Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Female store owners shouldnt be beaten with 2x4's either. Do you have a way to stop people from doing bad things? You better have a damn good way, otherwise what is the point of your democrat riots?To use non-lethal force to subdue the person. And choking off a person's breathing for 8 mins when they are clearly unable to breath does not fit the definition of non-lethal force. I suspect that the immediate firing was due to violation of police dept's regulations. I rather doubt buying cigarettes with a counterfeit $20 bill should resulted in that kind of response.Whenever you have a black person die at the hands of a white cop, the first reaction is racist....he/sh murdered our precious son/daughter/father/mother/cousin/brother/sister.She can't understand why looting bothers people more than black people dying at the hands of the police. That is not a slip up. That's what she believes as do most sane people.It's a beautiful thing when democrats accidentally slip up, let their guard down, and get HONEST with the public!This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
When protests turn violent as they often do with such hot issues, the protesters lose public support which was the very reason for the protests. The public begins to sympathies with small store owners who are being hurt. Protesting police violence does about as much good as protesting death and taxes. Nothing ever seems to change.
No, she ASSUMES that looting bothers people more than black people dying at the hands of the police, and then she adopts a tone of moral superiority and condemnation on the basis of her assumption.
The truth is that decent people across the nation, of all races, are outraged at George Floyd's death, while also considering rioting and looting to be evil and unacceptable. Most people are able to object to multiple forms of evil all at the same time. We're even capable of differentiating between protesting and looting.
Whenever you have a white person die at the hands of a black cop, the first reaction is...nothing.
Whites die at the hands of cops far in excess than blacks at the hands of cops.
The falsely called "Democrat" party (it's actually now a Marxist party) likes to keep fomenting the idea that blacks are victims, especially around election time. Apparently, the newest video shows Floyd struggling with the cops as they were trying to put him in their car. That doesn't excuse that he died at the hands of cops. I am sure that in keeping Floyd pinned down, that the cop was not intending to kill him. This is a case of, at most, involuntary manslaughter.
Let's put you in the position of being a police officer and you have to arrest someone for a crime they just committed (how serious or not the crime was is irrelevant, you are per the law, required to arrest the criminal). That criminal, regardless of his or her color, insists that he/she isn't about to be arrested and turns to walk away. NOW...your response as a police officer is:
This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
Socialist Seattle Councilmember Says She Can’t Figure Out Why ‘Looting Bothers People’ ⋆ The Washington Sentinel
Because it doesn't affect her.
If they were looting her own home, then looting would bother people.
It's that simple. All the people who approve of all of this, are people it does not directly affect.
Yes, but what relationship does that have to her position that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life. She is not condoning looting. She is saying we should be more concerned about killing people that stealing store merchandise.The looters are killing people too.I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
I know a few females that should be beaten by a 2x4.Female store owners shouldnt be beaten with 2x4's either. Do you have a way to stop people from doing bad things? You better have a damn good way, otherwise what is the point of your democrat riots?To use non-lethal force to subdue the person. And choking off a person's breathing for 8 mins when they are clearly unable to breath does not fit the definition of non-lethal force. I suspect that the immediate firing was due to violation of police dept's regulations. I rather doubt buying cigarettes with a counterfeit $20 bill should resulted in that kind of response.Whenever you have a black person die at the hands of a white cop, the first reaction is racist....he/sh murdered our precious son/daughter/father/mother/cousin/brother/sister.She can't understand why looting bothers people more than black people dying at the hands of the police. That is not a slip up. That's what she believes as do most sane people.It's a beautiful thing when democrats accidentally slip up, let their guard down, and get HONEST with the public!This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
When protests turn violent as they often do with such hot issues, the protesters lose public support which was the very reason for the protests. The public begins to sympathies with small store owners who are being hurt. Protesting police violence does about as much good as protesting death and taxes. Nothing ever seems to change.
No, she ASSUMES that looting bothers people more than black people dying at the hands of the police, and then she adopts a tone of moral superiority and condemnation on the basis of her assumption.
The truth is that decent people across the nation, of all races, are outraged at George Floyd's death, while also considering rioting and looting to be evil and unacceptable. Most people are able to object to multiple forms of evil all at the same time. We're even capable of differentiating between protesting and looting.
Whenever you have a white person die at the hands of a black cop, the first reaction is...nothing.
Whites die at the hands of cops far in excess than blacks at the hands of cops.
The falsely called "Democrat" party (it's actually now a Marxist party) likes to keep fomenting the idea that blacks are victims, especially around election time. Apparently, the newest video shows Floyd struggling with the cops as they were trying to put him in their car. That doesn't excuse that he died at the hands of cops. I am sure that in keeping Floyd pinned down, that the cop was not intending to kill him. This is a case of, at most, involuntary manslaughter.
Let's put you in the position of being a police officer and you have to arrest someone for a crime they just committed (how serious or not the crime was is irrelevant, you are per the law, required to arrest the criminal). That criminal, regardless of his or her color, insists that he/she isn't about to be arrested and turns to walk away. NOW...your response as a police officer is:
So lets hear it. How do you guys plan on stopping people from doing bad things in the future? What exactly do you want us to do?
