why has MSNBC 448 Obama impeachment mentions in July alone??

[Howey]

...because the word's on the lips of teabaggers every five seconds?

 

[Camp]

S. Dakota GOP Resolution: Impeach Obama - Tea Party News

 

[kaz]

There was no budget offered.

The issue was a continuing resolution to allow government to continue operating until a budget was worked out

Republicans chose to keep the government from operating

Ah, was that another year Oboobma didn't offer a budget? Should have known.

So spending Constitutionally must start in the House. Republicans controlled the House. Democrats said no to the Republican spending plan and said theirs had to be passed, which was the year long spending levels they wanted.

We are still here with your view that either spending is exactly as Democrats say or any shutdown is the fault of the Republicans. Are you at any point going to have anything in your pants, or are you going to continue with the "no it isn't" strategy.

I'll make it as broad as I can for you. Since you blame Republicans, show me an example of behavior Democrats exemplifying what you wanted Republicans to do.

Sorry

But your post makes absolutely no sense. Maybe you can get someone else to explain it for you

I hear ya man. You're like, you know, literally



Democrats act like I want Republicans to act? WTF you talking about Homey? Why would I expect Democrats to act like I want Republicans to act? You need to explain what you mean by that.

Well, I guess you admitted your flaming hypocrisy. Sorry, you don't get credit for that, it's still flaming hypocrisy, but I am surprised you admitted it.

So, the next post isn't going to be your putting a penis in your pants and answering the question with an example of Democrats doing what you want what you advocate Republicans do, is it Nancy?

 

[kaz]

S. Dakota GOP Resolution: Impeach Obama - Tea Party News

Wow, the South Dakota Tea Party can impeach Obama? WTF. That is interesting. I'm afraid I'm going to have to ask for a link though to that particular Constitutional power since I am not familiar with that.

 

[kaz]

...because the word's on the lips of teabaggers every five seconds?

LOL, you people are stupid. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. The tea party can't impeach Obama. The question for the non stupid among you is who that matters advocates an impeachment?

I would impeach the President, his cabinet, the entire Senate and House if it were up to me and put them on trial. Anyone who has ever voted for an earmark, which is simple armed robbery I would convict. Which means I would be surprised if anyone there now remains. Since I can't do that, what difference does it make? None.

However, the question is regarding actual impeachment. Listing people who are not capable of impeaching Obama doesn't address the question, and it still doesn't no matter how stupid you are.

 

[rightwinger]

Ah, was that another year Oboobma didn't offer a budget? Should have known.

So spending Constitutionally must start in the House. Republicans controlled the House. Democrats said no to the Republican spending plan and said theirs had to be passed, which was the year long spending levels they wanted.

We are still here with your view that either spending is exactly as Democrats say or any shutdown is the fault of the Republicans. Are you at any point going to have anything in your pants, or are you going to continue with the "no it isn't" strategy.

I'll make it as broad as I can for you. Since you blame Republicans, show me an example of behavior Democrats exemplifying what you wanted Republicans to do.

Sorry

But your post makes absolutely no sense. Maybe you can get someone else to explain it for you

I hear ya man. You're like, you know, literally



Democrats act like I want Republicans to act? WTF you talking about Homey? Why would I expect Democrats to act like I want Republicans to act? You need to explain what you mean by that.

Well, I guess you admitted your flaming hypocrisy. Sorry, you don't get credit for that, it's still flaming hypocrisy, but I am surprised you admitted it.

So, the next post isn't going to be your putting a penis in your pants and answering the question with an example of Democrats doing what you want what you advocate Republicans do, is it Nancy?

Sorry

Even on your second try, you are making absolutely no sense

 

[kaz]

um... because they are the left-leaning news/editorial outlet and mentioning the tea brains talking about impeachment (which is groundless) raises money for the dems...


I answered.

What do I win?

You are certainly correct that happens and it's what the Democrats are motivated by.

I would just add that anyone who values the Constitution would also believe he should be impeached and removed from office. And anyone who believes that isn't going to happen and we shouldn't tilt at windmills at the cost of the country believes we should not actually do it. There are more of us than you realize.

