why has MSNBC 448 Obama impeachment mentions in July alone??

[bodecea]

I'm not interested in your idiotic blind accusations that you believe just because you want to. I do have a question on this though. What did the Democrats offer them since Republicans are the ones who shut "down the government?" I don't remember them offering Republicans dick. You can refresh my memory.

Offer?
For allowing the government to function?

What did TeaPublicans offer the American people for wasting $26 billion in a temper tantrum fed shutdown?

Deflection. You said the "Republicans" shut down the government. What compromise did the Democrats offer since you don't hold them accountable?

"Green Eggs and Ham" was the option for the Republicans during the shut down.

 

[kaz]

That is why Democrats are not allowing Republicans to lay low on impeachment before the election. They want them on the record....NOW.....while they are still accountable to the voters

LOL, demonstrating my last post. The Republicans aren't impeaching Obama. You do so enjoy the stick up your butt, don't you?

Yet. People are trying to find out if they are holding that card until after the mid-terms. I'm betting they are.

You're not "betting" they are, you are making a blind, unsubstantiated accusation and presenting it as if it's an argument.

You hate Republicans, you're obviously not qualified to speak for them. Most Republicans do not think there is any positive result that is going to come from impeachment. It's not going to happen. That someone who hates them makes the accusation while and trying to benefit from your accusation as if it is fact doesn't change that.

 

[bodecea]

Offer?
For allowing the government to function?

What did TeaPublicans offer the American people for wasting $26 billion in a temper tantrum fed shutdown?

Deflection. You said the "Republicans" shut down the government. What compromise did the Democrats offer since you don't hold them accountable?

Now you are deflecting

How does someone compromise with someone involved in extortion?
Give me what I want or I will shut down government

Sounds like they want to blame the victim of extortion for not giving in.

"Nice country you got here...hate to see anything happen to it...."

 

[bodecea]

LOL, demonstrating my last post. The Republicans aren't impeaching Obama. You do so enjoy the stick up your butt, don't you?

Yet. People are trying to find out if they are holding that card until after the mid-terms. I'm betting they are.

You're not "betting" they are, you are making a blind, unsubstantiated accusation and presenting it as if it's an argument.

I'm willing to bet that they will start articles of impeachment w/in 6 months after the mid-terms....Especially if they retain a majority in the House.

What would you like to bet me in this regard?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

why has MSNBC 448 Obama impeachment mentions in July alone??

Because republicans and conservatives have been calling for the president to be 'impeached'; starting with Sarah Palin on July 8th.

 

[Camp]

The Republicans ARE NOT talking about impeachment. The Dumbos are the ones saying they are.

Dimwit. Get with the program.

At least 15 Republican Congressional Representatives have called for, threatened or voiced support for impeachment. And persons normally viewed as Republican spokespersons are talking their heads off suggesting impeachment.

I realize as a liberal you can't process or follow simple discussions, so I'll dumb it down for you. He means no one with credibility to do it is talking impeachment. He didn't mean no one literally. I mean that was blatantly obvious, but since other liberals can't actually read with more than minimal comprehension either, I'll give you a pass on that one. Even though I can't possibly see how you did not get what he meant. Obama isn't going to be impeached. Not gonna happen no matter how much you want it to.

Tell me again how you're the intelligent party, lol.

You don't need to dumb it down for me. I comprehend and understand that the only people with credibility that means anything are elected members of congress who actually vote on whether to impeach a President or not. Let me dumb it down for you. Elected members of the House of Representatives vote to impeach a President or not impeach a President. If over a dozen of them talk about impeaching a President it means an impeachment vote is possible.

 

[kaz]

Offer?
For allowing the government to function?

What did TeaPublicans offer the American people for wasting $26 billion in a temper tantrum fed shutdown?

Deflection. You said the "Republicans" shut down the government. What compromise did the Democrats offer since you don't hold them accountable?

"Green Eggs and Ham" was the option for the Republicans during the shut down.

