bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,328
- 2,180
How is that obvious?Don’t be stupid about this. If we actually embraced these concepts, obviously we would say so and defend them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How is that obvious?Don’t be stupid about this. If we actually embraced these concepts, obviously we would say so and defend them.
Parsing words... "control" is done by many means... When you have corporate cronies doing your bidding, why would you dissolve those controlling and doing your bidding?You guys cite this “control the means of production” without actually knowing what it means. Do you notice how Biden isn’t suggesting we get rid of private corporations?
No again you miscomprehend. He will never SAY it but his policies show it. I never said making laws is Communist. Try to stop lying....if you can.Oh political suicide huh? So in other words he doesn’t actually have communist policies. You’re just saying that’s what he wants. And no, you can’t say that making LAWS is communist simply because you don’t like them. You’re essentially saying that laws against murder and rape are communist simply because the federal government makes them illegal.
Post #46 does not give a SPECIFIC example. All you did in that post was offer your own summary of what the intent is. I want a specific example.I already covered that in post #46.
You didn’t say making laws was communist, but you didn’t explain what makes mask mandates communist. If the “central government” making laws is communist, then you would have to explain why making murder illegal is communist.No again you mis comprhend. He will never SAY it but his policies show it. I never said making laws is Communist. Try to stop lying....if you can.
Then why did you say that? Comparing mask mandates to laws against murder is so ridiculous as to be loony. If that's all ya got, I suggest you stand down, take your ball and go home.You didn’t say making laws was communist, but you didn’t explain what makes mask mandates communist. If the “central government” making laws is communist, then you would have to explain why making murder illegal is communist.
Lol.Not defending capitalism is evidence enough. Calls for equality and equity is also revealing. Sounds like:
"From each according to his ability to each according to his need." -Karl Marx
You said the central government making laws is communist. If that’s not what you meant, then explain it lol. You did not make a distinguishing point that explains why mask mandates is communism. You simply referred to central government control. An entity that also makes murder illegal.Then why did you say that? Comparing mask mandates to laws against murder is so ridiculous as to be loony. If that's all ya got, I suggest you stand down, take your ball and go home.
Because it does, you slimy little communist shit twinkle-toed cocksucker.Do you notice how no one on the American left ever actually talks about communism or Marxism being concepts the US should embrace? For whatever reason, republicans are convinced this is the case. Why I have no idea. We certainly won’t ever talk about abolishing capitalism, specifically.
Your party courts blacks to vote for you guys and blacks want communism.Why does the right think the American leftwing political ideology relates to Marxism or communism?
What specific democrat policies are communist?
Religious communites do not equate to the Federal Government. In America, folks are free to practice their own religion but NOT free to make every one else adhere to their beliefs.Lol.
“To each according to needs” comes from the Book of Acts documenting the practices of early Christian communities in Jerusalem. In the Book of Acts, believers “were together and had all things in common” and sold their possessions and distributed the proceeds within the community “as any had needs.”In “Voyage en Icarie,” Cabet tells of a fictional community who practice similar communal living arrangements. He later went to the U.S. and founded a number of “Icarian communities” in the second half of the 19th century, that practiced communal ownership of goods and were governed by egalitarian ideals.“From each according to ability,” is likewise found in the Book of Acts: “So the disciples determined, everyone according to his ability, to send relief to the brothers living in Judea.” Cabet and Blanc both construed this phrase as a call for Christian servitude. They believed society to be a cooperative venture in which people of means should contribute more.‘From each according to ability; to each according to need’ – tracing the biblical roots of socialism’s enduring slogan
At the height of Reaganism, close to half of Americans believed a phrase popularized by Karl Marx actually derived from the US Constitution. It doesn’t, but scholars have traced it to the Bible.theconversation.com
What specific democrat policies are communist?
Also, are you suggesting satan actually exists?
Lol. Way to ignore the origins of the phrase under discussion.Religious communites do not equate to the Federal Government. In America, folks are free to practice their own religion but NOT free to make every one else adhere to their beliefs.
Lol.
“To each according to needs” comes from the Book of Acts documenting the practices of early Christian communities in Jerusalem. In the Book of Acts, believers “were together and had all things in common” and sold their possessions and distributed the proceeds within the community “as any had needs.”In “Voyage en Icarie,” Cabet tells of a fictional community who practice similar communal living arrangements. He later went to the U.S. and founded a number of “Icarian communities” in the second half of the 19th century, that practiced communal ownership of goods and were governed by egalitarian ideals.“From each according to ability,” is likewise found in the Book of Acts: “So the disciples determined, everyone according to his ability, to send relief to the brothers living in Judea.” Cabet and Blanc both construed this phrase as a call for Christian servitude. They believed society to be a cooperative venture in which people of means should contribute more.‘From each according to ability; to each according to need’ – tracing the biblical roots of socialism’s enduring slogan
At the height of Reaganism, close to half of Americans believed a phrase popularized by Karl Marx actually derived from the US Constitution. It doesn’t, but scholars have traced it to the Bible.theconversation.com
The OP has no point.The right wing loons attracted to this thread are determined to prove the OP's point.