Why do poor communities exist in America?

[danielpalos]

Numerous things you have quoted are inconsequential. Your idea has been shot down so many times and in so many ways.

You are wasting bandwidth, at best.

Projecting much with your appeals to ignorance and egotism?

 

[danielpalos]

hey dumbass, he isn't quibbling about poor or poverty. He asked you to name one place that does not have poor people. That is all. Your overuse of semantics is simply pathetic.

Go back to offering full body massages.

Your ignorance is showing, egotist.

 

[WinterBorn]

Employment is at the will of either party not your special pleading.

And nothing I have said goes against employment being at the will of either party. You simply pretend you are arguing, when you are not.

 

[danielpalos]

And nothing I have said goes against employment being at the will of either party. You simply pretend you are arguing, when you are not.

You have no actual understanding only your egotism.

 

[WinterBorn]

Projecting much with your appeals to ignorance and egotism?

Nope. Pointing out that your idea for the "new & improved" unemployment compensation has been shot down on numerous front.

If you want money, get a job.

 

[WinterBorn]

You have no actual understanding only your egotism.

I understand that you make vague accusations without evidence.

Where have I said anything that goes against "Employment is at the will of either party"? I'm betting you won't (can't?).

 

[danielpalos]

Nope. Pointing out that your idea for the "new & improved" unemployment compensation has been shot down on numerous front.

If you want money, get a job.

You only appeal to ignorance of the law. Why should anyone take You seriously?

 

[danielpalos]

I understand that you make vague accusations without evidence.

Where have I said anything that goes against "Employment is at the will of either party"? I'm betting you won't (can't?).

lol. You merely prove you have no clue and no Cause. This thread is a prime example.

 

[WinterBorn]

Your ignorance is showing, egotist.

No it is not. He asked a simple question. I had to reiterate the question because you launched off on some tangent designed to change the subject.

All he asked was for you to point out any place that has no poor. To claim anything else is the true ignorance.

If you are like this in person, I can see why you are still a virgin.

 

[WinterBorn]

lol. You merely prove you have no clue and no Cause. This thread is a prime example.

lol. You merely prove you have no clue and no Cause. This thread is a prime example.

Thanks for proving my point.

Maybe you can try again? Where have I said anything that goes against "Employment is at the will of either party"?

 

[danielpalos]

No it is not. He asked a simple question. I had to reiterate the question because you launched off on some tangent designed to change the subject.

All he asked was for you to point out any place that has no poor. To claim anything else is the true ignorance.

If you are like this in person, I can see why you are still a virgin.

Why should anyone take right-wingers seriously? All they do is lie and project and cheat in their alleged arguments.

 

[danielpalos]

Thanks for proving my point.

Maybe you can try again? Where have I said anything that goes against "Employment is at the will of either party"?

Did you forget the repugnancy of for-cause criteria so soon, like usual?

 

[WinterBorn]

Did you forget the repugnancy of for-cause criteria so soon, like usual?

I forgot nothing. I said nothing that goes against the CA law. Period. If you insist I have, show it.

 

[WinterBorn]

Why should anyone take right-wingers seriously? All they do is lie and project and cheat in their alleged arguments.

No Daniel. Just no.

Your arguments have stooped to the ridiculous.

Example: The use of "one month" in the CA definition of employment does NOT mean that one month must be the term length for everything to do with labor law or UC. It simply does not.

 

[SmokeALib]

I just want to know why. It's so unfair.

Life is unfair. I could have been poor, but I decided I wouldn't like it.

 

[danielpalos]

I forgot nothing. I said nothing that goes against the CA law. Period. If you insist I have, show it.

Did you miss the legal point?

 

[danielpalos]

No Daniel. Just no.

Your arguments have stooped to the ridiculous.

Example: The use of "one month" in the CA definition of employment does NOT mean that one month must be the term length for everything to do with labor law or UC. It simply does not.

It is your story, storyteller. I actually understand the express terms that comprise the law.

 

[danielpalos]

Life is unfair. I could have been poor, but I decided I wouldn't like it.

Thank goodness you didn't have to deal with black codes.

 

[WinterBorn]

Did you miss the legal point?

I missed where you showed that I said what you claim I said.

 

[WinterBorn]

It is your story, storyteller. I actually understand the express terms that comprise the law.

No, that is factual information.