Why is there a time limit on discovering alien life?
If a NASA chief believes that aliens will be discovered by 2025, that is her opinion. So what? It neither confirms nor refutes the existence of alien life. It's one person's opinion.
What evidence discovered by human probes discounts the idea of alien life elsewhere in the universe?
Why are you so fixated on grouping scientists into either atheist scientists or creation scientists?
due to lack of perspicacity.
Why is there a time limit on discovering alien life?
If a NASA chief believes that aliens will be discovered by 2025, that is her opinion. So what? It neither confirms nor refutes the existence of alien life. It's one person's opinion.
What evidence discovered by human probes discounts the idea of alien life elsewhere in the universe?
Why are you so fixated on grouping scientists into either atheist scientists or creation scientists?
You clearly don't get it and thus have no credibility. This is sad for one because there are many weak-minded people like you who believe in fake science and fairy tales. It is sad and pathetic and at the same time laughable
There is a time limit because aliens have been long overdue and NASA head honcho has claimed it.
For one, you do not understand the fine tuning facts. Even the atheist scientists understand it and have moved on to multiverses as the explanation. The trouble is there is no observational data or experiment to base their beliefs on.
There is no evidence of aliens whatsoever from the probes. The groups and people who do have credibility in this field -- Enrico Fermi, Frank Drake, SETI, Elon Musk and more have said intelligent aliens would have contacted us already. Also, we would have found a microbe or some basic type of life elsewhere. There have been more than enough probes sent out as I have stated. Thus, you do not understand the Drake equation and Fermi paradox and what it means. This has been explained to you in the past and yet you continue to ask and repeat the same boring questions.
Even after this, the intelligent people like myself and the creation scientists are subjected to ramblings by the leftist head of NASA that due to their superior technology aliens will be found. The technology is paid for by out tax dollars, that they will find a microbe and more. It's based on false hope such as water on Mars and false science. Thus, it's better to spend our money on something better like better space stations and to see if we can set up a supply station for them on the moon. Maybe we can set up a defense system there to prevent large asteroids from hitting our planet.
Finally, to answer your last question, it's the creation scientists who are left out. These are the people with the real observational science that there are no aliens. Why not believe them and spend our tax dollars on real science projects.
Bond, being a charlatan with little to know actual knowledge of this material, likes to take pages to make his points, framing them more as "they must be true, because what you said is false, according to the opinion of this blogger i just plagiarized"....as if what you or anyone else had for breakfast has any bearing on the truth of his desperate nonsense. If you want any actual insight into his overwrought talking points, simply visit creation.com and cut out the niddle man charlatan.
Why is there a time limit on discovering alien life?
If a NASA chief believes that aliens will be discovered by 2025, that is her opinion. So what? It neither confirms nor refutes the existence of alien life. It's one person's opinion.
What evidence discovered by human probes discounts the idea of alien life elsewhere in the universe?
Why are you so fixated on grouping scientists into either atheist scientists or creation scientists?
You clearly don't get it and thus have no credibility. This is sad for one because there are many weak-minded people like you who believe in fake science and fairy tales. It is sad and pathetic and at the same time laughable
There is a time limit because aliens have been long overdue and NASA head honcho has claimed it.
For one, you do not understand the fine tuning facts. Even the atheist scientists understand it and have moved on to multiverses as the explanation. The trouble is there is no observational data or experiment to base their beliefs on.
There is no evidence of aliens whatsoever from the probes. The groups and people who do have credibility in this field -- Enrico Fermi, Frank Drake, SETI, Elon Musk and more have said intelligent aliens would have contacted us already. Also, we would have found a microbe or some basic type of life elsewhere. There have been more than enough probes sent out as I have stated. Thus, you do not understand the Drake equation and Fermi paradox and what it means. This has been explained to you in the past and yet you continue to ask and repeat the same boring questions.
Even after this, the intelligent people like myself and the creation scientists are subjected to ramblings by the leftist head of NASA that due to their superior technology aliens will be found. The technology is paid for by out tax dollars, that they will find a microbe and more. It's based on false hope such as water on Mars and false science. Thus, it's better to spend our money on something better like better space stations and to see if we can set up a supply station for them on the moon. Maybe we can set up a defense system there to prevent large asteroids from hitting our planet.
Finally, to answer your last question, it's the creation scientists who are left out. These are the people with the real observational science that there are no aliens. Why not believe them and spend our tax dollars on real science projects.
Back to this?
