rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 308,382
- 263,421
- 3,615
YesCircumcisions prevent AIDS?
Do I need to explain biology to you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
YesCircumcisions prevent AIDS?
From 1944 to 1963 the tax rate was 90+%. All indicators including GDP and standard of living and more for everybody grew at more than twice the rate it does now. Today the rich get richer at an astounding rate higher than the non-rich.
Nope. I’m an anarchist. No government is best. Thousands of years of history prove me right.But you can install your form of government and governance and finally get it right. No more status quo!
Today Rightwinger was a helpful poster.Yes
Do I need to explain biology to you?
Sweet......strongest survive. For example .... No rules at all? Driving...? Free reign as you please......Nope. I’m an anarchist. No government is best. Thousands of years of history prove me right.
I’ve yet to find anyone here who understands anarchy. You’re no exception.Sweet......strongest survive. For example .... No rules at all? Driving...? Free rein as you please......
8 billion humans on earthNope. I’m an anarchist. No government is best. Thousands of years of history prove me right.
This is your chance to educate. Help us understand how anarchy provides for an orderly society.I’ve yet to find anyone here who understands anarchy. You’re no exception.
Lol. You can’t be serious, yet somehow I know you are. Lol.8 billion humans on earth
We can’t survive as a civilization in a look out for number one world.
Government is what makes civilization possible
Africa is not our problem unless they are from SomaliaTypical RW logic
I found $10 M in expenditures I don’t understand so I will use that as a reason to claim a $4 trillion budget is a waste of money.
Why would we spend $10 M for circumcisions in Mozambique?
Because AIDS is ravaging Africa and we can’t afford to spend tens of thousands on treatments that US citizens get. So low cost measures like education, condoms and circumcisions are supported
Well not KarensSure. Millions of Karens are lining up to clean houses for $30 per hour or more. They are everywhere. Not.
It is theftNo
It is called contributing to a society
Order occurs naturally...It's disorder that needs aggression and manipulation.This is your chance to educate. Help us understand how anarchy provides for an orderly society.
Faiir is subjective and a flat tax would ABSOLUTELY workEveryone paying the same would be most person's definition of fair.
Perfectly fair. However at some point the tax has to be enough to fund the government. A flat tax will not do it.
I get it. It just means the lack of a coercive state government. It's viable, in the right society. But just getting rid of government, all at once, right now, in the US - would be a disaster. And that's what everyone imagines when you talk about anarchy.I’ve yet to find anyone here who understands anarchy.
The elite who greatly benefit from government at our expense, love those who support government.
I’m not your mommy. Would you believe me anyway? You’ll just give the usual statist lovers response of why I don’t move to Somalia.This is your chance to educate. Help us understand how anarchy provides for an orderly society.
Rightwinger has been educating giving penis and gay sex teachings this morning.
You guys are so funny. I love that you want to tax the poor and working classes more than they are today. It’s beautiful.Faiir is subjective and a flat tax would ABSOLUTELY work
Heavy. Dumb it down to a five year old level. Not getting your premise.Order occurs naturally...It's disorder that needs aggression and manipulation.
"Anarchy", properly defined, is no more dangerous to an "orderly society" than a garage sale.
No I am not kidding, the wealth gap grew, tax revenue decreased, and nobody actually paid the rateAre you kidding? Did you read what you posted? Your claim is 42% isnt “much higher” than 36% effective rates for the rich? And that was back in 2014 which is the data you posted. It’s now about 33% and the Dems wanted to take it back to 36%, and it was 42% back in the 50s. I’d be paying a lot more at 1950’s rates, about 27% more in taxes. That’s about $100k to me.