Why No "Travon Martin" Level of Attention???

[PoliticalChic]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a function in brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

'Cause it doesn't fit the story line that this is an evil, racist nation, where the police are out to shoot unarmed black youth who walk around with their hands up.

 

[Nutz]

I'm outraged

How do you want to spin this?

Blacks are evil
Our youth is out of control
Psychos are on the loose

This story just proves there is no such thing as white crime and there are never sensational stories about white people killing one another (unless they are shooting up a school or something).

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks"

Hmmm......seems to have hit a nerve.

Why is that?

What am I protesting, little lady? Me thinks the lady is on the rag and can't think straight.

 

[ogibillm]

and i thought this thread was about a "hypocritical" lack of outrage.

so i'm just curious - who should be the target of the outrage? i've got my sign supplies ready, what should the signs say? where/who should i picket? what's the societal injustice at play here?

Infraction: as you know, your use of the third word in the post is in error.
"fact not in evidence."

you keep deflecting, showing your lack of an answer.

so again, just to be nice, i'll ask - if you're upset about a lack of outrage, who do you believe people should be outraged with? if it's a lack of protests, who do you believe should be protested?

Deflecting????

You lying low-life, I have the gut to speak the truth, and you keep pretending you don't understand the import of the OP.

no i understand. you somehow think that there should be outrage over the killing, and that the lack of outrage shows some sort of racism

now, try to understand what i'm asking you - if you are expecting people to be upset, protesting, marching in the street, what is it you expect them to be upset, protesting, and marching in the street about?

see, with trayvon martin and michael brown you had the killers remain free. you had the public with the impression, right or wrong, that the police believed that because the unarmed deceased was black he did something to deserve it and the shooter should remain free.

people protested a perceived inequity in the justice system.

what would you have them protest here?
can you answer, or will you deflect and result to childish insults you are likely copying and pasting from elsewhere?

You're lying.

You know exactly the double standard on display in the level of attention this story has gotten.

Amazing the dishonesty, the obfuscation, the tortuous posts Liberals can generate when their malevolence is exposed.

who would you direct the outrage against, PC? clearly this killing has you upset, what's the institution that is the object of your ire?

 

[sealybobo]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

I don't deny this. In fact I've been telling black people its getting harder and harder for us liberals to defend them. They called me a racist ******. It was nuts. Do you know him? I told them poor people need to stop having kids they can't afford or raise properly. Hate to agree with you republican cock suckers but even a broke clock is right twice a day

 

[ogibillm]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

do you think there is a racial component to the killing? was there ever any indication that the murderer in this case would get away with the crime because of the race of the deceased?

 

[Rocko]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

I don't deny this. In fact I've been telling black people its getting harder and harder for us liberals to defend them. They called me a racist ******. It was nuts. Do you know him? I told them poor people need to stop having kids they can't afford or raise properly. Hate to agree with you republican cock suckers but even a broke clock is right twice a day

I think you're talking about nutz. I never had a problem with him - to me he's always come across a level headed guy, although we may not always agree on everything.

 

[Rocko]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

do you think there is a racial component to the killing? was there ever any indication that the murderer in this case would get away with the crime because of the race of the deceased?

Whenever the killer is white - the left always assumes the killing was racially motivated, regardless of evidence or the lack thereof. If you're assuming people just get off because of the color of thier skin than you have an irrational distrust of our justice system.

 

[sealybobo]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

I don't deny this. In fact I've been telling black people its getting harder and harder for us liberals to defend them. They called me a racist ******. It was nuts. Do you know him? I told them poor people need to stop having kids they can't afford or raise properly. Hate to agree with you republican cock suckers but even a broke clock is right twice a day

I think you're talking a doubt nutz. I never had a problem with him - to me he's always come across a level headed guy, although we may not always agree on everything.

He hates me. Probably because I was really rude. Lol but I do make a good point when I ask why so many poor black people are having kids and not raising them. This is where all the welfare and crime is coming from. Detroit saginaw and flint. And he doesn't get it that he can't say more whites do it when for every 1 of them there are 10 of us so of course.

And from what I see in metro Detroit is that 90% of the crime is coming from them. Maybe when you count all the white on white crime in Alaska that cancels out some of their crime but still from where I'm sitting seems like blacks are the main perpetrators of violent crime.

 

[ogibillm]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

do you think there is a racial component to the killing? was there ever any indication that the murderer in this case would get away with the crime because of the race of the deceased?

