progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 60,752
- 36,890
- 2,615
Lie.They make assumptions which we simply do not know whether they are actually correct or not.Without looking back, I'm not sure that he claimed it was proof; I think he claimed evidence of it. Humans very well might have coexisted with dinosaurs; we simply do not know. We can't go back in time to see what actually happened.
What? Don't Carbon Dating, strata levels, ice testing, all agree that there was a 65 million year gap give or take between humans and dinosaurs?
Yeah I didn't live at the same time as Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln. But to say "the evidence doesn't matter, since you didn't live then, you can't go back to see that they actually didn't live in the same time period" is pure BS. Even if some conspiracy nutjob wants to go out and show his scam that historians are wrong about those two's lives, that theory is BS.
Especially when the best they can use to attempt to debunk proven science ends up again and again being found to be intentional lies. Baugh for example bought a skeleton, and it was proven at time of purchase he knew it to be 200-300 years old. Then he intentionally misrepresented that same skeleton as from the Cretacious period 145 million or so years ago.
those test are based on assumptions that cant be proven,,,
all carbon dating is not reliable and also there is noway to know the history of the item being tested
and strata layers are based on millions of yrs that cant be proven while a rapid layering is easily proven
and ice layer are as wrong as they come because you can get several layers per yr where they are only counted as one per yr
Carbon dating and other methods are reliable. Obviously you know nothing of the methodology.
instead of calling him a liar why not prove it and show us you arent an attention seeking troll