 

[kaz]

Sorry

But your post makes absolutely no sense. Maybe you can get someone else to explain it for you

I hear ya man. You're like, you know, literally



Democrats act like I want Republicans to act? WTF you talking about Homey? Why would I expect Democrats to act like I want Republicans to act? You need to explain what you mean by that.

Well, I guess you admitted your flaming hypocrisy. Sorry, you don't get credit for that, it's still flaming hypocrisy, but I am surprised you admitted it.

So, the next post isn't going to be your putting a penis in your pants and answering the question with an example of Democrats doing what you want what you advocate Republicans do, is it Nancy?

Sorry

Even on your second try, you are making absolutely no sense

This is hysterical. You are da man.

So seriously, you don't understand when I ask you to show examples of your Democrats behaving how you advocate the Republicans should behave? You don't even understand the question?

So how did you make it to the eighth grade before you dropped out? Social promotion?

 

[rightwinger]

I hear ya man. You're like, you know, literally



Democrats act like I want Republicans to act? WTF you talking about Homey? Why would I expect Democrats to act like I want Republicans to act? You need to explain what you mean by that.

Well, I guess you admitted your flaming hypocrisy. Sorry, you don't get credit for that, it's still flaming hypocrisy, but I am surprised you admitted it.

So, the next post isn't going to be your putting a penis in your pants and answering the question with an example of Democrats doing what you want what you advocate Republicans do, is it Nancy?

Sorry

Even on your second try, you are making absolutely no sense

This is hysterical. You are da man.

So seriously, you don't understand when I ask you to show examples of your Democrats behaving how you advocate the Republicans should behave? You don't even understand the question?

So how did you make it to the eighth grade before you dropped out? Social promotion?

Seriously, you are making no sense

We were talking about the continuing resolution and Republicans using an impending Government shutdown for extortion

Your question makes zero sense

 

[MarcATL]

Republicans did the same thing with Clinton. They waited until six weeks after the midterm elections...THEN they filed impeachment charges

Democrats are being proactive this time

I see, I didn't realize you have proof. And there have been two midterm elections since with a sitting Democrat President, is that just further proof they will do it this time?

Obama should be impeached, but so should most of the rest of them in both parties. They aren't going to because there is no point. They don't really care how m uch you want them to.

You don't realize that one third of the Republican Party is batshit crazy. They insisted on shutting down the government (waited for a non-election year of course) and they will not be satisfied until Obama faces impeachment charges. This is the first midterm election since Republicans won the house in 2010.

Can the sane Republicans tell them to sit down and shut up? They haven't so far

So true


Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

[Interpol]

All the Republicans have done is talk about impeachment or try to repeal Obamacare this year. They got everything they wanted in that border bill but still couldn't pass it, the morons that they are, and some dumb bell here has started a thread attacking a news organization for bringing these things up.

Pretty stupid.

Impeach the guy or stfu already.

 

[MarcATL]

This myth isn't going to fly. Give it up.

The Republicans finally woke up to the fact that crazy talk about impeachment isn't going to help them politically,

and since all they care about is political power, they're now desperately trying to blame impeachment talk on Democrats.

The problem is that Republicans are trying to distance themselves from impeachment talks and Democrats won't let them

The Speaker of the House stated that there are no plans to impeach. The Democrats need to keep saying the opposite because it's a useful fundraising tactic.

Why can't he just say that impeachment is off the table like Pelosi did?



Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

[MarcATL]

The GOP has been talking about impeachment since Obama first got into office. They've been saying he wasn't born here.

Conservatives, at various times, have called for Obama to be killed either by an act of god or by an assassin's bullet.

Did you think this deplorable conduct would be ignored?

Thank you!



Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

[TooTall]

The problem is that Republicans are trying to distance themselves from impeachment talks and Democrats won't let them

The Speaker of the House stated that there are no plans to impeach. The Democrats need to keep saying the opposite because it's a useful fundraising tactic.

