Why Republicans keep talking about Amy Coney Barrett’s 7 kids

Basically, as a buffer to counter the legitimate criticism for her far rightwing views that'll lead to Republicans obstruct justice and enact their radical will on the country...


The woman is eminently qualified, get over yourself.

define eminently qualified

the handmaiden doesn't seem very qualified to me, she seems like a housewife with a love for capital

Most likely this time next week she'll be the newest Supreme Justice

Lol.....poor you

You understand democrats will pack the court, right/

We've been here before
Joe Biden said that's a boneheaded idea. Ginsburg said it was wrong.

Why anyone would be taking Ginsburg seriously in 2020 i have no idea

Her political incompetence is the reason this is even a discussion

Biden is a wildcard
 
Basically, as a buffer to counter the legitimate criticism for her far rightwing views that'll lead to Republicans obstruct justice and enact their radical will on the country...


The woman is eminently qualified, get over yourself.

define eminently qualified

the handmaiden doesn't seem very qualified to me, she seems like a housewife with a love for capital

Most likely this time next week she'll be the newest Supreme Justice

Lol.....poor you

You understand democrats will pack the court, right/

We've been here before


They have to win first idiot.

.

Sooner or later they will, and the incentives won't change
 
Basically, as a buffer to counter the legitimate criticism for her far rightwing views that'll lead to Republicans obstruct justice and enact their radical will on the country...


The woman is eminently qualified, get over yourself.

define eminently qualified

the handmaiden doesn't seem very qualified to me, she seems like a housewife with a love for capital

Most likely this time next week she'll be the newest Supreme Justice

Lol.....poor you

You understand democrats will pack the court, right/

We've been here before


They have to win first idiot.

.

Sooner or later they will, and the incentives won't change


Hopefully it will be long after I'm gone.

.
 
Having 9 justices on the court is unacceptable to the left because they don't get the rulings they want so they plan to add justices until they get the rulings they want, the constitution be damned. IOW, they simply want to turn the SC into another branch of the democrat party because they don't like anyone standing in the way of implementing their agenda for the country.
You have not provided a single rule, much-less a change to said rule.

Again, what RULE are they changing?
"The rules of the game" refers to changing the way things are done because the party changing things can't get what they want unless they change the way things are done. Do you understand that? If you're going down the tiresome road that there is no Constitutional prohibition against adding justices, have at it. Doesn't matter at all. The voters are used to 9 justices and both parties abiding by the decisions of them. The democrats want to change that because they are weenies.
 
Ted Cruz was asking about her kids' piano lessons.

Let's talk about that when they become concert pianist's, Ok Ted? What a blowhard he is.
Wow! Take care of that misplaced anger. Try not to flip out and shoot people in a blind rage.

Projecting much? He doesn't sound angry or flipped out at all. His comment is very reasonable. What does this kid's piano lessons have to do with this mother's qualifications or fitness for the SC? You seem to be projecting Republican anger, and willingness to open fire in a blind rage, onto Democrats.

But the focus of the Republican Senators on ACB's family had the effect of making the sane reasonable people question why they didn't want to talk about her qualifications and suitability for the court. What are they covering up?

Looks like you shot yourself in the foot with that one. A self-inflicted wound.
How much did the democrats talk about her paper trail, her record, vs what they were afraid she might do to their precious sacred cows?
 
At least the Democrats are supporting the things that the American people have said time and time again they support in massive numbers: Gay marriage has 63% support among the population. 80% of Americans support Roe v. Wade, and the voters have overwhelming voted for the ACA every time it's been on the ballot, including 2018.

Democrats are willing to accept the will of the people and work for minority rights. Republicans are trying to thwart that will and strip blacks, women and gays of the progress they have made in achieving equal rights and freedoms under the law, even if they have to lie, cheat and steal to do it.
:fu: Talk about stripping blacks, gays and women of their rights is boilerplate bullshit that might go down
well at a Joe Biden rally but it's just tired, dishonest, hoary rhetoric.

Republicans aren't for ending gay marriage or Roe v. Wade and the ACA is an unenforceable mess that is due for a complete house cleaning. Do you know the policy geniuses that put the ACA together have always
acknowledged that it is designed to fail?

Put the liquor bottle down.

One only need look at the long lines to vote in predominently black neighbourhoods, and the efforts that Republicans have taken to keep minorities and the poor from voting to put a lie to your assertions that Republicans aren't out to strip rights. White people don't have to wait in line for 7 hours in the suburbs.

There at least a half dozen pieces of anti-abortion legislation heading to the SC as we speak to see what bullshit that is. Or the attacks coming against gay marriage.

Democrats aren't as gullible as you fools. They actually pay attention to what is happening and don't just take the word of the President that there is nothing to see here.
Show us some long lines. While you're at it, show us her written opinions that demonstrate why you're so afraid of her?
 

Forum List

Back
Top