Devils_Advocate
Diamond Member
PM Aye, Coyote or Kat to see if it break the rulesā¦
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do the moderators ever approve it?What IS "the point"? I forgot or it's already answered. NO - you can NOT sling pedophile/groomer at a member WITHOUT WORKING up a case for it and running by moderation.
My answer was deleted. Your question remains.I'll never do near the damage that Jeffrey Epstein and others have done... Right amigo???
I realize you are too caught up in your authoritarian rage so you can impress Coyote, but what I actually SAID was that he was using language pedophiles use when he referred to the sexual awakening of young children.What IS "the point"? I forgot or it's already answered. NO - you can NOT sling pedophile/groomer at a member WITHOUT WORKING up a case for it and running it by moderation.
You accuse people without any proof. You are a disgrace.Still a perfect record.
All authoritarian shouting, but cannot actually address the point.
I genuinely think that the subject is over your head. You should stay quiet.Well, at least you are being up front about your position on the subject.
Just imagine- if you call people names for opposing the violent gang rape of children, who knows how you would react if they simply opposed sex with children without the extreme violence involved.
You are projecting.I genuinely think that the subject is over your head. You should stay quiet.
Or do you consider all muslims to be guilty ?
Here you are making my point for me. You throw accusations around without any proof and are unable to back up your crap.You are projecting.
Since you support the gang rape of children by Pakistanis because they are Muslim, you assume the only reason people oppose the gang rape of children is for the same reason.
Interlude
Aren't you forgetting that there are many people in this thread who have seen your body of work?Here you are making my point for me. You throw accusations around without any proof and are unable to back up your crap.
Stuff like this should get you banned.
Stuff like this should get you banned.
Do the moderators ever approve it?
You know it's insane, right?
Yep. Weaponize without thought. Do you understand why the rest of us consider your ilk...Ridikolous?
That opens the door to interpretation and Coyote just reinterpreted itTHe neo-nazis, racists, pedos, Putin 'bros and groomers are HERE so that USMB members can DESTROY their flimsy narratives. Why would we ALLOW them here, if we weren't expecting the membership to DESTROY their nasty arguments, BY THE RULES, and then just walk away?? But in general, too much of the membership is "low effort" at discussion and looking for the EASY WAY -- which is simple brawling and name-calling.
I've spent pages with folks that MIGHT deserve to be called neo-nazis,Marxists, Putin 'bros or groomers, and you take apart their assertions and leave them speechless and WALK-AWAY.. No name-calling required.
Now not being stupid -- WE KNOW -- they'll be in another thread tomorrow repeating their litany of faulty stuff. That's why this only works if THE MEMBERSHIP puts in the effort to best them in discussion.
THAT would be more like the "free speech" ideals this board supports. Instead of revolting because you can't just toss the flamy hand grenade and pat yourself on the back.
Yet you just punished me for pointing out quite correctly that a phrase is used by pedophiles.THe neo-nazis, racists, pedos, Putin 'bros and groomers are HERE so that USMB members can DESTROY their flimsy narratives. Why would we ALLOW them here, if we weren't expecting the membership to DESTROY their nasty arguments, BY THE RULES, and then just walk away?? But in general, too much of the membership is "low effort" at discussion and looking for the EASY WAY -- which is simple brawling and name-calling.
I've spent pages with folks that MIGHT deserve to be called neo-nazis,Marxists, Putin 'bros or groomers, and you take apart their assertions and leave them speechless and WALK-AWAY.. No name-calling required.
Now not being stupid -- WE KNOW -- they'll be in another thread tomorrow repeating their litany of faulty stuff. That's why this only works if THE MEMBERSHIP puts in the effort to best them in discussion.
THAT would be more like the "free speech" ideals this board supports. Instead of revolting because you can't just toss the flamy hand grenade and pat yourself on the back.
Yet you just punished me for pointing out quite correctly that a phrase is used by pedophiles.
It's funny how your grandiose claims never seem to match the reality of a situation.
Please provide links to 3 or 4 examples. Thanks.I am curious as to why this forum is so gung-ho about supporting those who talk openly about the "sexual awakening" of young children, especially when those doing so brag about being in a position of authority over children?
Do you people have NO decency?
Yet you just punished me for pointing out quite correctly that a phrase is used by pedophiles.
It's funny how your grandiose claims never seem to match the reality of a situation.