Whenever the killer is white - the left always assumes the killing was racially motivated, regardless of evidence or the lack thereof. If you're assuming people just gets off because of the color of thier skin than you have an irrational distrust of our justice system.

that's hardly true. you can point to a few cases from the last couple years, and i can guarantee those weren't the only cases of blacks being killed by whites.

but what you had with martin was a case where an unarmed kid was shot and killed by a man who wasn't arrested and for a long time didn't face charges. if those roles had been reversed, do you think that would have been the way things happened?

with brown you had an unarmed kid shot by a cop, several times, with reports that he was surrendering. the cop wasn't questioned. he drove himself from the scene. he didn't face any disciplinary actions. people questioned the impartiality of the police.

but what's the outrage to be had here? one kid kills another, is arrested, and will be charged with first degree murder. what's to protest? where's the inequity in the justice system, perceived or real?

 

[sealybobo]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

do you think there is a racial component to the killing? was there ever any indication that the murderer in this case would get away with the crime because of the race of the deceased?

Whenever the killer is white - the left always assumes the killing was racially motivated, regardless of evidence or the lack thereof. If you're assuming people just get off because of the color of thier skin than you have an irrational distrust of our justice system.

The circumstances matter ****

 

[Rocko]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

I don't deny this. In fact I've been telling black people its getting harder and harder for us liberals to defend them. They called me a racist ******. It was nuts. Do you know him? I told them poor people need to stop having kids they can't afford or raise properly. Hate to agree with you republican cock suckers but even a broke clock is right twice a day

I think you're talking a doubt nutz. I never had a problem with him - to me he's always come across a level headed guy, although we may not always agree on everything.

He hates me. Probably because I was really rude. Lol but I do make a good point when I ask why so many poor black people are having kids and not raising them. This is where all the welfare and crime is coming from. Detroit saginaw and flint. And he doesn't get it that he can't say more whites do it when for every 1 of them there are 10 of us so of course.

And from what I see in metro Detroit is that 90% of the crime is coming from them. Maybe when you count all the white on white crime in Alaska that cancels out some of their crime but still from where I'm sitting seems like blacks are the main perpetrators of violent crime.

I think you're right. In my opinion more needs to be done to address and suficently deal with the probelms that plague the black community...and when I say problems I don't mean white racism. .Im referring to what you're talking about.

 

[Big Black Dog]

Why? Because Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson can't make any money from hyping up the story.

 

[Rocko]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

do you think there is a racial component to the killing? was there ever any indication that the murderer in this case would get away with the crime because of the race of the deceased?

Whenever the killer is white - the left always assumes the killing was racially motivated, regardless of evidence or the lack thereof. If you're assuming people just gets off because of the color of thier skin than you have an irrational distrust of our justice system.

that's hardly true. you can point to a few cases from the last couple years, and i can guarantee those weren't the only cases of blacks being killed by whites.

but what you had with martin was a case where an unarmed kid was shot and killed by a man who wasn't arrested and for a long time didn't face charges. if those roles had been reversed, do you think that would have been the way things happened?

with brown you had an unarmed kid shot by a cop, several times, with reports that he was surrendering. the cop wasn't questioned. he drove himself from the scene. he didn't face any disciplinary actions. people questioned the impartiality of the police.

but what's the outrage to be had here? one kid kills another, is arrested, and will be charged with first degree murder. what's to protest? where's the inequity in the justice system, perceived or real?

Had Trayvon Martin been white and Zimmerman black, with the circumstances being the same - the story would have never made national news.

 

[rightwinger]

I'm outraged

How do you want to spin this?

Blacks are evil
Our youth is out of control
Psychos are on the loose

Did you question the Travon Martin or Michael Brown media circuses as "Whites are evil"?

That makes you a hypocrite, doesn't it.

You failed to answer

What spin are you looking for?

I post facts.....and that's what enrages you.
Causes you to lie, too.


Now, let's give you a vocabulary quiz.
Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

Where is any truth altered, you dope?

I see you failed to answer a simple question once again


So, riddle me this batman

Who is going to spend more time in jail, Zimmerman or the kid who took the selfie?

 

[ogibillm]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

do you think there is a racial component to the killing? was there ever any indication that the murderer in this case would get away with the crime because of the race of the deceased?

Whenever the killer is white - the left always assumes the killing was racially motivated, regardless of evidence or the lack thereof. If you're assuming people just gets off because of the color of thier skin than you have an irrational distrust of our justice system.

that's hardly true. you can point to a few cases from the last couple years, and i can guarantee those weren't the only cases of blacks being killed by whites.

but what you had with martin was a case where an unarmed kid was shot and killed by a man who wasn't arrested and for a long time didn't face charges. if those roles had been reversed, do you think that would have been the way things happened?

with brown you had an unarmed kid shot by a cop, several times, with reports that he was surrendering. the cop wasn't questioned. he drove himself from the scene. he didn't face any disciplinary actions. people questioned the impartiality of the police.

but what's the outrage to be had here? one kid kills another, is arrested, and will be charged with first degree murder. what's to protest? where's the inequity in the justice system, perceived or real?

