ozro
Diamond Member
What a crock of bullshit.
And off the OP goes to Iggyland for stupidity....
And off the OP goes to Iggyland for stupidity....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We should also recognize the connection between colonialism and fascism:How British colonialism killed 100 million Indians in 40 years
The extraordinary mortality rates in India between 1880 to 1920 were no accident.www.aljazeera.com
This is an al Jazeera article on how the British murdered over 100 million people in India, from 1880 to 1920.
And to me that is who NATO really are, the monsters who deliberately keep starting wars, like WWI, and massacring civilians, like we did with Shock and Awe.
{...
How British colonialism killed 100 million Indians in 40 years
Between 1880 to 1920, British colonial policies in India claimed more lives than all famines in the Soviet Union, Maoist China and North Korea combined.
Recent years have seen a resurgence in nostalgia for the British empire. High-profile books such as Niall Ferguson’s Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World, and Bruce Gilley’s The Last Imperialist, have claimed that British colonialism brought prosperity and development to India and other colonies. Two years ago, a YouGov poll found that 32 percent of people in Britain are actively proud of the nation’s colonial history.
- Dylan Sullivan
Adjunct Fellow in the School of Social Sciences, Macquarie University- Jason Hickel
This rosy picture of colonialism conflicts dramatically with the historical record. According to research by the economic historian Robert C Allen, extreme poverty in India increased under British rule, from 23 percent in 1810 to more than 50 percent in the mid-20th century. Real wages declined during the British colonial period, reaching a nadir in the 19th century, while famines became more frequent and more deadly. Far from benefitting the Indian people, colonialism was a human tragedy with few parallels in recorded history.
...}
We need to stop pretending that NATO and all colonial imperialists are the "good guy". We aren't.
excellent post.well said.How British colonialism killed 100 million Indians in 40 years
The extraordinary mortality rates in India between 1880 to 1920 were no accident.www.aljazeera.com
This is an al Jazeera article on how the British murdered over 100 million people in India, from 1880 to 1920.
And to me that is who NATO really are, the monsters who deliberately keep starting wars, like WWI, and massacring civilians, like we did with Shock and Awe.
{...
How British colonialism killed 100 million Indians in 40 years
Between 1880 to 1920, British colonial policies in India claimed more lives than all famines in the Soviet Union, Maoist China and North Korea combined.
Recent years have seen a resurgence in nostalgia for the British empire. High-profile books such as Niall Ferguson’s Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World, and Bruce Gilley’s The Last Imperialist, have claimed that British colonialism brought prosperity and development to India and other colonies. Two years ago, a YouGov poll found that 32 percent of people in Britain are actively proud of the nation’s colonial history.
- Dylan Sullivan
Adjunct Fellow in the School of Social Sciences, Macquarie University- Jason Hickel
This rosy picture of colonialism conflicts dramatically with the historical record. According to research by the economic historian Robert C Allen, extreme poverty in India increased under British rule, from 23 percent in 1810 to more than 50 percent in the mid-20th century. Real wages declined during the British colonial period, reaching a nadir in the 19th century, while famines became more frequent and more deadly. Far from benefitting the Indian people, colonialism was a human tragedy with few parallels in recorded history.
...}
We need to stop pretending that NATO and all colonial imperialists are the "good guy". We aren't.
this sounds like another totally bogus left wing hate mongering story
Cowardly, greedy jackals prefer to join a strong gang. These are all the reasons.It's about thugs like Putin sniveling about why all his neighbors want to join NATO for some reason his fans never want to explain.
Cowardly, greedy jackals prefer to join a strong gang. These are all the reasons.
They all criminals. Everywhere.Like your oligarch criminals swarming around Putin, Yes, you're right.
Still living twenty years in the past and spoon fed by the rotten MSM .Like your oligarch criminals swarming around Putin, Yes, you're right.
If the Brits killed so many Indians, why is India's population a hundred or more times what it was before the East India Company took control? I'll give you a hint, the Brits brought sanitation and "modern" (for the eighteen and nineteen hundreds) medicine to India cutting infant mortality and disease to a small fraction of what it was before. Unfortunately, the Indians kept having tons of kids resulting in overpopulation and famines.How British colonialism killed 100 million Indians in 40 years
The extraordinary mortality rates in India between 1880 to 1920 were no accident.www.aljazeera.com
This is an al Jazeera article on how the British murdered over 100 million people in India, from 1880 to 1920.
And to me that is who NATO really are, the monsters who deliberately keep starting wars, like WWI, and massacring civilians, like we did with Shock and Awe.
{...
How British colonialism killed 100 million Indians in 40 years
Between 1880 to 1920, British colonial policies in India claimed more lives than all famines in the Soviet Union, Maoist China and North Korea combined.
Recent years have seen a resurgence in nostalgia for the British empire. High-profile books such as Niall Ferguson’s Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World, and Bruce Gilley’s The Last Imperialist, have claimed that British colonialism brought prosperity and development to India and other colonies. Two years ago, a YouGov poll found that 32 percent of people in Britain are actively proud of the nation’s colonial history.
- Dylan Sullivan
Adjunct Fellow in the School of Social Sciences, Macquarie University- Jason Hickel
This rosy picture of colonialism conflicts dramatically with the historical record. According to research by the economic historian Robert C Allen, extreme poverty in India increased under British rule, from 23 percent in 1810 to more than 50 percent in the mid-20th century. Real wages declined during the British colonial period, reaching a nadir in the 19th century, while famines became more frequent and more deadly. Far from benefitting the Indian people, colonialism was a human tragedy with few parallels in recorded history.
...}
We need to stop pretending that NATO and all colonial imperialists are the "good guy". We aren't.
which country it represents, where its main office ?Jazeera
yes, badly overpopulated miserable shit land said the first Pushtu ruler of IndiaIndia had many devastating famines long before the British arrived.
The jews were being killed and expelled long before Hitler came along.India had many devastating famines long before the British arrived.