Why leftist Judeo-Christianity doesn't work for Rightists

[rupol2000]

Abrahamism was originally based on a bureaucratic principle: Moses receives directives from God, the people must fulfill them, and so on.

Unlike them, the Aryans never codified formal directives, but expressed in the poetic form of hymns the Principles on the basis of which one must act.

The Right Path implies freedom of action in the context of goals and the Path, therefore, in the Right Path, the main role is played by individual initiative and not by instructions for execution.

Therefore, Abrahamism is not suitable for the right.

 

[rupol2000]

By the way, this is the reason why the Right Way is the way of reason and idea, and the Left Path is the path of simple formal execution without awareness of the path.
Therefore, the right path is illuminated from above, and the left path is a blind path.
The right sees the gods directly, the left only reads about them and believes the preachers.

 

[rupol2000]

This is why the Left has always rejected idealism. They denied that there is an idea outside of matter, that a person can see not only with his eyes but also with his mind.

The word witch literally means "seeing". Whoever sees and leads on the right path.

 

[surada]

Abrahamism was originally based on a bureaucratic principle: Moses receives directives from God, the people must fulfill them, and so on.

Unlike them, the Aryans never codified formal directives, but expressed in the poetic form of hymns the Principles on the basis of which one must act.

The Right Path implies freedom of action in the context of goals and the Path, therefore, in the Right Path, the main role is played by individual initiative and not by instructions for execution.

Therefore, Abrahamism is not suitable for the right.

Evangelical fundamentalists and futurists are hard right.

 

[Moonglow]

Evangelical fundamentalists and futurists are hard right.

Especially these damn Christain nationalists.

 

[Moonglow]

I have yet to see any Christians that are pacifists or follow the laws of God.

 

[surada]

Especially these damn Christain nationalists.

Yeah. Trump claimed he's a nationalist. Look at the nationalists of the 20th century.

 

[rupol2000]

I have yet to see any Christians that are pacifists or follow the laws of God.

Because now there is no such strong church system as it was during the time of the Inquisition.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Abrahamism was originally based on a bureaucratic principle: Moses receives directives from God, the people must fulfill them, and so on.

Unlike them, the Aryans never codified formal directives, but expressed in the poetic form of hymns the Principles on the basis of which one must act.

The Right Path implies freedom of action in the context of goals and the Path, therefore, in the Right Path, the main role is played by individual initiative and not by instructions for execution.

Therefore, Abrahamism is not suitable for the right.

Republics Empower an Oligarchic Clique


That's what our elitist Constitution is, but I wouldn't blame that disaster on the Bible. In fact, Rightists want us to treat it like Fundamentalist treat the Bible; politicizing that is a sacrilege.