Had Trayvon Martin been white and Zimmerman black, with the circumstances being the same - the story would have never made national news.

Maybe. But i also suspect the situation wouldn't have happened, and if it had the black shooter may have at least had to go to the station for questioning.

Either way we are just speculating, which is hardly the basis for any real argument

 

[Nutz]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

I don't deny this. In fact I've been telling black people its getting harder and harder for us liberals to defend them. They called me a racist ******. It was nuts. Do you know him? I told them poor people need to stop having kids they can't afford or raise properly. Hate to agree with you republican cock suckers but even a broke clock is right twice a day

I think you're talking about nutz. I never had a problem with him - to me he's always come across a level headed guy, although we may not always agree on everything.

It is because I respond in-kind. You are a cool dude, Rocko....

Sealysuckacock is nothing but a racist ******.

 

[Rocko]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

I don't deny this. In fact I've been telling black people its getting harder and harder for us liberals to defend them. They called me a racist ******. It was nuts. Do you know him? I told them poor people need to stop having kids they can't afford or raise properly. Hate to agree with you republican cock suckers but even a broke clock is right twice a day

I think you're talking about nutz. I never had a problem with him - to me he's always come across a level headed guy, although we may not always agree on everything.

It is because I respond in-kind. You are a cool dude, Rocko....

Sealysuckacock is nothing but a racist ******.

Thanks bro, I think you're cool as well. I really don't know the other poster. I think on the subject of racism people have the tendency of letting their emotions get the best of them and sometimes they say things they may not mean. A few times I've allowed that to happen to myself and I regreted it later. Hopefully I've grown from that.

 

[Nutz]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

I don't deny this. In fact I've been telling black people its getting harder and harder for us liberals to defend them. They called me a racist ******. It was nuts. Do you know him? I told them poor people need to stop having kids they can't afford or raise properly. Hate to agree with you republican cock suckers but even a broke clock is right twice a day

I think you're talking about nutz. I never had a problem with him - to me he's always come across a level headed guy, although we may not always agree on everything.

It is because I respond in-kind. You are a cool dude, Rocko....

Sealysuckacock is nothing but a racist ******.

Thanks bro, I think you're cool as well. I really don't know the other poster. I think on the subject of racism people have the tendency of letting their emotions get the best of them and sometimes they say things they may not mean. A few times I've allowed that to happen to myself and I regreted it later. Hopefully I've grown from that.

Yes, he is very emotional. So much that he is part she.

 

[sealybobo]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

I don't deny this. In fact I've been telling black people its getting harder and harder for us liberals to defend them. They called me a racist ******. It was nuts. Do you know him? I told them poor people need to stop having kids they can't afford or raise properly. Hate to agree with you republican cock suckers but even a broke clock is right twice a day

I think you're talking about nutz. I never had a problem with him - to me he's always come across a level headed guy, although we may not always agree on everything.

It is because I respond in-kind. You are a cool dude, Rocko....

Sealysuckacock is nothing but a racist ******.

Thanks bro, I think you're cool as well. I really don't know the other poster. I think on the subject of racism people have the tendency of letting their emotions get the best of them and sometimes they say things they may not mean. A few times I've allowed that to happen to myself and I regreted it later. Hopefully I've grown from that.

Nuts said he hopes I die before I'm 50 of cancer. I just said why can't I call him the n word when he calls people faggots.

 

[sealybobo]

By now it should be self evident to anyone with a functioning brain-cell that black on white crime doesn't get nearly the attention white on black crime recieves. Why do liberals deny this?

I don't deny this. In fact I've been telling black people its getting harder and harder for us liberals to defend them. They called me a racist ******. It was nuts. Do you know him? I told them poor people need to stop having kids they can't afford or raise properly. Hate to agree with you republican cock suckers but even a broke clock is right twice a day

I think you're talking about nutz. I never had a problem with him - to me he's always come across a level headed guy, although we may not always agree on everything.

It is because I respond in-kind. You are a cool dude, Rocko....

Sealysuckacock is nothing but a racist ******.

Thanks bro, I think you're cool as well. I really don't know the other poster. I think on the subject of racism people have the tendency of letting their emotions get the best of them and sometimes they say things they may not mean. A few times I've allowed that to happen to myself and I regreted it later. Hopefully I've grown from that.

Yes, he is very emotional. So much that he is part she.

Your the one who got emotional you silly coon.