Why don't you want to tax the rich?

No one I have ever known who presented a serious plan for a flat tax has wanted to tax all income the same.
I'll try to write up something to explain it to you. You might not be the same as other conservatives I've discussed this with. I usually feel like I'm casting pearls before swine.
Just go look up the problems with a flat tax. You can read.

Let's see, it ends the complexity of our tax system.
It treats everyone the same.

Yeah, the problems with a flat tax sound very serious.
 
All I see here is your inability to provide a meaningful definition of "regressive tax" that correctly applies to a flat tax.
Which is fair, given there is none.
Your claim that a flat tax is a regressive tax is false.
No, it's not false. A flat tax is an example of a regressive tax. That you have never studied this topic isn't my fault.
 
No, it's not false. A flat tax is an example of a regressive tax. That you have never studied this topic isn't my fault.
Have you considered a real estate tax on property owners? That would get spread out to everyone eventually (eveybody's got to live somewhere).

The problem I see is most of you want to use taxes as a indirect way to control society.
 
Says he who believes a flat tax is a regressive tax, but cannot provide a meaningful definition of "regressive tax" that correctly applies to a flat tax.
I don't just believe it's regressive, I know it.
 
. A flat tax is an example of a regressive tax.
You cannot provide a meaningful definition of "regressive tax" that correctly applies to a flat tax.
Thus, your claim is false.
That you have never studied this topic isn't my fault.
Don't try to blame me for your inability to stand and deliver.
 
If only we could be more like Russia. . .
The competition between Russia and the U.S. goes far beyond guns and bombs and territory. It's about actual societal culture. There are things about us which is superior to them. There are things about them which are superior to us. Neither side wants their people to know this. Basically they teach as many impressionable dumbasses as possible that the other side is more far more backward and corrupt than they are. This is one area the U.S. truly excels. The real battle is over the happiness of people, not land or military might. Back in the late 90's/early 2000's I worked with a few Russians in NY who said that money was the only thing that brought them to the U.S., but other than that they would prefer to live in Russia, hands down. It goes beyond money. There have been many cases of members of American minorites leaving the U.S. for Russia. That's because they are treated more as equals there, or at least that was true during the height of the battle for civil rights. And look up which country put a woman in space first and allowed women to serve proudly in the military.

Both Russia and the U.S. have dabbled in things that have brought those countries to despair and the brink of collapse. Our country is nearly there too it just took us longer. And maybe that's NOT a good thing.
 
Have you considered a real estate tax on property owners? That would get spread out to everyone eventually (eveybody's got to live somewhere).

The problem I see is most of you want to use taxes as a indirect way to control society.
Yes, I considered that. But property taxes are regressive.
I want to use taxes as a way to fund the government.
However, Adam Smith didn't have a problem with controlling society with taxes.
 
The only solution is for governments to own the means of production, eh comrade?
There it is again. Anyone who criticizes the status quo is a commie. Why do you support a system that goes against your self interest as a poor beggar?

Can’t fix stupid.
 
If you are opposed, why?

Why do you oppose aggressive taxation of people making more than $250,000+ a year or $400,000+ a year annually?
Because it is their money, they earned it, keep your hands to yourself, the democrat party is the party of covetousness. You love to spend other peoples money
 
15th post
Hasn’t been an amendment in 30 years and that was trivial
Amendments take bipartisan agreement which Congress is no longer capable of
I’m not sure your point.

Are you saying we should change it to make it easier to amended the constitution? Why?
 
Yes, I considered that. But property taxes are regressive.
How? Rich people own a lot more property than poor. By "regressive", do you merely mean that government can't redistribute wealth as you'd like?
 
There it is again. Anyone who criticizes the status quo is a commie. Why do you support a system that goes against your self interest as a poor beggar?

Can’t fix stupid.

Why do you support a system that goes against your self interest as a poor beggar?

What system that I support goes against my self-interest?

I'm not poor or a beggar.

Can’t fix stupid.

I'm mocking you, not fixing you.
 
You cannot provide a meaningful definition of "regressive tax" that correctly applies to a flat tax.
Thus, your claim is false.

Don't try to blame me for your inability to stand and deliver.
I think I already explained it. But you keep saying I didn't.
A flat tax is regressive because it's a bigger burden on the poor. That's because they spend their money on necessities.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom