What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Why do poor communities exist in America?

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
72,316
Reaction score
4,767
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
I have good moral standing. I do have standing under the law. And I have not "hated on the poor" at any time. I am all for helping those who NEED the help. I am simply against those who CAN work but instead choose to leech off those who do work.

I have the moral cajones to work to support me and my family. I provide for myself and for those who cannot provide for themselves. I provide for others through my taxes and my charitable donations.

I do not demand to be paid from the efforts of others who work, while denigrating them by calling them fools and calling a work ethic something from the iron Age.

You are the hypocrite. You mock people who work to support themselves, while demanding that those same people support you. When you are completely capable of supporting yourself.
Just quit and go on unemployment compensation if you don't have what it takes to work and pay taxes. It really is that simple. Only hypocrites have a problem with it.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
72,316
Reaction score
4,767
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Daniel, I will ask again. I understand that you will refuse to answer. But I am still wanting a response.

In order for taxes to provide an income for those who refuse to work, the majority of the people have to work and pay taxes. I accept that some people are unable to work.

But you are able to work. So you require that others work so that you can choose to stay home and do nothing. Why do you deserve to live without having to support yourself, when you being supported requires others to work?

Why are you special enough to be "kept" by the working population?
You simply have no understanding of economics or you would have realized I have answered your alleged question every time it came up. Anyone circulating capital pays general taxes. Any questions?
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
72,316
Reaction score
4,767
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Most of us actually do Dan , fact is i'm a very self made man due to our system.

But any system can go t*ts up

Especially when it works for the few, not the many

~S~
Inequality does that. It is why solving simple poverty via existing legal and physical infrastructure like unemployment compensation in our at-will employment is important. We should have no homeless problem in our first world economy.

Solving simple poverty virtually automatically on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States can have this effect by analogy by ensuring full employment of capital resources even for the Poor:

If liberty and equality are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in government to the utmost.--Aristotle
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,730
Reaction score
2,325
Points
265
Just quit and go on unemployment compensation if you don't have what it takes to work and pay taxes. It really is that simple. Only hypocrites have a problem with it.
Wrong

All intelligent people have a problem with encouraging laziness and making working people pay for shiftless bums

Which is why an immoral and unethical dumbass like you supports such stupidity
 

WinterBorn

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
42,392
Reaction score
12,065
Points
2,190
Location
Atlanta
If you had read any history at all, you would know that unemployment compensation was "invented" by FDR's administration. Black codes were still in effect back then. And, our understanding of economics was less than it is now.

What part of employment at the will of either party is so difficult to understand?

I understand it very well.

I also understand that your insistence that the simplest words of the employment law describing the employee/employer relationship do not rule every facet of public law.
 

WinterBorn

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
42,392
Reaction score
12,065
Points
2,190
Location
Atlanta
Why do we have a homeless problem if means testing works? Means testing should have solved that issue already.

And, corporate welfare is simply proof right-wingers don't really care about "means testing" or delivery on goals and objectives in order to qualify.

Don't be daft. Means testing does not solve poverty at all. It prevents fraud. It prevents people who are capable of supporting themselves from soaking up resources.
 

WinterBorn

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
42,392
Reaction score
12,065
Points
2,190
Location
Atlanta
Daniel, I will ask again. I understand that you will refuse to answer. But I am still wanting a response.

In order for taxes to provide an income for those who refuse to work, the majority of the people have to work and pay taxes. I accept that some people are unable to work.

But you are able to work. So you require that others work so that you can choose to stay home and do nothing. Why do you deserve to live without having to support yourself, when you being supported requires others to work?

Why are you special enough to be "kept" by the working population?


Daniel, why won't you answer this question? What makes you so special that hundreds of people have to work and pay taxes just so you can have an income without any effort or work on your part?
 

sparky

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
18,623
Reaction score
4,569
Points
280
Location
paradise
Inequality does that. It is why solving simple poverty via existing legal and physical infrastructure like unemployment compensation in our at-will employment is important. We should have no homeless problem in our first world economy.
wealth inequity then is the issue Dan

~S~
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
72,316
Reaction score
4,767
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
I understand it very well.

I also understand that your insistence that the simplest words of the employment law describing the employee/employer relationship do not rule every facet of public law.
Yes, they do for public policy purposes. There is no other definition at law regarding employment at will.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
72,316
Reaction score
4,767
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Don't be daft. Means testing does not solve poverty at all. It prevents fraud. It prevents people who are capable of supporting themselves from soaking up resources.
You are the one being obstructionist. "Hate on the Poor"? Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States can solve simple poverty and help automatically stabilize our economy.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
72,316
Reaction score
4,767
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Daniel, why won't you answer this question? What makes you so special that hundreds of people have to work and pay taxes just so you can have an income without any effort or work on your part?
lol. You have no standing to even ask that question. Just quit and collect unemployment compensation; don't be an immoral hypocrite upon the less fortunate.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$142.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top