You might try reading what the woman actually said as oppose to what you are reading into what she said.She sure as heck condoning looting. IMHO. I think i can be concerned about loss of life and destruction of our country at the same time.Yes, but what relationship does that have to her position that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life. She is not condoning looting. She is saying we should be more concerned about killing people that stealing store merchandise.The looters are killing people too.I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
She is trying to minimize the destruction that democrats are wreaking on our country. It isnt going to work.You might try reading what the woman actually said as oppose to what you are reading into what she said.She sure as heck condoning looting. IMHO. I think i can be concerned about loss of life and destruction of our country at the same time.Yes, but what relationship does that have to her position that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life. She is not condoning looting. She is saying we should be more concerned about killing people that stealing store merchandise.The looters are killing people too.I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
There is no way to stop people from doing bad things. The protests were about how people who do bad things should be treated; bad things meaning being black in a high crime area.Female store owners shouldnt be beaten with 2x4's either. Do you have a way to stop people from doing bad things? You better have a damn good way, otherwise what is the point of your democrat riots?To use non-lethal force to subdue the person. And choking off a person's breathing for 8 mins when they are clearly unable to breath does not fit the definition of non-lethal force. I suspect that the immediate firing was due to violation of police dept's regulations. I rather doubt buying cigarettes with a counterfeit $20 bill should resulted in that kind of response.Whenever you have a black person die at the hands of a white cop, the first reaction is racist....he/sh murdered our precious son/daughter/father/mother/cousin/brother/sister.She can't understand why looting bothers people more than black people dying at the hands of the police. That is not a slip up. That's what she believes as do most sane people.It's a beautiful thing when democrats accidentally slip up, let their guard down, and get HONEST with the public!This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
When protests turn violent as they often do with such hot issues, the protesters lose public support which was the very reason for the protests. The public begins to sympathies with small store owners who are being hurt. Protesting police violence does about as much good as protesting death and taxes. Nothing ever seems to change.
No, she ASSUMES that looting bothers people more than black people dying at the hands of the police, and then she adopts a tone of moral superiority and condemnation on the basis of her assumption.
The truth is that decent people across the nation, of all races, are outraged at George Floyd's death, while also considering rioting and looting to be evil and unacceptable. Most people are able to object to multiple forms of evil all at the same time. We're even capable of differentiating between protesting and looting.
Whenever you have a white person die at the hands of a black cop, the first reaction is...nothing.
Whites die at the hands of cops far in excess than blacks at the hands of cops.
The falsely called "Democrat" party (it's actually now a Marxist party) likes to keep fomenting the idea that blacks are victims, especially around election time. Apparently, the newest video shows Floyd struggling with the cops as they were trying to put him in their car. That doesn't excuse that he died at the hands of cops. I am sure that in keeping Floyd pinned down, that the cop was not intending to kill him. This is a case of, at most, involuntary manslaughter.
Let's put you in the position of being a police officer and you have to arrest someone for a crime they just committed (how serious or not the crime was is irrelevant, you are per the law, required to arrest the criminal). That criminal, regardless of his or her color, insists that he/she isn't about to be arrested and turns to walk away. NOW...your response as a police officer is:
So lets hear it. How do you guys plan on stopping people from doing bad things in the future? What exactly do you want us to do?
Those who rebuke violent responses to injustice should ask themselves: How should the oppressed respond to their oppressors? How should the nation respond to political dissent? How do the oppressed procure power? Throughout history, black people have employed violence, nonviolence, marches, and boycotts. Only one thing is clear—there is no form of black protest that the opposition will sanction.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
Socialist Seattle Councilmember Says She Can’t Figure Out Why ‘Looting Bothers People’ ⋆ The Washington Sentinel
Because it doesn't affect her.
If they were looting her own home, then looting would bother people.
It's that simple. All the people who approve of all of this, are people it does not directly affect.
My sister, who is a leftist bully, was ranting at someone on Facebook the other day that they needed to "check their white privilege" if they didn't understand the "anger in the black community expressed by the rioting and looting", to which I said, "Bitch, you're living in a safe, expensive white community 20 miles from the riots, cheering on people destroying other people's neighborhoods. If that's not 'white privilege', I don't know what is."
www.theatlantic.com
And if looting wasn't inevitably accompanied by violent assaults, arson, stuff like that, you might be making a real point.
Do you value your property more than your life??
Of course we all pay bigger premiums to cover insurance claims.
What a fucking ignorant bitch. How do you left wing fucktards vote for people who don’t even understand how insurance works?
Well, yeah, and Nero liked to play the fiddle.
These mass demonstrations are a perfect place for the virus to spread. There is only two subjects for the media now, the protests and covid. Trump is having to come up with a lot crazy shit in order to get attention.
Depending on the state you live in, you could go to jail protecting your property depending on the circumstances. If I shot someone over a theft of property, it would have to be really valuable to put up with legal shit that would follow.Do you value your property more than your life??
No, but I value my property more than I value your life, especially if you're trying to steal or destroy my property.
Do you value your own life more than you value my property? Then keep your filthy hands off of my property.
