Why do poor communities exist in America?

[danielpalos]

I do not require a work ethic for anyone other than my own employees. And my employees have always been well rewarded for theirs.

You are free to not have a work ethic. However, if you eschew a work ethic you also eschew the rewards that come with it. Demanding that you do not need a work ethic, and the turning around and demanding an income, especially when that income is taken from those who do have a work ethic, is laughably hypocritical.

Requiring a work ethic in an at-will employment State denies and disparages at-will employment law for unemployment compensation.

 

[danielpalos]

No it does not. And there is no 1st amendment purpose in this debate.

Yes, it does. Your morals don't matter only your ethics. There is no ethical reason to appeal to ignorance of at-will employment Law in our at-will employment States; especially when does not promote or provide for the general welfare.

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

 

[danielpalos]

Because they're a result of the failed parts of socialist policies. Right wing people want the individual to take responsibility, to reap what they so, to contribute to society. Left wing people what society to help them to pay for them and when they've sowed nothing, they have nothing. And countries are still paying for these failed bits of socialism, called national debt.

That only happens in right-wing fantasy. In the real world, corporate welfare is alive and well and has even paid multimillion dollar bonuses. Right-wingers prefer to "hate on the Poor" and blame them and try to criminalize poverty while blaming the Poor for system injustice right-wingers themselves create via public policies.

 

[danielpalos]

The only President I ever saw fighting corporate welfare was Donald Trump. That's why the establishment hated him so much.

lol. You confuse right-wing fantasy with the more moral, "gospel Truth".

 

[Captain Caveman]

That only happens in right-wing fantasy. In the real world, corporate welfare is alive and well and has even paid multimillion dollar bonuses. Right-wingers prefer to "hate on the Poor" and blame them and try to criminalize poverty while blaming the Poor for system injustice right-wingers themselves create via public policies.

It happened in reality, that's why you're struggling.

 

[danielpalos]

It happened in reality, that's why you're struggling.

Only if you appeal to ignorance of economics and the effect of wealth.

From 1978 to 2018, CEO compensation grew by 1,007.5% (940.3% under the options-realized measure), far outstripping S&P stock market growth (706.7%) and the wage growth of very high earners (339.2%). In contrast, wages for the typical worker grew by just 11.9%.

CEO compensation has grown 940% since 1978: Typical worker compensation has risen only 12% during that time

The latest report in EPI’s annual series analyzing current and long-term trends in CEO compensation.

www.epi.org

 

[WinterBorn]

Of course it does. It ignores at-will employment law and those privileges and immunities already established at law by the Legislative Act.

Tell me one privilege that is abridged by the current UC law. Don't launch into some bullshit speech about the 1st amendment or what the legislature can't do.

Just tell me one privilege and or immunity that is abridged.

 

[WinterBorn]

Requiring a work ethic in an at-will employment State denies and disparages at-will employment law for unemployment compensation.

The only people requiring a work ethic are employers and co-workers. That is all. And that is only to get the work done.

No one requires you to have a work ethic. Although, it is strange to seem so proud of not having one.

By the same token, no one is required to support you beyond the level of survival. You want more than that? A work ethic serves you well.

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes, it does. Your morals don't matter only your ethics. There is no ethical reason to appeal to ignorance of at-will employment Law in our at-will employment States; especially when does not promote or provide for the general welfare.

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

"Annotated Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Please point out what part of the above text of the 1st amendment applies to this argument?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Of course it does. It ignores at-will employment law and those privileges and immunities already established at law by the Legislative Act.

It does not and that is proven fact which you can only repeatedly lie about.

 

[danielpalos]

Tell me one privilege that is abridged by the current UC law. Don't launch into some bullshit speech about the 1st amendment or what the legislature can't do.

Just tell me one privilege and or immunity that is abridged.

At-will employment Law. There are no for-cause requirements for employment at-will. Requiring Cause via public policy is an abridgment of employment at-will laws.

 

[danielpalos]

The only people requiring a work ethic are employers and co-workers. That is all. And that is only to get the work done.

No one requires you to have a work ethic. Although, it is strange to seem so proud of not having one.

By the same token, no one is required to support you beyond the level of survival. You want more than that? A work ethic serves you well.

Not at all. Simply requiring Cause for unemployment compensation is an abridgment of the privileges and immunities afforded by employment at will Laws.

 

[danielpalos]

"Annotated Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Please point out what part of the above text of the 1st amendment applies to this argument?

Where are you getting your alleged work ethic from the Age of Iron?

 

[danielpalos]

It does not and that is proven fact which you can only repeatedly lie about.

Now all you need is a valid argument to substantiate your currently unsubstantiated opinion.

 

[WinterBorn]

At-will employment Law. There are no for-cause requirements for employment at-will. Requiring Cause via public policy is an abridgment of employment at-will laws.

That is not a at-will employment right that is abridged by the UC laws.

At-will employment is exactly the same as it was. There are no for-cause requirements.

Being qualified for unemployment compensation has nothing to do with at-will employment laws.


Once again, give me a at-will employment privilege that is abridged by the current UC laws.

 

[WinterBorn]

Where are you getting your alleged work ethic from the Age of Iron?

Why not answer my question? What part of the 1st amendment applies to this discussion?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Now all you need is a valid argument to substantiate your currently unsubstantiated opinion.

Which I posted and desgtroyed your stupid claims with

You lie claiming my posts are unsubstantiated they are substantiated with facts. You know this but are too much of a chiild to admit it.

All you need is an argument of any kind as opposed to proven fallacies which is all you have posted

 

[initforme]

Being the greatest nation on earth, we have a ton of work to do on fixing our infrastructure. Our health care system is flailing, and wages are and have been way behind for years. We want young people to have families, which are expensive, and then save money. It isn't feasible for many. It's no dream for the working masses anymore. And then there are those that want to gut medicare, the one thing that helps older Americans. Social security and medicare are two of the greatest things we've ever done in america.

 

[WinterBorn]

Being the greatest nation on earth, we have a ton of work to do on fixing our infrastructure. Our health care system is flailing, and wages are and have been way behind for years. We want young people to have families, which are expensive, and then save money. It isn't feasible for many. It's no dream for the working masses anymore. And then there are those that want to gut medicare, the one thing that helps older Americans. Social security and medicare are two of the greatest things we've ever done in america.

Being the greatest nation on Earth means we take care of our citizens. Not all need the help. And anyone who is capable of taking care of themselves should do so.

But you are absolutely right that we need to work on our infrastructure. We need a healthcare system that works for all. And we need to address the way the system has perpetually screwed the middle class.

 

[initforme]

The middle class has taken it on the chin since the early 80's. Reagan went all in for the corporate and wealthy. The ball hasn't stopped rolling since then.