Actually, you're less hateful. They go out of their way to target Christians, to troll threads, post deliberate and blatant lies. They attempt to shut down the opposition first by lying, then via censorship, while they blatantly and knowingly spread propaganda meant to diminish liberty, re-create history, and establish a totalitarian government here in the US.
I have yet to see you posting the hateful nonsense they do. But they will claim you are hateful...as they label anything they disagree with as 1. illegal, 2. hateful, 3. racist.
That's what propagandists do, in order to justify the silencing/imprisonment/death of the opposition. It starts just like this.
"Christianity" is comprised of tens of hundreds of different denominations.
Just like the contests between the Catholics and Protestant these differing denominations exist because men either can't agree or get along.
At the time the framers of the Constitution were busy making the blueprint for the US government, I doubt if they gave much thought to Islam or Judaism becoming the threats they are today.
It is much more likely that they didn't want someone like Queen "Bloody" Mary arising to power and burning people who didn't join the Catholic Church or Henry the VIII chopping people's head off who didn't want to become Protestants.
http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/queen-mary.html
The ebb and flow of freedom continued through the 1540's...and into the 1550's. After King Henry VIII, King Edward VI took the throne, and after his death, the reign of Queen “Bloody” Mary was the next obstacle to the printing of the Bible in English. She was possessed in her quest to return England to the Roman Church. In 1555, John "Thomas Matthew" Rogers and Thomas Cranmer were both burned at the stake. Mary went on to burn reformers at the stake by the hundreds for the "crime" of being a Protestant. This era was known as the Marian Exile, and the refugees fled from England with little hope of ever seeing their home or friends again. During their exile, they produced the famous 1560 Geneva Bible which was "The Bible of the Protestant Reformation", from which many home-schooled their children.
“Bloody Mary”… Relentless Papist and Mass-Murderer
Mary had always rejected and resented the break with Rome that her father had instituted and his subsequent establishment of the Anglican Church that had flowed from her half-brother's protestantism, and now she tried to turn England back to Roman Catholicism. This effort was carried out by force, and hundreds of Protestant leaders were executed. The first was John Rogers (a.k.a. “Thomas Matthews”
, the printer of the “Matthews-Tyndale Bible”. His execution was followed by the execution of former Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Cranmer, who was primarily responsible for the printing of the “Great Bible”. Hundreds more would follow in Mary’s bloody reign of terror. This earned the queen the title of “Bloody Mary”.
Thomas Becket - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thomas Becket (also known as Saint Thomas of Canterbury, Thomas of London,[1] and later Thomas à Becket;[note 1] c. 1118 (or 1120) – 29 December 1170) was Archbishop of Canterbury from 1162 until his murder in 1170. He is venerated as a saint and martyr by both the Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion. He engaged in conflict with Henry II of England over the rights and privileges of the Church and was murdered by followers of the king in Canterbury Cathedral. Soon after his death, he was canonised by Pope Alexander III.
One could be murdered for being a Catholic by Protestants, or for being Protestant by Catholics.
Even among Protestant denominations there are people who would do the same to each other.
The Founders new this and tried to set up a system of government which would prevent fanatics like these and other tyrants from acquiring so much political power that they could order anyone executed.
The NEO-CONS have succeeded in giving this kind of power into the hands of their puppet Yomamma.
Since the Neo-Cons have supplanted the original Republican party, and since it was Neo-Cons and Zionists who ensured the success of 9/11 to drag the US into war(s) unnecessarily, sponsored the "Patriot" Act, the NDAA, the Expatriation Act, declared the US to be a battle ground, put a velvet form of martial law in place, and etc,
it is only reasonable that we give them credit for their work.
And since the Ne-Cons were started by Jews and receive their marching orders from the Zionist faction, we have the Jews in general to thank for all of this.
They know what I am saying is true. But they let on like I'm saying it because I "hate"
them.
Somehow we are all supposed to believe that only Anglo Saxon non-Jewish whites, Christians , and Muslims are the only people in the world capable of conspiring to get their way and hating their enemies.
I assure you. There is nothing in the "WASP" genetic code which guarantees "racism" or hatred anymore than that which exists in the Ashkenazim/Khazar Klan.
The things I have been discussing are nothing less than political realities which they want to deny because they know that once the majority of people in the US realize it they will no longer be so easy to manipulate via the media.
I admit that I too was deceived by Bumbling Bush and all the lies about terrorist camps and "WMDs" and Yellow Cake.
I sorely resent being taken for a Putz . But that's exactly what the Neo- CONs have done to the US. And they continue on a course which can lead nowhere except to the collapse of the US as a sovereign nation.
Those Jews who are seeking a "Mashianic Age" will welcome this demise as a prelude to the coming "New World Order" which they no doubt realize will actuality be a JEW World Order.
Why? Because they know who pulls the purse strings of the US and other countries like France Germany, and England. They know who controls the World Bank, the IMF, the Federal Reserve, and other major financial institutions which have global power.
