Why Did the Democratic South Become Republican?

Democrats condemn Republican President Richard Nixon for his so-called “Southern Strategy.”
These same Democrats expressed no concern when the racially segregated South voted solidly for Democrats for over 100 years, while deriding Republicans because of the thirty-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party.

The "Southern Strategy” that began in the 1970’s was an effort by Nixon to get fair-minded people in the South to stop discriminating against blacks and vote for the more racially tolerant Republican Party. Georgia did not switch until 2004, and Louisiana was controlled by Democrats until the election of Republican Bobby Jindal, a person of color, as governor in 2007.

As the co-architect of Nixon's "Southern Strategy", Pat Buchanan provided a first-hand account of the origin and intent of that strategy in a 2002 article posted on the Internet. Buchanan wrote that Nixon declared that the Republican Party would be built on a foundation of states’ rights, human rights, small government and a strong national defense. Nixon said he would leave it to the Democratic Party to squeeze the last ounce of political juice out of the rotting fruit of racial injustice.

Nixon Started Affirmative Action Implementation

The enforcement of affirmative action began with Richard Nixon‘s 1969 Philadelphia Plan. The plan was crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher who became known as “the father of affirmative action”. It was merit-based and set the nation‘s first goals and timetables.

Affirmative action was designed to ensure "equal" opportunity for blacks. Democrats turned affirmative action into an unfair and divisive quota system they call "equity."
Nixon was also responsible for the passage of civil rights legislation in the 1970’s.

Notably, Fletcher, as president of the United Negro College Fund, coined the phrase “the mind is a terrible thing to waste.” Fletcher was also one of the original nine plaintiffs in the famous “Brown v. Topeka Board of Education”. Fletcher briefly pursued a bid for the Republican presidential nomination in 1995.

Although affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair quota system that even most blacks do not support, affirmative action was pushed by Nixon to counter the harm caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson kicked almost all blacks out of federal government jobs after he was elected in 1912.

Also, while Wilson was president and Congress was controlled by the Democrats, more discriminatory bills were introduced in Congress than ever before in our nation’s history.
View the article that was published by the editors of “The New York Times,” entitled “The Case Against Woodrow Wilson at Princeton” which acknowledges the truth about the liberals’ progressive icon, Woodrow Wilson.

 
The problem isn't that these bed wetting jabbering retards just haven't been exposed to the facts, they're DELIBERATELY IGNORANT, and it doesn't stop there.

Their modern crusade at eliminating free speech isn't to "limit disinformation", it's to prevent others from learning the truth about the democrook party, the history of leftist authoritarian mass murder and the fact that every single time collectivist government has been established the results were starvation, pandemics, widespread poverty and total societal collapse.

It doesn't even work with rats. It created a behavioral sink complete with territorial conflict, homosexuality and even mother mice ate their young in spite of an over abundance of food.


Malignant apparatchik pieces of shit like Pinheadlope, Smokin' OP, TurdCatcher, Macturd58, WrongWinger, Moonturd, plus all the rest, refuse too accept even the most remote possibility they're on the wrong side of history, the present day, the future or all that is GOOD and RIGHTEOUS. You can not "teach" people with atrophied frontal lobes anything. These fucktards do not have the capacity to think. They're nothing more than posting bots. They're parrots with enhanced vocabularies. They don't even know what a fuckin cracker is, but they will continue to demand one because someone feeds them when they do.

.


1663935249147.png
 
On November 2, 1983, Republican President Ronald Reagan signed the bill in the White House Rose Garden making the Birthday of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. a national holiday.

The bill first came up for a vote in 1979, but the Democrat-controlled US House of Representatives refused to pass the legislation.

The first national celebration of the holiday in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. took place on January 20, 1986 and is celebrated on the 3rd Monday in January. The Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal Holiday Commission with the mission of overseeing the observance of the MLK holiday was created in the bill signed by Reagan.