Neither the Drake Equation nor the Fermi Paradox are any sort of definitive formula proving the non-existence of intelligent alien life.
How far into the universe do you think humanity has sent probes? If you didn't realize it, we've barely gotten anything outside of the solar system, and that is an almost infinitesimally small portion of the universe as far as we can tell.
I didn't ask you anything about people being left out of something. I asked why you group scientists as either atheist or creation scientists.
You seem to have an over-inflated idea of just how much humanity has gotten direct, close-up observational data about.
Why is there a time limit on discovering alien life?
If a NASA chief believes that aliens will be discovered by 2025, that is her opinion. So what? It neither confirms nor refutes the existence of alien life. It's one person's opinion.
What evidence discovered by human probes discounts the idea of alien life elsewhere in the universe?
Why are you so fixated on grouping scientists into either atheist scientists or creation scientists?
You clearly don't get it and thus have no credibility. This is sad for one because there are many weak-minded people like you who believe in fake science and fairy tales. It is sad and pathetic and at the same time laughable
There is a time limit because aliens have been long overdue and NASA head honcho has claimed it.
For one, you do not understand the fine tuning facts. Even the atheist scientists understand it and have moved on to multiverses as the explanation. The trouble is there is no observational data or experiment to base their beliefs on.
There is no evidence of aliens whatsoever from the probes. The groups and people who do have credibility in this field -- Enrico Fermi, Frank Drake, SETI, Elon Musk and more have said intelligent aliens would have contacted us already. Also, we would have found a microbe or some basic type of life elsewhere. There have been more than enough probes sent out as I have stated. Thus, you do not understand the Drake equation and Fermi paradox and what it means. This has been explained to you in the past and yet you continue to ask and repeat the same boring questions.
Even after this, the intelligent people like myself and the creation scientists are subjected to ramblings by the leftist head of NASA that due to their superior technology aliens will be found. The technology is paid for by out tax dollars, that they will find a microbe and more. It's based on false hope such as water on Mars and false science. Thus, it's better to spend our money on something better like better space stations and to see if we can set up a supply station for them on the moon. Maybe we can set up a defense system there to prevent large asteroids from hitting our planet.
Finally, to answer your last question, it's the creation scientists who are left out. These are the people with the real observational science that there are no aliens. Why not believe them and spend our tax dollars on real science projects.
Back to this?
Neither the Drake Equation nor the Fermi Paradox are any sort of definitive formula proving the non-existence of intelligent alien life.
How far into the universe do you think humanity has sent probes? If you didn't realize it, we've barely gotten anything outside of the solar system, and that is an almost infinitesimally small portion of the universe as far as we can tell.
I didn't ask you anything about people being left out of something. I asked why you group scientists as either atheist or creation scientists.
You seem to have an over-inflated idea of just how much humanity has gotten direct, close-up observational data about.
Bond, being a charlatan with little to know actual knowledge of this material, likes to take pages to make his points, framing them more as "they must be true, because what you said is false, according to the opinion of this blogger i just plagiarized"....as if what you or anyone else had for breakfast has any bearing on the truth of his desperate nonsense. If you want any actual insight into his overwrought talking points, simply visit creation.com and cut out the niddle man charlatan.
Why is there a time limit on discovering alien life?
If a NASA chief believes that aliens will be discovered by 2025, that is her opinion. So what? It neither confirms nor refutes the existence of alien life. It's one person's opinion.
What evidence discovered by human probes discounts the idea of alien life elsewhere in the universe?
Why are you so fixated on grouping scientists into either atheist scientists or creation scientists?
You clearly don't get it and thus have no credibility. This is sad for one because there are many weak-minded people like you who believe in fake science and fairy tales. It is sad and pathetic and at the same time laughable
There is a time limit because aliens have been long overdue and NASA head honcho has claimed it.
For one, you do not understand the fine tuning facts. Even the atheist scientists understand it and have moved on to multiverses as the explanation. The trouble is there is no observational data or experiment to base their beliefs on.
There is no evidence of aliens whatsoever from the probes. The groups and people who do have credibility in this field -- Enrico Fermi, Frank Drake, SETI, Elon Musk and more have said intelligent aliens would have contacted us already. Also, we would have found a microbe or some basic type of life elsewhere. There have been more than enough probes sent out as I have stated. Thus, you do not understand the Drake equation and Fermi paradox and what it means. This has been explained to you in the past and yet you continue to ask and repeat the same boring questions.
