.
But then if the VP is unhappy with the vote, it is the states who then resolve it, not the VP.
Someone has to be able to pull the alarm, and clearly that is the VP.
The fact the VP then no longer has any part in it, is irrelevant.
 
Clearly that IS what the VP is supposed to do if he believes necessary.
Otherwise, why bother mentioning the VP as certifying.
But then if the VP is unhappy with the vote, it is the states who then resolve it, not the VP.
Someone has to be able to pull the alarm, and clearly that is the VP.
The fact the VP then no longer has any part in it, is irrelevant.
The law is clear on how objections are handled. The VP has no say on the matter unless perhaps there is a tie in in the Senate on whether or not to accept an objection. He has no unilateral power to disregard the certified vote of a state, period.
 
Pence answered it like he was talking to a child, without answering it.


“I wouldn’t want any one person to have that authority,” Pence told Trump

Well no shit, Mike. Welcome to 250 years ago. Now explain why, to the Manchild. Why didn't you explain why?

But Mike didn't explain. He knew that was pointless. He knew he was dealing with a person driven by ego and powerlust. So he just found different ways of saying "No. I said no. You heard me. No. "

To the freaking President of the United States. "No, no". No explanation forthcoming, just as no demand of an explanation was expected from the incapable president.


It falls in line with what I always say:

Nobody thinks less of Trump NOR of his followers than the people around Trump who are conning Trump and them and enabling him.

If a Trump cultist could just realize this, they just might wake up. Have a moment of clarity.
 
Last edited:
The law is clear on how objections are handled. The VP has no say on the matter unless perhaps there is a tie in in the Senate on whether or not to accept an objection. He has no unilateral power to disregard the certified vote of a state, period.
Nobody asked him to disregard any certification.

Three states sent legally valid requests to allow them another ten days to investigate and review the validity of their certifications.

So quit lying.
 
The law is clear on how objections are handled. The VP has no say on the matter unless perhaps there is a tie in in the Senate on whether or not to accept an objection. He has no unilateral power to disregard the certified vote of a state, period.
that’s been debunked
 
There is a difference between overturning election and auditing an election.

Remember, it is not who votes that determines a winner. It is the people that count the votes.

In 2020 there was significant evidence that the Democrats had used the pandemic to cover up the scam of fraudulent mail in and harvested ballots counted by Democrats, in Democrat controlled swing districts. Because of that dishonesty the American had an election stolen from them and that is despicable.

We needed a Congressional audit to determine the legitimacy of the election but the Swamp was so anxious to get rid of Trump and his America First agenda that it was not allowed to happen.
 
Hahaha Those aren't States that did that. Those were partisan legislators doing the bidding of the Neo-GOP. None of what they presented represented a legal, legitimate or valid challenge to the States certified EC vote. There was no valid challenge in any state.
 
but you said "legally valid." There's a date for certification, and it had passed.
there is nothing illegal about their request. It was legally valid to request more time

this just proves the states were very concerned
 
there is nothing illegal about their request. It was legally valid to request more time

this just proves the states were very concerned
If they had any evidence, an ongoing valid court proceeding could have been used like in 1960 when Hawaii had issues certifying and there were ongoing court challenges at the time......
 

Forum List

Back
Top