Why don’t republicans seem to understand the consequences of tax cuts?

[The5thHorseman]

This is my idea.

Todd,

No more running.

Answer the question.

 

[Nostra]

Read it again, cretin.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Todd,

No more running.

Answer the question.

You can vote for me.

 

[struth]

Wrong! Covid, Trump, and the Trump covid hoax started the decline.

what covid hoax?

 

[struth]

But you can't find a serious source that agrees with you...

hahah there are plenty of posters that agree with me

 

[bripat9643]

Revenue increases...but debt increases more

Tax cuts never pay for themselves

Wrong. I will concede that they don't always pay for themselves, but often they do. Trump's tax cut paid for itself because it made it worthwhile for American corporations with overseas operations to bring their profits back to America. This meant trillions of dollars in foreign investment could now be taxed.

 

[bripat9643]

List the people insisting it is...compare it to the list of those who say it isn't...

Acknowledge that you're a rube.

The U.S. government defined it Take it up with them.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Wrong. I will concede that they don't always pay for themselves, but often they do. Trump's tax cut paid for itself because it made it worthwhile for American corporations with overseas operations to bring their capital back from America. This meant trillions of dollars in foreign investment could now be taxed.

but often they do.

Not since JFK

Trump's tax cut paid for itself because it made it worthwhile for American corporations with overseas operations to bring their capital back from America

Not even close.

 

[Lesh]

Wrong. I will concede that they don't always pay for themselves, but often they do. Trump's tax cut paid for itself because it made it worthwhile for American corporations with overseas operations to bring their capital back from America. This meant trillions of dollars in foreign investment could now be taxed.

Save us your fantasies...unless you can prove them

 

[The5thHorseman]

The U.S. government defined it Take it up with them.

No, it didn't, bri.

You made that up.

Stop lying, bri.

 

[bripat9643]

Save us your fantasies...unless you can prove them

Name one theory in economics that can be proven with empirical data.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Save us your fantasies...unless you can prove them

Bri called Dr. Bradford DeLong, professor of economics at Berkeley, a "nobody".

The he cited a nobody, scribbling for the Washington Examiner, who quoted 2 nobodies insisting the US is in a recession.

Bri is a 19 ply moran.

 

[bripat9643]

No, it didn't, bri.

You made that up.

Stop lying, bri.

Wrong, shit for brains.

​

Recession: What Is It and What Causes It.​

​

A recession is a significant, widespread, and prolonged downturn in economic activity. A common rule of thumb is that two consecutive quarters of negative gross domestic product (GDP) growth mean recession, although more complex formulas are also used.​

 

[The5thHorseman]

Name one theory in economics that can be proven with empirical data.

Bri,

The question was to you.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Wrong, shit for brains.

Show me...

Use citations, bri....You're a chronic liar.

 

[bripat9643]

Bri,

The question was to you.

You have my answer.

 

[The5thHorseman]

You have my answer.

No I don't, coward.

 

[bripat9643]

The Mostly Forgotten Tax Increases of 1982-1993

Something had to make up for the financial hole created by Reagan's famous cuts.

www.bloomberg.com

What part of "immediately" didn't you understand?

 

[The5thHorseman]

What part of "immediately" didn't you understand?

What part of "immediately doubling the deficit and shortly thereafter quadrupling the debt" are you struggling, Bri?

The math?

 

[Lesh]

Jesus. Two quarters of negative GDP growth is ONE indicator of recession.

And GDP jumped right back up genius.

If that was a recession (it wasn’t) , it was the shortest and shallowest on record