Even after this, the intelligent people like myself and the creation scientists are subjected to ramblings by the leftist head of NASA that due to their superior technology aliens will be found. The technology is paid for by out tax dollars, that they will find a microbe and more. It's based on false hope such as water on Mars and false science. Thus, it's better to spend our money on something better like better space stations and to see if we can set up a supply station for them on the moon. Maybe we can set up a defense system there to prevent large asteroids from hitting our planet.
Finally, to answer your last question, it's the creation scientists who are left out. These are the people with the real observational science that there are no aliens. Why not believe them and spend our tax dollars on real science projects.
Back to this?
Neither the Drake Equation nor the Fermi Paradox are any sort of definitive formula proving the non-existence of intelligent alien life.
How far into the universe do you think humanity has sent probes? If you didn't realize it, we've barely gotten anything outside of the solar system, and that is an almost infinitesimally small portion of the universe as far as we can tell.
I didn't ask you anything about people being left out of something. I asked why you group scientists as either atheist or creation scientists.
You seem to have an over-inflated idea of just how much humanity has gotten direct, close-up observational data about.
Why is there a time limit on discovering alien life?
If a NASA chief believes that aliens will be discovered by 2025, that is her opinion. So what? It neither confirms nor refutes the existence of alien life. It's one person's opinion.
What evidence discovered by human probes discounts the idea of alien life elsewhere in the universe?
Why are you so fixated on grouping scientists into either atheist scientists or creation scientists?
You clearly don't get it and thus have no credibility. This is sad for one because there are many weak-minded people like you who believe in fake science and fairy tales. It is sad and pathetic and at the same time laughable
There is a time limit because aliens have been long overdue and NASA head honcho has claimed it.
For one, you do not understand the fine tuning facts. Even the atheist scientists understand it and have moved on to multiverses as the explanation. The trouble is there is no observational data or experiment to base their beliefs on.
There is no evidence of aliens whatsoever from the probes. The groups and people who do have credibility in this field -- Enrico Fermi, Frank Drake, SETI, Elon Musk and more have said intelligent aliens would have contacted us already. Also, we would have found a microbe or some basic type of life elsewhere. There have been more than enough probes sent out as I have stated. Thus, you do not understand the Drake equation and Fermi paradox and what it means. This has been explained to you in the past and yet you continue to ask and repeat the same boring questions.
Even after this, the intelligent people like myself and the creation scientists are subjected to ramblings by the leftist head of NASA that due to their superior technology aliens will be found. The technology is paid for by out tax dollars, that they will find a microbe and more. It's based on false hope such as water on Mars and false science. Thus, it's better to spend our money on something better like better space stations and to see if we can set up a supply station for them on the moon. Maybe we can set up a defense system there to prevent large asteroids from hitting our planet.
Finally, to answer your last question, it's the creation scientists who are left out. These are the people with the real observational science that there are no aliens. Why not believe them and spend our tax dollars on real science projects.
Back to this?
Neither the Drake Equation nor the Fermi Paradox are any sort of definitive formula proving the non-existence of intelligent alien life.
How far into the universe do you think humanity has sent probes? If you didn't realize it, we've barely gotten anything outside of the solar system, and that is an almost infinitesimally small portion of the universe as far as we can tell.
I didn't ask you anything about people being left out of something. I asked why you group scientists as either atheist or creation scientists.
You seem to have an over-inflated idea of just how much humanity has gotten direct, close-up observational data about.
I didn't think you were one to be able to connect the dots and figure it our for yourself. Drake and Fermi provided solid scientific method for estimating intelligent alien life. However, we find through Fermi's calculations that where is everybody? Thus, the thinking today from the time of Carl Sagan (who also believed in aliens and wasted taxpayer dollars sending a time capsule up into space) is that life is indeed rare in the universe. This is evolutionary thinking.
>>How far into the universe do you think humanity has sent probes? If you didn't realize it, we've barely gotten anything outside of the solar system, and that is an almost infinitesimally small portion of the universe as far as we can tell.<<
This is a perfect example of you not being to use fine tuning facts and Drake and Fermi's work to come up with valid scientific theory. There has been more than enough probes sent to discover life in outer space. We haven't found one microbe. Even NASA head honcho thinks we'll find evidence of alien life by 2025. She can't put the evidence together either, but is basing it on her own biases and faith in very expensive technology and telescopes. Instead, we should be spending the money elsewhere.
