What might I have said that is not true?Probably because you repeated Racist memes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What might I have said that is not true?Probably because you repeated Racist memes.
What might I have said that is not true?
So true. But among the left, and as seen on this forum, the focus is on black racism and discussions of antisemitism are discouraged. That’s because it makes blacks look bad for blaming racism for failure when Jews experience more prejudice and succeed despite it."[W]e at the FBI see -- up close, day in and day out -- the actions that hatred drives. Jewish people continue to face repeated violence and very real threats, from all kind of actors, simply for being who they are. A full 63% of religious hate crimes are motivated by antisemitism -- targeting a group that makes up just 2.4% of our population." -- Christopher Wray, FBI Director, Nov. 2022
Because there are more blacks. Duh. But a Jew is much more likely to be victimized by a hate crime than a black.And still every year, more hate crimes are committed against blacks according to the FBI.
People who are opposed to racist policies are trying to eliminate having different admissions standards depending on what race a person is.That's why white women have benefitted most from the policy. And Asians are not being discriminated against.
In the case before the Supreme court Asians were 26 percent f the students admitted into Harvard, blacks, 15 percent.
“Using publicly released reports, we examine the preferences Harvard gives for recruited athletes, legacies, those on the dean’s interest list, and children of faculty and staff (ALDCs). Among white admits, over 43% are ALDC. Among admits who are African American, Asian American, and Hispanic, the share is less than 16% each. Our model of admissions shows that roughly three quarters of white ALDC admits would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs. Removing preferences for athletes and legacies would significantly alter the racial distribution of admitted students, with the share of white admits falling and all other groups rising or remaining unchanged.”
Daniella Silva, Study on Harvard finds 43 percent of white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/study-harvard-finds-43- percent-white-students-are-legacy-athletes-n1060361
Peter Arcidiacono, Josh Kinsler, Tyler Ransom, National Bureau Of Economic Research, Legacy And Athlete Preferences At Harvard, Working Paper 26316, Legacy and Athlete Preferences at Harvard
Study Questions Bias Against Asians in Admissions
If only standardized test scores were used to admit students to the most selective colleges, Asian enrollments would increase by just two percentage points, researchers say.
The debate over affirmative action has been framed in part (by opponents of affirmative action) as a matter of protecting the rights of Asian Americans. These students are outperforming other groups on the SATs and ACT and would earn many more spots at top colleges if admissions focused on academics, the argument goes. After all, the enrollment of Asian American students has become stagnant at many of the leading colleges and universities (although it is far more than their share of the U.S. population). And the admit rate for Asian American students is lower than for other groups at these colleges.
But what if bias doesn't explain those realities?
A report being released today by the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce finds no "strong evidence" of discrimination against Asian American applicants in admissions to the 91 most selective colleges.
- The share of Asian American students has been "consistent" with the share of Asian American applicants who are "highly qualified."
- While the Asian American admit rate is indeed lower than the rates of other groups at selective college, "they are also much more likely to apply to these colleges, regardless of their test scores."
- "Even if standardized test scores were the only factor considered in admissions, the Asian American share of enrollment at the most selective colleges would increase by no more than 2 percentage points."
Study questions bias against Asians in admissions
If only standardized test scores were used to admit students to the most selective colleges, Asian enrollments would increase by just two percentage points, researchers say.www.insidehighered.com
White racists are using Asians to try ending equal opportunity.
Is that a big no-no here? I think everyone knows that the average IQ of Asians (and Jews) is higher than blacks. That, combined with the emphasis in higher education in these two minorities, explains why they over-represented in college classes. Smart, education-focused kids tend to go to college.I think I'll pass on that one.
When I drew attention to racial differences in average IQ on a website I pay for, I was prevented from ever posting comments there.
How has The Bell Curve data been discredited? Do not say that a bunch of presumed "experts" in the field have discredited The Bell Curve by condemning it. Explain how they discredited it. Present evidence of intrinsic racial equality in average intelligence.well, if you were repeating the discredited "Bell Curve" data, that definitely wasn't true.
As one Japanese soldier would say to another when faced with an American amphibious invasion during World War II, "I will see you at Yasukuni."Is that a big no-no here? I think everyone knows that the average IQ of Asians (and Jews) is higher than blacks. That, combined with the emphasis in higher education in these two minorities, explains why they over-represented in college classes. Smart, education-focused kids tend to go to college.
How has The Bell Curve data been discredited? Do not say that a bunch of presumed "experts" in the field have discredited The Bell Curve by condemning it. Explain how they discredited it. Present evidence of intrinsic racial equality in average intelligence.
When discussing racial differences I am careful to speak in terms of tendencies and averages. Now the "or most" caveat alarms me somewhat, but I am willing to present supporting evidence, if I can do so without fear of banishment.
According to The Bell Curve an IQ test given to a seven year old gives a better prediction to the child's life time earning than the incomes of the parents. Like other assertions in The Bell Curve, this assertion is documented.Because it claims a genetic component while failing to take into account economic considerations.
But white trash losers hang on to it, thinking you are the smartest guy in the trailer park.
Oh, I doubt you'll last that long here, so might as well go out with a bang.
According to The Bell Curve an IQ test given to a seven year old gives a better prediction to the child's life time earning than the incomes of the parents. Like other assertions in The Bell Curve, this assertion is documented.
The Bell Curve is more obviously true now than when it was published in 1994. Gene alleles are being discovered for intelligence.The Bell Curve was junk the minute it was put out by racists.
The Bell Curve is more obviously true now than when it was published in 1994.
Calling someone a racist is name calling. Name calling is the lowest form of discourse. It does not advance the discussion the United States needs to be having. It is an effort to coerce an end to the discussion. In my comment #253 I post information about discoveries since 1994, when The Bell Curve was published, of gene alleles that influence intelligence.Only to racists...
Explain why Jews do better in school than the average, go on to graduate from college at higher rates, and achieve higher incomes and net worth.Only to racists...
And we’ve been seeing more and more of that in recent years. Any time a Democrat (sorry, but it comes from Democrats) doesn’t agree with what you’re saying, and has no way to argue the point, he slams the door shut with “racist!!”Calling someone a racist is name calling. Name calling is the lowest form of discourse. It does not advance the discussion the United States needs to be having. It is an effort to coerce an end to the discussion. In my comment #253 I post information about discoveries since 1994, when The Bell Curve was published, of gene alleles that influence intelligence.
I would replace "Democrat" in your comment to "anti racist." All Democrats are not anti racists. The New Deal was popular with Southern whites and white blue collar workers.And we’ve been seeing more and more of that in recent years. Any time a Democrat (sorry, but it comes from Democrats) doesn’t agree with what you’re saying, and has no way to argue the point, he slams the door shut with “racist!!”
Those of my persuasion can be silenced. We cannot be refuted. By suppressing heriditarians and race realists anti racists prevent a debate they cannot win in an atmosphere that respects facts and insights.Because it claims a genetic component while failing to take into account economic considerations.
But white trash losers hang on to it, thinking you are the smartest guy in the trailer park.
Oh, I doubt you'll last that long here, so might as well go out with a bang.
I doubt Hector is white trash. His writing style and well-cited research suggests he is an intelligent, educated man,Because it claims a genetic component while failing to take into account economic considerations.
But white trash losers hang on to it, thinking you are the smartest guy in the trailer park.
Oh, I doubt you'll last that long here, so might as well go out with a bang.