Why can't he just say that impeachment is off the table like Pelosi did?



Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Boehner takes his oath of office seriously. Pelosi, not so much.

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Unlike Obama, Boehner doesn't decide what parts of the Constitution he follows and what parts he ignores. If Obama commits any of the crimes mentioned in Article II, Section 4, Boehner and every single Senator and Representative have sworn to support the Constitution.

Article II, Section 4,establishes, "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

This applies to Obama for the remainder of his term as well as to all future Presidents unless the Constitution is amended.

 

[skookerasbil]

who cares?

How many people watch that network?

179? Maybe?

 

[TooTall]

When did he say that. Pelosi challenged him to take impeachment off the table the way she did regarding Bush when she was speaker. She made the challenge yesterday. Is there something current in the news or is he still refusing to take it off the table?

Pelosi is certifiable at best. Asking a Speaker of the House to ignore the Constitution is batshit crazy. Just because she does is not justification for others to do it.

"The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

If Obama is found to have committed any of the crimes stated in the Constitution, he should be impeached.

So you were mistaken about your claim that the speaker said impeachment was off the table. That was your comment. A little tidbit of misinformation. What is called a "seed" LIE.

You are the one that is mistaken. Boehner didn't say impeachment is off the table. This is what he said:

“We have no plans to impeach the president. We have no future plans,”

If Obama commits any of the crimes stated in the Constitution in the future, developing a plan would be the sworn duty of the Congress. Since Boehner cannot see into the future, he has not developed a plan on something that may or may not happen.

Just to bring you up to date, you attributed the Pelosi statement to Boehner. Here is where the ‘off the table’ remark came from. She stated:

This is about the road to impeachment. And if it is not, the Speaker can say one simple sentence: Impeachment is off the table.

To any but the simple minded, that clearly means she wants him to say that because she may have violated her oath of office when she made that statement about not impeaching Bush.

 

[rightwinger]

The Speaker of the House stated that there are no plans to impeach. The Democrats need to keep saying the opposite because it's a useful fundraising tactic.

Why can't he just say that impeachment is off the table like Pelosi did?



Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Boehner takes his oath of office seriously. Pelosi, not so much.

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

.

Takes his oath seriously? Are you kidding?

The Speaker of the Do Nothing Congress?

Shutting down your own government is is doing your job well?

 

[Wildman]

The scoreboard so far in July:
Fox News has 95 mentions of impeachment, and MSNBC 448.
That works out to about 2.7 mentions per hour of original programming on MSNBC, or once every 22 minutes.
(This data is as of late Tuesday afternoon.)
Democrats Are Way More Obsessed With Impeachment Than Republicans | FiveThirtyEight
WHY????

WHY ? because it is totally libercRAT driven, Conservacans have tried their best to dispel this libercRAT LIE !

 

[Wildman]

So...

...how many of USMB's impeachment hounds are now under the bus thanks to the efforts of USMB's 'we never supported impeachment' conservatives?

I guess an effort to dig up the names of those poor souls (i.e. USMB'ers who have in the past been all for impeachment) should be dredged up,

if for no other reason than to put some personality into all those people you born again anti-impeachment cons are now calling imbeciles.

personally, i am ALL for impeachment.., only IF it benefits ALL Americans. wouldn't you ?

now you can abandon your search for who is in favor of impeachment.

 

[Wildman]

Most Republicans in the Congress know better than to impeach Obama. If they wanted to, they could easily impeach him on any given day since they took the majority in the House.
They also know that conviction requires 67 votes in the Senate and that is not going to happen, even if they get a majority in the Senate this year.

The crazy talk is all on MSNBC. Watch Al Sharpton any night and he will say impeachment several dozen times.

They knew they didn't have 67 votes against Clinton. That didn't stop them then.

They thought that Democrats in the Senate were honorable men, but they were wrong. Clinton lost to Paula Jones, lost his law license and was fined for lying under oath. He is truly one of the best confidence men on the planet.

anyone who thinks any Demoscum anywhere are honorable must be drinking the koolaid, especially the grape flavored.