To the contrary, I understand scientific probability and calculations just fine. Unlike you, I am not influence by emotional reactions to solid scientific evidence that go counter to my worldview.
Why is there a time limit on discovering alien life?
If a NASA chief believes that aliens will be discovered by 2025, that is her opinion. So what? It neither confirms nor refutes the existence of alien life. It's one person's opinion.
What evidence discovered by human probes discounts the idea of alien life elsewhere in the universe?
Why are you so fixated on grouping scientists into either atheist scientists or creation scientists?
You clearly don't get it and thus have no credibility. This is sad for one because there are many weak-minded people like you who believe in fake science and fairy tales. It is sad and pathetic and at the same time laughable
There is a time limit because aliens have been long overdue and NASA head honcho has claimed it.
For one, you do not understand the fine tuning facts. Even the atheist scientists understand it and have moved on to multiverses as the explanation. The trouble is there is no observational data or experiment to base their beliefs on.
There is no evidence of aliens whatsoever from the probes. The groups and people who do have credibility in this field -- Enrico Fermi, Frank Drake, SETI, Elon Musk and more have said intelligent aliens would have contacted us already. Also, we would have found a microbe or some basic type of life elsewhere. There have been more than enough probes sent out as I have stated. Thus, you do not understand the Drake equation and Fermi paradox and what it means. This has been explained to you in the past and yet you continue to ask and repeat the same boring questions.
Even after this, the intelligent people like myself and the creation scientists are subjected to ramblings by the leftist head of NASA that due to their superior technology aliens will be found. The technology is paid for by out tax dollars, that they will find a microbe and more. It's based on false hope such as water on Mars and false science. Thus, it's better to spend our money on something better like better space stations and to see if we can set up a supply station for them on the moon. Maybe we can set up a defense system there to prevent large asteroids from hitting our planet.
Finally, to answer your last question, it's the creation scientists who are left out. These are the people with the real observational science that there are no aliens. Why not believe them and spend our tax dollars on real science projects.
Back to this?
Neither the Drake Equation nor the Fermi Paradox are any sort of definitive formula proving the non-existence of intelligent alien life.
How far into the universe do you think humanity has sent probes? If you didn't realize it, we've barely gotten anything outside of the solar system, and that is an almost infinitesimally small portion of the universe as far as we can tell.
I didn't ask you anything about people being left out of something. I asked why you group scientists as either atheist or creation scientists.
You seem to have an over-inflated idea of just how much humanity has gotten direct, close-up observational data about.
I didn't think you were one to be able to connect the dots and figure it our for yourself. Drake and Fermi provided solid scientific method for estimating intelligent alien life. However, we find through Fermi's calculations that where is everybody? Thus, the thinking today from the time of Carl Sagan (who also believed in aliens and wasted taxpayer dollars sending a time capsule up into space) is that life is indeed rare in the universe. This is evolutionary thinking.
>>How far into the universe do you think humanity has sent probes? If you didn't realize it, we've barely gotten anything outside of the solar system, and that is an almost infinitesimally small portion of the universe as far as we can tell.<<
This is a perfect example of you not being to use fine tuning facts and Drake and Fermi's work to come up with valid scientific theory. There has been more than enough probes sent to discover life in outer space. We haven't found one microbe. Even NASA head honcho thinks we'll find evidence of alien life by 2025. She can't put the evidence together either, but is basing it on her own biases and faith in very expensive technology and telescopes. Instead, we should be spending the money elsewhere.
To the contrary, I understand scientific probability and calculations just fine. Unlike you, I am not influence by emotional reactions to solid scientific evidence that go counter to my worldview.
You clearly have no idea how vast the universe is if you think "there has been more than enough probes sent to discover life in outer space." That statement might be true if you assume life should be found in a very few places in our solar system, but otherwise it is ridiculous. The universe could be teeming with life without humanity knowing it, because we have not been able to directly observe 99.9999999% of the universe. You might want to get an idea of the scale of the universe before you declare that the probes sent by humanity should have discovered life.
I am familiar with the Drake Equation and Fermi's Paradox. Neither is a scientific theory. Neither is testable. They are at best hypotheses without the ability to test. You may have decided they are gospel truth, but that's your opinion.
Why is there a time limit on discovering alien life?
If a NASA chief believes that aliens will be discovered by 2025, that is her opinion. So what? It neither confirms nor refutes the existence of alien life. It's one person's opinion.
What evidence discovered by human probes discounts the idea of alien life elsewhere in the universe?