 
The Democratic Party Was Sued For Their 200-Year History of Racism
The roots of modern-day racism are planted firmly in the Democratic Party. Democrats first used terrorism and discriminatory laws to stop blacks from voting for Republicans.
Now Democrats use deception and discriminatory social "equity" programs that trap blacks in poverty to keep blacks from voting for Republicans.

The Democratic Party was sued for their 200-year history of racism by Rev. Wayne Perryman and the case went all the way to the US Supreme Court. Unable to lie under oath, Democrats admitted their racist past in court. A copy of the lawsuit is included in Perryman’s book “Whites, Blacks and Racist Democrats: The Untold Story of Race & Politics Within the Democratic Party from 1792-2009.”
In his book, Perryman describes how the Democratic Party became known as the "Party of White Supremacy" that fought to preserve slavery and enacted discriminatory laws to deny civil rights to blacks.
Perryman's lawsuit demanded an apology for the Democrats' history of racism based on the Democratic Party' “States Rights” claims. The Democrats admitted their racist past under oath in court, but refused to apologize because they know that they can take the black vote for granted. Democrats hired an army of lawyers and escaped being held accountable by using a legal technicality.

Democrats Should Follow The Lead of North Carolina And Apologize

The 2006 report of the Commission appointed by the Governor of North Carolina prompted the Democratic Party of North Carolina to pass a unanimous resolution in 2007 apologizing for the Democratic Party’s role in the bloody 1898 Wilmington Race Riots where dozens of black Americans were massacred.

In a letter to the North Carolina Democratic Party, North Carolina Lieutenant Governor Richard H. Moore wrote: “We can no longer ignore the fact that many of us grew up being taught a much sanitized – and inaccurate – history…. The truth is ugly.”

If we, as a nation, are to heal our racial wounds, move beyond racial divisiveness and assure economic prosperity for blacks, we must first hold the Democratic Party accountable and demand an apology for the harm that party has inflicted on black Americans.
Until the Democratic Party is held accountable for it's racism, Democrats will continue to fan the flames of racism, as they have done for over 200 years, for partisan political gain.
When Democrats are confronted about their racist past, they claim that “the parties switched sides.” It does not make sense to believe that, after Republicans spent over 150 years fighting for black civil rights and won, all of a sudden they stood up, crossed the aisle and switched sides with the Democrats. In fact, the racist Democrats declared that they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than vote for a Republican, because the Republican Party was, and still is, the party for blacks.

 
Why the Left Can’t Let Go of Racism
By Shelby Steele

Liberals sell innocence from America’s past. If bigotry is pronounced dead, the racket is over.

Is America racist? It used to be that racism meant the actual enforcement of bigotry—the routine implementation of racial inequality everywhere in public and private life. Racism was a tyranny and an oppression that dehumanized—animalized—the “other.” It was a social malignancy, yet it carried the authority of natural law, as if God himself had dispassionately ordained it.

Today Americans know that active racism is no longer the greatest barrier to black and minority advancement. Since the 1960s other pathologies, even if originally generated by racism, have supplanted it. White racism did not shoot more than 4,000 people last year in Chicago. To the contrary, America for decades now—with much genuine remorse—has been recoiling from the practice of racism and has gained a firm intolerance for what it once indulged.

But Americans don’t really trust the truth of this. It sounds too self-exonerating. Talk of “structural” and “systemic” racism conditions people to think of it as inexorable, predestined. So even if bigotry and discrimination have lost much of their menace, Americans nevertheless yearn to know whether or not we are a racist people.

A staple on cable news these days is the “racial incident,” which stands as a referendum on this question. Today there is Charlottesville. Yesterday there were the deaths of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Freddie Gray and others. Don’t they reveal an irrepressible racism in American life? At the news conferences surrounding these events there are always the Al Sharpton clones, if not the man himself, ready to spin the tale of black tragedy and white bigotry.