The Democrats offered a budget. Republicans said no. Since the shut down was the fault of the "Republicans" according to you, what compromise did the Democrats offer?

 

[kaz]

At least 15 Republican Congressional Representatives have called for, threatened or voiced support for impeachment. And persons normally viewed as Republican spokespersons are talking their heads off suggesting impeachment.

I realize as a liberal you can't process or follow simple discussions, so I'll dumb it down for you. He means no one with credibility to do it is talking impeachment. He didn't mean no one literally. I mean that was blatantly obvious, but since other liberals can't actually read with more than minimal comprehension either, I'll give you a pass on that one. Even though I can't possibly see how you did not get what he meant. Obama isn't going to be impeached. Not gonna happen no matter how much you want it to.

Tell me again how you're the intelligent party, lol.

You don't need to dumb it down for me. I comprehend and understand that the only people with credibility that means anything are elected members of congress who actually vote on whether to impeach a President or not. Let me dumb it down for you. Elected members of the House of Representatives vote to impeach a President or not impeach a President. If over a dozen of them talk about impeaching a President it means an impeachment vote is possible.

First, being dumb isn't dumbing it down. Second, 15 representatives can't impeach the president, so no, it isn't credible. And no, you don't understand.

 

[kaz]

Yet. People are trying to find out if they are holding that card until after the mid-terms. I'm betting they are.

You're not "betting" they are, you are making a blind, unsubstantiated accusation and presenting it as if it's an argument.

I'm willing to bet that they will start articles of impeachment w/in 6 months after the mid-terms....Especially if they retain a majority in the House.

What would you like to bet me in this regard?

I don't know what "start articles of impeachment" means, it's hand waiving. Someone writing something is meaningless. I am saying they will not impeach Obama.

 

[kaz]

why has MSNBC 448 Obama impeachment mentions in July alone??

Because republicans and conservatives have been calling for the president to be 'impeached'; starting with Sarah Palin on July 8th.

So now Sara Palin who isn't even an office holder speaks for the Republican party? LOL, I like to keep you morons talking, it's a hoot.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Well now, looks like impeachment is off the table. But the lawsuit is in. Guess what? Same amount of damage to the GOP.

True.

And both are idiotic and unwarranted.

Many on the right must believe the 'lawsuit' will offer some short-term political advantage, likely to appease the partisan extremists.

 

[kaz]

Well now, looks like impeachment is off the table. But the lawsuit is in. Guess what? Same amount of damage to the GOP.

True.

And both are idiotic and unwarranted.

Many on the right must believe the 'lawsuit' will offer some short-term political advantage, likely to appease the partisan extremists.

And if there's one thing you Marxists can't abide it's an "extremist." LOL.

 

[rightwinger]

Deflection. You said the "Republicans" shut down the government. What compromise did the Democrats offer since you don't hold them accountable?

Now you are deflecting

How does someone compromise with someone involved in extortion?
Give me what I want or I will shut down government

First, you don't know what deflection means. You're on the internet, you realize you could just open a tab and google it, no?

Second, so to you, when Democrats present a budget it's take it or leave it, and leaving it makes the Republicans responsible for shutting down the government and "extortion," and Democrats don't have to offer Republicans anything, Republicans just have to give them their way.

I knew that, I just wanted you to say it. Democrat budgets are to be passed as is, period. Got it.

It was a continuing resolution NOT a budget

A continuing resolution allows the government to continue operations at existing funding. Blocking a continuing resolution mandates a shutdown

Republicans used the impending shutdown in an attempt at extortion. Obama didn't bite

 

[bodecea]

Deflection. You said the "Republicans" shut down the government. What compromise did the Democrats offer since you don't hold them accountable?

"Green Eggs and Ham" was the option for the Republicans during the shut down.

The Democrats offered a budget. Republicans said no. Since the shut down was the fault of the "Republicans" according to you, what compromise did the Democrats offer?

