Why don't you want to tax the rich?

[Soupnazi630]

You guys are so funny. I love that you want to tax the poor and working classes more than they are today. It’s beautiful.

A flat tax would be LESS

There is no You guys moron

 

[gipper]

I get it. It just means the lack of a coercive state government. It's viable, in the right society. But just getting rid of government, all at once, right now, in the US - would be a disaster. And that's what everyone imagines when you talk about anarchy.



But the king protects us serfs from the dragons!

Thanks. I recognize suddenly eliminating all government after thousands of years of this shit, would be difficult.

 

[Oddball]

Heavy. Dumb it down to a five year old level. Not getting your premise.

I just did...You must be dumber than a 5-year old.

 

[struth]

So the choices in your small mind, are all the wealth is either with the super rich or with government. LMFAO.

THINK BETTER!

No, you think all the wealth is what the rich now??? Haha.

No

The choice is not allowing the govt to control how much someone can make v allowing the govt to do that

 

[dblack]

Heavy. Dumb it down to a five year old level. Not getting your premise.

Anarchy would NOT work for five-year-olds. Mostly, you'd need a society of adults who have internalized the rejection of coercion as a means to an end.

 

[Woodznutz]

If you are opposed, why?

Why do you oppose aggressive taxation of people making more than $250,000+ a year or $400,000+ a year annually?

How do you know these people are "rich"?

 

[citygator]

No I am not kidding, the wealth gap grew, tax revenue decreased, and nobody actually paid the rate

Um the top tax bracket for 2025 is 37 percent Federal income tax rates and brackets | Internal Revenue Service

You seem pretty clueless

EFFECTIVE tax rates, not marginal. Came directly from YOUR link. If you don’t like your links, don’t post them.

I know it grew worse by cutting top tier taxes.

 

[gipper]

No, you think all the wealth is what the rich now??? Haha.

No

The choice is not allowing the govt to control how much someone can make v allowing the govt to do that

Lol.

Thinking the status quo is acceptable, merely proves how uninformed you are.

 

[rightwinger]

Lol. You can’t be serious, yet somehow I know you are. Lol.

Do you need government to tell you what to do?

Government is force. History tells us government is injustice, suffering, and murder. Why continue it?

Time for a change.

What made Homo Sapiens succeed while Neanderthals didn’t.
Establishment of Societies and government to regulate that society.

Neanderthals used a clan structure of small groups that were nomadic
Homo Saipiens formed large communities that allowed members to assume certain roles, plant crops, build lasting homes, take care of the young and sick

Those communities prospered and relied on government to function

 

[citygator]

A flat tax would be LESS

There is no You guys moron

That isn’t mathmstically possible. Go ahead and show us how a flat tax is less for poor and working class but still funds the government.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That isn’t mathmstically possible. Go ahead and show us how a flat tax is less for poor and working class but still funds the government.

Yes it is.

Five percent or even tenn percent of income is less than the third of income that everyone pays now

Five percent of income from every american is all the government needs that is mathematical FACT

 

[leftwinger]

Federal tax receipts as a percentage of GDP have averaged 17.9% from 1946 to 2007, with a range from 14.4% to 20.9%, leading to the empirical observation known as Hauser's Law, which suggests that U.S. federal tax revenues have remained near 19.5% of GDP regardless of changes in marginal tax rates.

 

[rightwinger]

A flat tax would be LESS

There is no You guys moron

There is no flat tax structure that results in working Americans paying less and the wealthy paying more

It shifts tax burden to the middle class

 

[Woodznutz]

Darkwind No. But there is a lot of social frustration out there. A lot of people feel the rich are getting richer at the expense of the poor.

The poor make the rich wealthy. The government prints money to help the poor and the rich wind up with that money. The poor also borrow from the rich then pay them interest which makes them even richer. The poor also buy the stuff that the rich sell, which doesn't help. Many if not most of the poor are poor managers of both money and of their own lives.

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is no flat tax structure that results in working Americans paying less and the wealthy paying more

It shifts tax burden to the middle class

There absolutely is

No one needs the wealthy to pay mmore we need everyone paying less

 

[leftwinger]

But stupid board OXYEN can get different results? Like crazy Franco says "that cant be right, it doesn't make any sense?" I hate to spoil RW & Bulldog fantasy, but the top income tax rate never matters much. Prove it wrong.

 

[gipper]

What made Homo Sapiens succeed while Neanderthals didn’t.
Establishment of Societies and government to regulate that society.

Neanderthals used a clan structure of small groups that were nomadic
Homo Saipiens formed large communities that allowed members to assume certain roles, plant crops, build lasting homes, take care of the young and sick

Those communities relied on government to function

Lol. The D Party love of big government brainwashing you’ve endured still has control of your brain.

 

[OODA_Loop]

I just did...You must be dumber than a 5-year old.

Under your anarchy plan. Can you drive on any side of the road?

 

[OODA_Loop]

Anarchy would NOT work for five-year-olds. Mostly, you'd need a society of adults who have internalized the rejection of coercion as a means to an end.

In your anarchist utopia are there private property rights?

 

[gipper]

Under your anarchy plan. Can you drive on any side of the road?

See? Dumb.

Do you need government to tell you what side of the road to drive on?

I bet you require government to tell you when to take a shit.