Such people—and the American left generally—have a hunger for racism that is almost craven. The writer Walker Percy once wrote of the “sweetness at the horrid core of bad news.” It’s hard to witness the media’s oddly exhilarated reaction to, say, the death of Trayvon Martin without applying Percy’s insight. A black boy is dead. But not all is lost. It looks like racism.
What makes racism so sweet? Today it empowers. Racism was once just racism, a terrible bigotry that people nevertheless learned to live with, if not as a necessary evil then as an inevitable one. But the civil-rights movement, along with independence movements around the world, changed that. The ’60s recast racism in the national consciousness as an incontrovertible sin, the very worst of all social evils.
Suddenly America was in moral trouble. The open acknowledgment of the nation’s racist past had destroyed its moral authority, and affirming democratic principles and the rule of law was not a sufficient response. Only a strict moral accounting could restore legitimacy.

Thus, redemption—paying off the nation’s sins—became the moral imperative of a new political and cultural liberalism. President Lyndon Johnson turned redemption into a kind of activism: the Great Society, the War on Poverty, school busing, liberalized welfare policies, affirmative action, and so on.

This liberalism always projects moral idealisms (integration, social justice, diversity, inclusion, etc.) that have the ring of redemption. What is political correctness, if not essentially redemptive speech? Soon liberalism had become a cultural identity that offered Americans a way to think of themselves as decent people. To be liberal was to be good.

Here we see redemptive liberalism’s great ingenuity: It seized proprietorship over innocence itself. It took on the power to grant or deny moral legitimacy across society. Liberals were free of the past while conservatives longed to resurrect it, bigotry and all. What else could “Make America Great Again” mean? In this way redemptive liberalism reshaped the moral culture of the entire Western world with sweeping idealisms like “diversity,” which are as common today in Europe as in America.

So today there is sweetness at the news of racism because it sets off the hunt for innocence and power. Racism and bigotry generally are the great driving engines of modern American liberalism. Even a remote hint of racism can trigger a kind of moral entrepreneurism.

The “safe spaces” for minority students on university campuses are actually redemptive spaces for white students and administrators looking for innocence and empowerment. As minorities in these spaces languish in precious self-absorption, their white classmates, high on the idea of their own wonderful “tolerance,” whistle past the very segregated areas they are barred from.

America’s moral fall in the ’60s made innocence of the past an obsession. Thus liberalism invited people to internalize innocence, to become synonymous with it—even to fight for it as they would for an ideology. But to be innocent there must be an evil from which to be free. The liberal identity must have racism, lest it lose innocence and the power it conveys.

The great problem for conservatives is that they lack the moral glibness to compete with liberalism’s “innocence.” But today there are signs of what I have called race fatigue. People are becoming openly cynical toward the left’s moral muscling with racism. Add to this liberalism’s monumental failure to come even close to realizing any of its beautiful idealisms, and the makings of a new conservative mandate become clearer. As idealism was the left’s political edge, shouldn’t realism now be the right’s? Reality as the informing vision—and no more wrestling with innocence.
 

Now Taxachusettes is a democrook shit hole.

Its dirty and nasty up there now.
 
If racial segregation is voluntary among Blacks, it is OK. Look at prisons, colleges, social settings. Blacks for their own cliques, reserve their own dorms, etc., all the time, and it's "cool." Same for Wimmin. An all-male school is misogynistic, but an all-female school is fine. Same for "Hispanics." If it is at their initiative, it is just culture-affirming, and that is cool.

Segregation by WHITES, on the other hand is invariably based on a desire to avoid contact with "others." And it really doesn't matter the purported reason for the whiteness - it's usually a lie.
 
Why Did the Democratic South Become Republican?

The south used to vote Democrat. Now it votes Republican. Why the switch? Was it, as some people say, because the GOP decided to appeal to racist whites? Carol Swain, Professor of Political Science at Vanderbilt University, explains.

TheReaper says: This great video corrects the gigantic LIE and the fake narrative of the Left about the so-called southern strategy.


The Republican Party was formed to combat Slavery and Racism. They have created and supported every Civil Rights Bill the was put before Congress since 1864, fought against Democrat groups like the KKK (Nazis before The German Nazis) and have defended equal rights for all Americans, and upheld Conservative Values.