Why are you so fixated on grouping scientists into either atheist scientists or creation scientists?
You clearly don't get it and thus have no credibility. This is sad for one because there are many weak-minded people like you who believe in fake science and fairy tales. It is sad and pathetic and at the same time laughable
There is a time limit because aliens have been long overdue and NASA head honcho has claimed it.
For one, you do not understand the fine tuning facts. Even the atheist scientists understand it and have moved on to multiverses as the explanation. The trouble is there is no observational data or experiment to base their beliefs on.
There is no evidence of aliens whatsoever from the probes. The groups and people who do have credibility in this field -- Enrico Fermi, Frank Drake, SETI, Elon Musk and more have said intelligent aliens would have contacted us already. Also, we would have found a microbe or some basic type of life elsewhere. There have been more than enough probes sent out as I have stated. Thus, you do not understand the Drake equation and Fermi paradox and what it means. This has been explained to you in the past and yet you continue to ask and repeat the same boring questions.
Even after this, the intelligent people like myself and the creation scientists are subjected to ramblings by the leftist head of NASA that due to their superior technology aliens will be found. The technology is paid for by out tax dollars, that they will find a microbe and more. It's based on false hope such as water on Mars and false science. Thus, it's better to spend our money on something better like better space stations and to see if we can set up a supply station for them on the moon. Maybe we can set up a defense system there to prevent large asteroids from hitting our planet.
Finally, to answer your last question, it's the creation scientists who are left out. These are the people with the real observational science that there are no aliens. Why not believe them and spend our tax dollars on real science projects.
Back to this?
Neither the Drake Equation nor the Fermi Paradox are any sort of definitive formula proving the non-existence of intelligent alien life.
How far into the universe do you think humanity has sent probes? If you didn't realize it, we've barely gotten anything outside of the solar system, and that is an almost infinitesimally small portion of the universe as far as we can tell.
I didn't ask you anything about people being left out of something. I asked why you group scientists as either atheist or creation scientists.
You seem to have an over-inflated idea of just how much humanity has gotten direct, close-up observational data about.
I didn't think you were one to be able to connect the dots and figure it our for yourself. Drake and Fermi provided solid scientific method for estimating intelligent alien life. However, we find through Fermi's calculations that where is everybody? Thus, the thinking today from the time of Carl Sagan (who also believed in aliens and wasted taxpayer dollars sending a time capsule up into space) is that life is indeed rare in the universe. This is evolutionary thinking.
>>How far into the universe do you think humanity has sent probes? If you didn't realize it, we've barely gotten anything outside of the solar system, and that is an almost infinitesimally small portion of the universe as far as we can tell.<<
This is a perfect example of you not being to use fine tuning facts and Drake and Fermi's work to come up with valid scientific theory. There has been more than enough probes sent to discover life in outer space. We haven't found one microbe. Even NASA head honcho thinks we'll find evidence of alien life by 2025. She can't put the evidence together either, but is basing it on her own biases and faith in very expensive technology and telescopes. Instead, we should be spending the money elsewhere.
To the contrary, I understand scientific probability and calculations just fine. Unlike you, I am not influence by emotional reactions to solid scientific evidence that go counter to my worldview.
You clearly have no idea how vast the universe is if you think "there has been more than enough probes sent to discover life in outer space." That statement might be true if you assume life should be found in a very few places in our solar system, but otherwise it is ridiculous. The universe could be teeming with life without humanity knowing it, because we have not been able to directly observe 99.9999999% of the universe. You might want to get an idea of the scale of the universe before you declare that the probes sent by humanity should have discovered life.
I am familiar with the Drake Equation and Fermi's Paradox. Neither is a scientific theory. Neither is testable. They are at best hypotheses without the ability to test. You may have decided they are gospel truth, but that's your opinion.
First, you ignore the fine tuning facts.
You don't know how many probes have been sent, do you? I do. What Drake and Fermi does is put scientific focus on the existence of aliens. It's not based on an abundance of planets in the universe anymore. To the contrary, we've found that the probability they do not exist is high. In addition, you neglect to factor time. More scientists agree with me that life is rare.
Finally, you continue to struggle with real observational science as you didn't even know about SETI. They've been looking to contact aliens for years and now have to raise funds to support themselves. Not only are they putting the theory to the test, they admit that they should've found alien life by now.
I'll be moving on now. Sorry, but don't have time to waste instructing the ignorant.
there really is no point in trying to have an honest discussion with somebody like that.