The Jews are no more about freedom of religion than the Muslims are or they wouldn't have had Daddy Bush sign the House Resolution of "Noahide" Law and they wouldn't be so active and MILITANT in their efforts to squelch the doctrines of Christ. And that's why you don't see very many of them coming out to denounce some of intentions and motives of some prominent members of their own "tribe". Anyone who does is "a self hating Jew".
Why do you think the Israelites ban evangelistic proselytizing in Israel?
For the same reason they would ban it in the US and blot out the name of Christ altogether if they could. If the nincompoop JUDEO xtians continue supporting them unconditionally believing in the fairy tale that these imposters are "God's Chosen People" they may well succeed in doing so.
Hypocritical "Christians" notwithstanding, including all the modern day Marys and Henrys,
the proclamation of the Gospel of Christ should no more be silenced today than it was when the Apostles were murdered for not keeping their mouths shut about it.
If this nation sits on it's hands on it's big rump and yields complete control to the Jewish Zionist Social-Political Faction in the US they may wake up and realize that Christianity has died out in the general population and there will no more exist even the semblance of it.
The Apostle Paul spoke of men even in his day who were sewing discord, trying to make his life more difficult, and preaching the Gospel as a means of self promotion. But that didn't bother him too badly because as he said, "Nevertheless, the Gospel is preached."
The most important thing about all that was that the message got out.
The situation man is in today is no different than it was then as far as his appointment with death and the judgement that awaits them.
Societies which sanction "Christianity" and teach it, even if it is only mostly superficial, I believe will profit from doing so despite the Charlatans and hypocrites for the very reason that those pretenders must at least make an appearance of it whether it is a part of their inmost being or not. This is because of societal pressures put upon people to accept what is in vogue or the norm. I dislike PRETENSE as much as anyone here. But I won't allow the pretense of some to cause me to abandon my faith or wish to see it destroyed. Let them be hypocrites if that be the case. They will have to learn to overlook my weaknesses as well.
Today this social pressure to conform comes more from "Political Correctness" than it does from the true application of the doctrines of Christ.
And who is it that sets the tempo for "Political Correctness" if it isn't those who control the media?
And who is in charge of the media if it isn't the "Jews"?
I say "Jew" to refer to those who ascribe to the Machiavellian doctrines of Judaic Talmudism.
If anything, it is the Jewish coalitions who HATE the "WASPs".
Why?
Because they stand in the way of their "Mashianic Age" and the acquisition of all wealth and power for themselves.
Furthermore they resent any cultural or religious heritages which do not wreak of their own in just the manner that anyone else does.
It is true that many people are quick to fight over religious issues. This doesn't mean that Christ ordered them to do so. (Quite the contrary. This is the communist rationale for trying to eliminate it and anything else which would usurp a tittle of State power.
I don't accept their reasoning that Christian teachings are the cause of man's tendency to be that way.
People who want to do things which are condemned by the Bible naturally do not want those doctrines embraced by the public because such a public attitude would either prevent them from doing as they wish or make it very difficult for them to do so.
I agree whole heartedly that "Christians" ought to behave like Christians.
But the fact that many of them fail to or are Christian in name only is no good reason to dispose of the Gospel of Christ.
Why?
Because to a believer the Gospel of Christ is the power of salvation and the hope of everlasting life.
Jews, Marxists, and homos don't like this idea one bit because of the teachings associated with it that do not condone their private agendas.
Mark my word. Religious Jews can be every bit as adamant about getting their own way and just as militant as any Muslim or Christian.
No one can attribute all the sin and violence in the world to Christianity unless they confuse the person of Christ with other persons.
And Jews do not have the market cornered on acts of benevolence or the generation of peace.
Only a person lacking common sense could believe otherwise.
Even Buddhists and Hindus can be seen to erupt in fits of anger and to fight over things.
Human nature is human nature.
What people are TAUGHT can vary. And what people are TAUGHT CAN have an effect on their behavior!
A good parent tries to teach his child to do good. But since a child has a mind of his own, there is no 100% guarantee that he cannot rebel against that which others have tried to instill in him. This independence of will would exist under any other system.
Parents aren't perfect anymore than humans in general. The same thing is true with "Christians".
Destroying Christianity or trying to censor the teaching of it will not improve human behavior. If anything, the suppression of Biblical admonitions is bound to make it worse.
I can allow myself to get fuming mad because the world is such a Mucked up place. But it won't do me a bit of good to cut my own nose off to spite my face because of despair.
The hope in Christ that some people cling to provides a good reason NOT to despair and a rationale for not allowing anger to dictate his actions.
Marx can call that "the opiate of the masses". But what would Marx have to offer in exchange for it? Even if his "worker's paradise" was viable (it isn't) the absurdity of this life and the futility of all work would be exposed for the lack of any hope. The incentive to do good is much more likely to die in conditions where there are no consequences for misconduct. A Christian believes in a higher authority than man which exists even in the absence of police forces, a military, or any other human threat. His actions are commensurate with the will of God insofar as he is actually a Christian. His gets his guidance from the Bible, not the Communist or Humanist manifesto.
NO GOVERNMENT of man can offer a person the hope of eternal life. And no man made government can make this existence any less absurd if all you have in it is all there ever will be or you can ever hope for.
