I agree with you about the petty Clinton bashing, of the pres in the past and senator more recently. I think that is why if some of the newer members were to look back a year and a half or more, they'd find some of us spent a lot of time trying to get one or two members to knock it off. Now we just seem to ignore them.
Now some might be of the opinion that the former pardoned contributions thread is along those lines. I don't. For the simple reason, like my concern about Ron Paul's neo-nazi backers, there are some things that the candidate should have by now, told someone to watch for.
For Clinton, that certainly would be ties with any of those involved with those types of ties to the past. For any candidate, when
significant contributions from sources that are seen by most to be hate groups or criminal groups, along with endorsements not rejected it is something that needs to be illuminated.
These are judgments that to me are deal breakers. As for Clinton, her husband
also gave clemency to a bunch of FALN terrorists, basically tell them to go 'and sin no more.' They killed officers and innocents. What if instead that was who was sending in the contributions? How different than the Stormfront would that be? With the exception that we KNOW FALN committed acts, take a look at some of those backing Paul.
