- Mar 31, 2009
- 94,813
- 71,289
- 3,605
It's not an act
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Why does looting bother people?
- Thread starter Bloodrock444
- Start date
It's not an act
Eric Arthur Blair
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2015
- 25,955
- 15,959
- 1,415
It's just a lie to say everyday blacks are losing their lives because of the police.you right wingers are so concerned about looting , but not about death of the Blackman.
It's another lie to say that people that abhor the senseless violence of looters are not
also incensed by the death of Floyd.
You can't string two sentences together without puking out an equal number of lies.
What would you like to tell the black employees of firebombed businesses who now are without
any means of income? But, oh yeah....you don't give a fuck!
I've stepped in stuff on the sidewalk with more integrity and sense than you.
Last edited:
Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
These mass demonstrations are a perfect place for the virus to spread. There is only two subjects for the media now, the protests and covid. Trump is having to come up with a lot crazy shit in order to get attention.It's still early, the media wants to keep this going. Notice how thousands of people in a little space won't spread cova?The largest and bloodiest race riot in the country occurred in Tulsa Ok. in 1921. It was stared not because of a single death. All it took was just one white man who thought he heard a woman screen and saw a black man running away. The death toll exceeded an estimated 300 and a large part of the city was destroyed.1 man, which is bad. But how many more has been killed an lost their livelihood over 1 man dead?I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
Sorry, I'm drawing a blank on anything particularly crazy. A couple of personal feud tweets with various people.
Bloodrock444
Active Member
- May 29, 2020
- 128
- 152
- 43
- Thread starter
- #104
Right on bro!!!It's just a lie to say everyday blacks are losing their lives because of the police.you right wingers are so concerned about looting , but not about death of the Blackman.
It's another lie to say that people that abhor the senseless violence of looters are not
also incensed by the death of Floyd.
You can't string two sentences together without puking out an equal number of lies.
What would you like to tell the black employees of firebombed businesses who now are without
any means of income? But, of yeah, you don't give a fuck!
I've stepped in stuff on the sidewalk with more integrity and sense than you.
The two biggest events in the country this year has been the virus and riots. The purpose of the media is making money just like any business. If people didn't watch what they produced, it would disappear overnight. The media is not a public service and has not been for many years.I started a thread on how the rioters could spread the virus. The media and dem holdovers are never going to let a crisis go to waste.It's still early, the media wants to keep this going. Notice how thousands of people in a little space won't spread cova?The largest and bloodiest race riot in the country occurred in Tulsa Ok. in 1921. It was stared not because of a single death. All it took was just one white man who thought he heard a woman screen and saw a black man running away. The death toll exceeded an estimated 300 and a large part of the city was destroyed.1 man, which is bad. But how many more has been killed an lost their livelihood over 1 man dead?I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
About 60 years ago TV news programs became profit centers. By the end of the 1970’s, the news division typically produced 60% of a station’s profits. In the 1980’s, large conglomerates bought many of the top media companies. This forced media corporations to become more aware of profits and stockholders. News stations became increasingly concerned about the entertainment value of the news. Then came CNN, FOX News, MSNBC, and millions of websites intent on cashing in. The focus became giving the people what they wanted to see, rather than what they needed to know. Thus if people wanted to watch burning and looting all day every day, the media would give it to them.
Eric Arthur Blair
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2015
- 25,955
- 15,959
- 1,415
I think people clearly want to see rioters and looters being clubbed down and herded into police vans.
These mass demonstrations are a perfect place for the virus to spread. There is only two subjects for the media now, the protests and covid. Trump is having to come up with a lot crazy shit in order to get attention.It's still early, the media wants to keep this going. Notice how thousands of people in a little space won't spread cova?The largest and bloodiest race riot in the country occurred in Tulsa Ok. in 1921. It was stared not because of a single death. All it took was just one white man who thought he heard a woman screen and saw a black man running away. The death toll exceeded an estimated 300 and a large part of the city was destroyed.1 man, which is bad. But how many more has been killed an lost their livelihood over 1 man dead?I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
Covid? What is that? That was last week's news. I notice that none of the Democratic leaders are upset with people breaking any of the virus rules.
