Why is the Left obsessed with forcing the Right to believe the Election wasn’t Stolen?

[Moonglow]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

I have left that since it was time to move on and the questions have been answered by those on high..Maybe you should move on also or get a pink pussy hat...

 

[busybee01]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

Because you're undermining the election process which is a cornerstone of our freedom.

How is demanding election integrity “undermining” the election process?

Once again you Marxist fags accuse us of what you are doing. You cheat in elections and subvert our Republic by refusing to allow audits, or to pass voter ID laws.

We had election integrity. You are the marxist who wanted to steal the election. You are the lying cheaters.

 

[toobfreak]

The election was stolen. Pretty sad that the left had to use 24/7 365 days a year for four years of anti-Trump propaganda, and still had to resort to cheating on election night to dump hundreds of thousands of votes in key districts to “win”.

You are the cheating lying piece of garbage. You cdannot face the truth.

LAY IT ON US, BUSTER. Tell us your "truth."

I've got 88 well-documented factual incidents of massive election fraud just waiting for you to prove them all wrong!

 

[Concerned American]

Because it's a lie.

And we are not a third world country.

We are not a third world country, but we will be in 2022 after China Joe and Kameltoe get done with us.

 

[Lastamender]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

I have left that since it was time to move on and the questions have been answered by those on high..Maybe you should move on also or get a pink pussy hat...

Maybe you should stay off the thread since no one is moving on with you. We will never accept that the election was free and fair.

 

[toobfreak]

Once again you Marxist fags accuse us of what you are doing. You cheat in elections and subvert our Republic by refusing to allow audits, or to pass voter ID laws.

We had election integrity.

PROVE IT! Back it up. If we had election integrity, then why all the effort to suppress the investigation?

We've always had "election integrity"---- ---- except THE FOUR YEARS DONALD WAS IN OFFICE.

When Trump was in, all it took was a few ads on Facebook to steal the fucking election from Hillary! Dipshit!

 

[theHawk]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

This fails as a strawman fallacy.

Care to quantify that statement?

 

[Lastamender]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

Because you're undermining the election process which is a cornerstone of our freedom.

How is demanding election integrity “undermining” the election process?

Once again you Marxist fags accuse us of what you are doing. You cheat in elections and subvert our Republic by refusing to allow audits, or to pass voter ID laws.

We had election integrity. You are the marxist who wanted to steal the election. You are the lying cheaters.

We had it until this illegitimate president was sworn in.

 

[dblack]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

I have left that since it was time to move on and the questions have been answered by those on high..Maybe you should move on also or get a pink pussy hat...

Maybe you should stay off the thread since no one is moving on with you. We will never accept that the election was free and fair.

And are you honest enough to admit it's solely because Trump said so? If he hadn't, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

 

[Concerned American]

Because consent of the governed is necessary for stable society. If half the nation refuses to accept the legitimacy of our government, we're kind a fucked.

Enjoy your sex life for the next four years. I don't think it is gonna be kinda--You're just gonna be fucked.

 

[BlindBoo]

Because the Rabid Right so willing to use violence to force their lie upon the rest of us. I'd rather convince you that you've been conned, than have to kill you or lock you up, because you want to overthrow the duly elected government of the people.

No one is talking about violence. We’re talking about the election.

The Rabid Right is. Your ex-president who encouraged 2nd Amendment solutions all the time, is the ring leader. He's conned ya'll and he wants ya'll to fight for him!

 

[toobfreak]

Good read, because it’s very true.

Independents also do not believe your garbage either. All you are doing is regurgitating the same okld tired arguments.

When did they get old? When did they get tired? When you ran out of excuses for not being able to back up your stupid claims that the election wasn't a TOTAL FUCKING RIP OFF FRAUD ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE?

 

[Leo123]

Maybe you should stay off the thread since no one is moving on with you. We will never accept that the election was free and fair.

Moonie likes to stick his ass in everyone's face, for him it ain't about discourse.

 

[Lastamender]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

I have left that since it was time to move on and the questions have been answered by those on high..Maybe you should move on also or get a pink pussy hat...

Maybe you should stay off the thread since no one is moving on with you. We will never accept that the election was free and fair.

And are you honest enough to admit it's solely because Trump said so? If he hadn't, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Trump was hardly the first one to say it. Phones were ringing off the hooks with citizens saying they witnessed the fraud. I have looked at the evidence and it is very convincing. Trump's policies are what mattered to me. But I have to admit he rose to the office in every important aspect.

Here is the Evidence

Crowdsourcing evidence for journalists.

hereistheevidence.com

 

[Leo123]

The Rabid Right is. Your ex-president who encouraged 2nd Amendment solutions all the time, is the ring leader. He's conned ya'll and he wants ya'll to fight for him!

What exactly is a 2nd amendment solution? Some kind of lefty-Marxist code talk?

 

[Lastamender]

Because the Rabid Right so willing to use violence to force their lie upon the rest of us. I'd rather convince you that you've been conned, than have to kill you or lock you up, because you want to overthrow the duly elected government of the people.

No one is talking about violence. We’re talking about the election.

The Rabid Right is. Your ex-president who encouraged 2nd Amendment solutions all the time, is the ring leader. He's conned ya'll and he wants ya'll to fight for him!

You are the "mark". You are projecting your gullibility on others.

 

[toobfreak]

No one is talking about violence.

The Rabid Right is.

Is that why Big Tech is trying to ban even discussing the election? Is that why Democrats are labeling millions of Americans terrorists and threats for asking the obvious questions? Is that why the Left have suggested putting people in concentration camps to "reeducate" them?

 

[Concerned American]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

This fails as a strawman fallacy.

Care to quantify that statement?

whenever he is losing the argument, he starts talking about fellating a strawman

 

[toobfreak]

Great, Seawitch. Now back up your allegations with proof. Documentation. Where's your evidence supporting that all of these things are LIES?

Pick a couple the lies you were banned for.

DEFLECTION. There are no lies. I never said a word about being banned, idiot. The only lie here is that there was no massive fraud. PRESENT YOUR DOCUMENTATION that the election claims are all lies!

WHY IS THAT SO HARD TO GET ANYONE TO SHOW US?????

 

[Cecilie1200]

Reality is nice.

Reality is nice. The election was stolen. Pretty sad that the left had to use 24/7 365 days a year for four years of anti-Trump propaganda, and still had to resort to cheating on election night to dump hundreds of thousands of votes in key districts to “win”.

You are the cheating lying piece of garbage. You cdannot face the truth.

If it was the truth, you wouldn't have to silence anyone who disagrees. You're probably neither bright enough nor honest enough to realize this, but your behavior is a hallmark of people who are lying, not of people who are telling the truth.