Humans suck.
I think people clearly want to see rioters and looters being clubbed down and herded into police vans.
My sister, who is a leftist bully, was ranting at someone on Facebook the other day that they needed to "check their white privilege" if they didn't understand the "anger in the black community expressed by the rioting and looting", to which I said, "Bitch, you're living in a safe, expensive white community 20 miles from the riots, cheering on people destroying other people's neighborhoods. If that's not 'white privilege', I don't know what is."
www.12up.com
Those who rebuke violent responses to injustice should ask themselves: How should the oppressed respond to their oppressors? How should the nation respond to political dissent? How do the oppressed procure power? Throughout history, black people have employed violence, nonviolence, marches, and boycotts. Only one thing is clear—there is no form of black protest that the opposition will sanction.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
Socialist Seattle Councilmember Says She Can’t Figure Out Why ‘Looting Bothers People’ ⋆ The Washington Sentinel
Because it doesn't affect her.
If they were looting her own home, then looting would bother people.
It's that simple. All the people who approve of all of this, are people it does not directly affect.
My sister, who is a leftist bully, was ranting at someone on Facebook the other day that they needed to "check their white privilege" if they didn't understand the "anger in the black community expressed by the rioting and looting", to which I said, "Bitch, you're living in a safe, expensive white community 20 miles from the riots, cheering on people destroying other people's neighborhoods. If that's not 'white privilege', I don't know what is."
Since the beginning of this country, riots and violent rhetoric have been markers of patriotism. When our Founding Fathers fought for independence, violence was the clarion call. Phrases such as “Live free or die,” “Give me liberty or give me death,” and “Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God” echoed throughout the nation, and continue today. Force and violence have always been used as weapons to defend liberty, because—as John Adams once said in reference to the colonists’ treatment by the British—“We won’t be their Negroes.”
Black rebellion and protest, though, have historically never been coupled with allegiance to American democracy. Today, peaceful demonstrations and violent riots alike have erupted across the country in response to police brutality and the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery. Yet the language used to refer to protesters has included looters, thugs, and even claims that they are un-American. The philosophy of force and violence to obtain freedom has long been employed by white people and explicitly denied to black Americans.
The Double Standard of the American Riot
The nationwide protests against police killings have been called un-American by critics, but rebellion has always been used to defend liberty.
Regardless of one's skin color, if one is a criminal, I don't have much sympathy for them, especially if they repeatedly commit crimes after being arrested. Get rid of them, I say.There is no way to stop people from doing bad things. The protests were about how people who do bad things should be treated; bad things meaning being black in a high crime area.Female store owners shouldnt be beaten with 2x4's either. Do you have a way to stop people from doing bad things? You better have a damn good way, otherwise what is the point of your democrat riots?To use non-lethal force to subdue the person. And choking off a person's breathing for 8 mins when they are clearly unable to breath does not fit the definition of non-lethal force. I suspect that the immediate firing was due to violation of police dept's regulations. I rather doubt buying cigarettes with a counterfeit $20 bill should resulted in that kind of response.Whenever you have a black person die at the hands of a white cop, the first reaction is racist....he/sh murdered our precious son/daughter/father/mother/cousin/brother/sister.She can't understand why looting bothers people more than black people dying at the hands of the police. That is not a slip up. That's what she believes as do most sane people.It's a beautiful thing when democrats accidentally slip up, let their guard down, and get HONEST with the public!This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
When protests turn violent as they often do with such hot issues, the protesters lose public support which was the very reason for the protests. The public begins to sympathies with small store owners who are being hurt. Protesting police violence does about as much good as protesting death and taxes. Nothing ever seems to change.
No, she ASSUMES that looting bothers people more than black people dying at the hands of the police, and then she adopts a tone of moral superiority and condemnation on the basis of her assumption.
The truth is that decent people across the nation, of all races, are outraged at George Floyd's death, while also considering rioting and looting to be evil and unacceptable. Most people are able to object to multiple forms of evil all at the same time. We're even capable of differentiating between protesting and looting.
Whenever you have a white person die at the hands of a black cop, the first reaction is...nothing.
Whites die at the hands of cops far in excess than blacks at the hands of cops.
The falsely called "Democrat" party (it's actually now a Marxist party) likes to keep fomenting the idea that blacks are victims, especially around election time. Apparently, the newest video shows Floyd struggling with the cops as they were trying to put him in their car. That doesn't excuse that he died at the hands of cops. I am sure that in keeping Floyd pinned down, that the cop was not intending to kill him. This is a case of, at most, involuntary manslaughter.
Let's put you in the position of being a police officer and you have to arrest someone for a crime they just committed (how serious or not the crime was is irrelevant, you are per the law, required to arrest the criminal). That criminal, regardless of his or her color, insists that he/she isn't about to be arrested and turns to walk away. NOW...your response as a police officer is:
So lets hear it. How do you guys plan on stopping people from doing bad things in the future? What exactly do you want us to do?
The Dems are a death cult. And Blacks have been their pawns for 50 years.Name the dem who is pro life.I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
Human life?
Hundred bucks says she's a fucking proabort.