This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
Socialist Seattle Councilmember Says She Can’t Figure Out Why ‘Looting Bothers People’ ⋆ The Washington Sentinel
Because it doesn't affect her.
If they were looting her own home, then looting would bother people.
It's that simple. All the people who approve of all of this, are people it does not directly affect.
- Dec 29, 2008
- 36,359
- 19,266
- 1,905
The looters are killing people too.I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
Again, if it direct affected you, you would be more upset.
If it was your home being looted, and your home being set on fire, and your family out on the street with no place to go....
You would not be sitting there telling your children and wife....
"Yeah but you shouldn't be upset about it... I mean after all... it's not like a career criminal who abandoned his kids was killed by a police officer"
It's easy to say that, when your life is fine.
Whenever you have a black person die at the hands of a white cop, the first reaction is racist....he/sh murdered our precious son/daughter/father/mother/cousin/brother/sister.She can't understand why looting bothers people more than black people dying at the hands of the police. That is not a slip up. That's what she believes as do most sane people.It's a beautiful thing when democrats accidentally slip up, let their guard down, and get HONEST with the public!This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
When protests turn violent as they often do with such hot issues, the protesters lose public support which was the very reason for the protests. The public begins to sympathies with small store owners who are being hurt. Protesting police violence does about as much good as protesting death and taxes. Nothing ever seems to change.
No, she ASSUMES that looting bothers people more than black people dying at the hands of the police, and then she adopts a tone of moral superiority and condemnation on the basis of her assumption.
The truth is that decent people across the nation, of all races, are outraged at George Floyd's death, while also considering rioting and looting to be evil and unacceptable. Most people are able to object to multiple forms of evil all at the same time. We're even capable of differentiating between protesting and looting.
Whenever you have a white person die at the hands of a black cop, the first reaction is...nothing.
Whites die at the hands of cops far in excess than blacks at the hands of cops.
The falsely called "Democrat" party (it's actually now a Marxist party) likes to keep fomenting the idea that blacks are victims, especially around election time. Apparently, the newest video shows Floyd struggling with the cops as they were trying to put him in their car. That doesn't excuse that he died at the hands of cops. I am sure that in keeping Floyd pinned down, that the cop was not intending to kill him. This is a case of, at most, involuntary manslaughter.
Let's put you in the position of being a police officer and you have to arrest someone for a crime they just committed (how serious or not the crime was is irrelevant, you are per the law, required to arrest the criminal). That criminal, regardless of his or her color, insists that he/she isn't about to be arrested and turns to walk away. NOW...your response as a police officer is:
Yes, but what relationship does that have to her position that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life. She is not condoning looting. She is saying we should be more concerned about killing people that stealing store merchandise.The looters are killing people too.I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
To use non-lethal force to subdue the person. And choking off a person's breathing for 8 mins when they are clearly unable to breath does not fit the definition of non-lethal force. I suspect that the immediate firing was due to violation of police dept's regulations. I rather doubt buying cigarettes with a counterfeit $20 bill should resulted in that kind of response.Whenever you have a black person die at the hands of a white cop, the first reaction is racist....he/sh murdered our precious son/daughter/father/mother/cousin/brother/sister.She can't understand why looting bothers people more than black people dying at the hands of the police. That is not a slip up. That's what she believes as do most sane people.It's a beautiful thing when democrats accidentally slip up, let their guard down, and get HONEST with the public!This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
When protests turn violent as they often do with such hot issues, the protesters lose public support which was the very reason for the protests. The public begins to sympathies with small store owners who are being hurt. Protesting police violence does about as much good as protesting death and taxes. Nothing ever seems to change.
No, she ASSUMES that looting bothers people more than black people dying at the hands of the police, and then she adopts a tone of moral superiority and condemnation on the basis of her assumption.
The truth is that decent people across the nation, of all races, are outraged at George Floyd's death, while also considering rioting and looting to be evil and unacceptable. Most people are able to object to multiple forms of evil all at the same time. We're even capable of differentiating between protesting and looting.
Whenever you have a white person die at the hands of a black cop, the first reaction is...nothing.
Whites die at the hands of cops far in excess than blacks at the hands of cops.