Why did they need to when they were being blackmailed with an all or nothing? When did the Republicans talk of compromise?

You blame those being blackmailed? Those being extorted? Admit it.

 

[bodecea]

You're not "betting" they are, you are making a blind, unsubstantiated accusation and presenting it as if it's an argument.

I'm willing to bet that they will start articles of impeachment w/in 6 months after the mid-terms....Especially if they retain a majority in the House.

What would you like to bet me in this regard?

I don't know what "start articles of impeachment" means, it's hand waiving. Someone writing something is meaningless. I am saying they will not impeach Obama.

What would you like to bet me in this regard?

 

[rightwinger]

Yet. People are trying to find out if they are holding that card until after the mid-terms. I'm betting they are.

You're not "betting" they are, you are making a blind, unsubstantiated accusation and presenting it as if it's an argument.

I'm willing to bet that they will start articles of impeachment w/in 6 months after the mid-terms....Especially if they retain a majority in the House.

What would you like to bet me in this regard?

I think they know better

But they knew better than to shut down the government too

 

[bodecea]

Well now, looks like impeachment is off the table. But the lawsuit is in. Guess what? Same amount of damage to the GOP.

True.

And both are idiotic and unwarranted.

Many on the right must believe the 'lawsuit' will offer some short-term political advantage, likely to appease the partisan extremists.

And if there's one thing you Marxists can't abide it's an "extremist." LOL.

Do you even know what a "Marxist" is when you call people that?

 

[kaz]

Now you are deflecting

How does someone compromise with someone involved in extortion?
Give me what I want or I will shut down government

First, you don't know what deflection means. You're on the internet, you realize you could just open a tab and google it, no?

Second, so to you, when Democrats present a budget it's take it or leave it, and leaving it makes the Republicans responsible for shutting down the government and "extortion," and Democrats don't have to offer Republicans anything, Republicans just have to give them their way.

I knew that, I just wanted you to say it. Democrat budgets are to be passed as is, period. Got it.

It was a continuing resolution NOT a budget

A continuing resolution allows the government to continue operations at existing funding. Blocking a continuing resolution mandates a shutdown

Republicans used the impending shutdown in an attempt at extortion. Obama didn't bite

A distinction without a difference. So the Democrats offered a budget and didn't compromise. Then when they didn't get that, they offered a continuing resolution and didn't compromise on that either.

Why are you the holy ******* sainted emperors of the country that to not give you what you want is to shut down government when you offer zero in return? Where does it say in the Constitution that the Democrats get to set the budget and Republicans only get to persuade them?

The next post will not be you backing up any of your crap. The Democrats said they wanted their budget and offered nothing. Now, deflect away.

 

[Rozman]

This myth isn't going to fly. Give it up.

The Republicans finally woke up to the fact that crazy talk about impeachment isn't going to help them politically,

and since all they care about is political power, they're now desperately trying to blame impeachment talk on Democrats.

The problem is that Republicans are trying to distance themselves from impeachment talks and Democrats won't let them

So Republicans don't talk about impeachment.
Democrats keep saying that the Republiocans want it.

And the dumbass low information Democrat voters are left thinking the Republicans want to impeach Obama....

Priceless.

I can't recall anyone in the GOP saying they want impeachment.
It's the Democrats fanning the fire saying the GOP wants impeachment.

 

[kaz]

"Green Eggs and Ham" was the option for the Republicans during the shut down.

The Democrats offered a budget. Republicans said no. Since the shut down was the fault of the "Republicans" according to you, what compromise did the Democrats offer?

Why did they need to when they were being blackmailed with an all or nothing? When did the Republicans talk of compromise?

You blame those being blackmailed? Those being extorted? Admit it.

So when two sides both don't compromise, it's the fault of the Republicans and your farts don't stink. Your farts reek, honey. You didn't say "congress" you said the Republicans. Yet you freely admit the Democrats didn't compromise while you continue to blame the Republicans.

LOL.