The falsely called "Democrat" party (it's actually now a Marxist party) likes to keep fomenting the idea that blacks are victims, especially around election time. Apparently, the newest video shows Floyd struggling with the cops as they were trying to put him in their car. That doesn't excuse that he died at the hands of cops. I am sure that in keeping Floyd pinned down, that the cop was not intending to kill him. This is a case of, at most, involuntary manslaughter.
Let's put you in the position of being a police officer and you have to arrest someone for a crime they just committed (how serious or not the crime was is irrelevant, you are per the law, required to arrest the criminal). That criminal, regardless of his or her color, insists that he/she isn't about to be arrested and turns to walk away. NOW...your response as a police officer is:
Bloodrock444
Active Member
- May 29, 2020
- 128
- 152
- 43
- Thread starter
- #114
She sure as heck condoning looting. IMHO. I think i can be concerned about loss of life and destruction of our country at the same time.Yes, but what relationship does that have to her position that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life. She is not condoning looting. She is saying we should be more concerned about killing people that stealing store merchandise.The looters are killing people too.I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
The perception that people care more about looting than police violence comes from the media coverage of the riots. The center of attention is being shifted away from police violence to the violence of rioters which defeats the purpose of the protesters.What an ignorant bitch.
Looting bothers us SO MUCH MORE than “black people dying every day at the hands of police”?
Who said that? Can she name anyone?
How come a police officer killing one black man bothers her so much more than the tens of thousands of black men who kill other black men in Democratic run municipalities every year?
Every single day in this country, there are hundreds of time more violent crime than there is police brutality.
Yes, but what relationship does that have to her position that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life. She is not condoning looting. She is saying we should be more concerned about killing people that stealing store merchandise.The looters are killing people too.I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
By the same token, no one is saying looting is worse than the loss of life. Since the riots, at last I counted, nine people have lost their lives during these protests. I agree with her that loss of life is by far, no comparison.
However with nine more dead, to what end does the violence go?
Bloodrock444
Active Member
- May 29, 2020
- 128
- 152
- 43
- Thread starter
- #117
We are in a civil. I have never retired from the army. Just waiting for the call.Yes, but what relationship does that have to her position that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life. She is not condoning looting. She is saying we should be more concerned about killing people that stealing store merchandise.The looters are killing people too.I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
By the same token, no one is saying looting is worse than the loss of life. Since the riots, at last I counted, nine people have lost their lives during these protests. I agree with her that loss of life is by far, no comparison.
However with nine more dead, to what end does the violence go?
Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
Yes, but what relationship does that have to her position that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life. She is not condoning looting. She is saying we should be more concerned about killing people that stealing store merchandise.The looters are killing people too.I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
No, she's assuming that if you're upset about looting, that means you're not upset about George Floyd, because that fits her agenda.
- Dec 29, 2008
- 36,359
- 19,266
- 1,905
We arent concerned about killing people though, except for the very few that cops kill. When is the last time democrats even discussed the MANY black murderers who kill both blacks and whites; of which there are thousands every year?Yes, but what relationship does that have to her position that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life. She is not condoning looting. She is saying we should be more concerned about killing people that stealing store merchandise.The looters are killing people too.I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
Bloodrock444
Active Member
- May 29, 2020
- 128
- 152
- 43
- Thread starter
- #120
Eggsackly!!!Yes, but what relationship does that have to her position that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life. She is not condoning looting. She is saying we should be more concerned about killing people that stealing store merchandise.The looters are killing people too.I'm not a fan of hers but when you look at the whole context of the the discussion, it appears to me she's isn't defending looting so much as pointing out that it's ridiculous to be more upset about looting than at the loss of human life.This stupid assed Seattle far left radical council woman can't understand why looting bothers people. Does this mean she approves of looting? Obviously.
By the same token, no one is saying looting is worse than the loss of life. Since the riots, at last I counted, nine people have lost their lives during these protests. I agree with her that loss of life is by far, no comparison.
However with nine more dead, to what end does the violence go?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 109
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 253
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 283
- Replies
- 39
- Views
- 445
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 47
- Views
- 96
- Replies
- 540
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 454
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 51
- Views
- 193
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8092
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-