Eventually people in The Bible Belt are going to take notice that The Republican Party stands for God and Country and Morality, while The Democrat Party has NEVER changed and is in direct opposition to Biblical Principles, Individual Liberties, and is For BIG GOVERNMENT, and treating citizens like Cattle, like Resources to be harvested and disposed of at will.

The Democrat Party is a Racist Party itself, and believes in Eugenics especially for minorities. They believe in Population Control especially for "Undesirables and Deplorables" they see as low value people. They are also Marxists and use the tools of division, especially racial division to attempt to control the population and push their agenda. They use people like pawns such as illegals, they use social engineering to poison minds against principles of virtue, to weaken the family unit, because a weak family and division makes people subject to reprogramming for their purposes. They believe in a caste system, and reject upward mobility, especially for minorities.

A better question would be, when Did The Democrat Party decide that they wanted to destroy America?

My answer is ALWAYS. Looking at History, The Democrat Party were LOYALISTS to The RED COATS, and supported King George rather than rebel against him. Being in the colonies, most of them were forced to be reluctant revolutionaries. They have always been Benedict Arnolds. Always in favor of being ruled instead of being free. Always in favor of making America look like a Socialist Monarchy instead of a Free Democratic Republic. They undermine Democracy and Freedom in favor of The State every single time without fail.

When most of the UNION wanted to Outlaw Slavery, The Democrat Party resisted it. They resisted it even at the formation of The Union when they refused to sign the first draft of The Declaration of Independence, and later The Constitution because the first draft attempted to abolish Slavery. Because of their refusal to party with Human Trafficking and Slavery, we nearly lost the Union and that only ended when The Abolishionist Republican North defeated The Slaver Democratic South. After that, some people in The South began to embrace the Victors, and reject The Politics of Oppression and Elitism The Slave Master Democrat Party sold.

The Democrat Party is near 100 years older than The Republican Party, and their ideologies are still rooted in things like Monarchies, and Imperialism.
 
Last edited:
How long did those illegals last on Martha's Vinyard? :eusa_whistle:
Not long!! It about 100,000 people that come every summer. They sent them somewhere that would be better suited for them. Its like Mackinaw Island.
 
Whose is in the south now, Republicans. The only thing is they don't wear the white clothes and they are racist as hell.
Says the racist that hates minorities if they happen to "immigrate" to Elitist strongholds like Martha's Vineyard. If you aren't trying to exterminate them in Your Nazi Planned Parenthood Extermination Camps, you try to oppress them and keep them herded in broken down Urban areas.

Anything to keep them away from your precious gated communities.

Heil Shitler, DemNazi.
 
Last edited:
Says the racist that hates minorities if they happen "immigrate" to Elitist strongholds like Martha's Vineyard. If you aren't trying to exterminate them in Your Nazi Planned Parenthood Extermination Camps, you try to oppress them and keep them herded in broken down Urban areas.

Anything to keep them away from your precious gated communities.

Heil Shitler, DemNazi.
You know we're right here right. You guys don't have to talk about us like we aren't in the room.... 😆
 
And yet it was a Democratic President (Lyndon Baines Johnson) who pushed and executed the Civil Rights Act of 1964...

Which drove Dixiecrats into the Red Zone... :21: ...understandable... they figured that the Democratic Party had "gone over to the enemy"...
Why do you motherfucking liars always point to that as the catalyst? Is it because you're a bunch of race baiting motherfucking pieces of cock sucking shit?

It was the Marxist twats who started taking over that communist party that caused people to shift.

You can fucking lie all you cock sucking want to, but that is the reality.

We don't like fucking communists.
 
Why do you motherfucking liars always point to that as the catalyst? Is it because you're a bunch of race baiting motherfucking pieces of cock sucking shit?

It was the Marxist twats who started taking over that communist party that caused people to shift.

You can fucking lie all you cock sucking want to, but that is the reality.

We don't like fucking communists.
Kondome is a real piece of work
 
Not long!! It about 100,000 people that come every summer. They sent them somewhere that would be better suited for them. Its like Mackinaw Island.
My God, the racism drips from that post like so much poison.
 
BLACK POLITICAL HISTORY: TAKE THE QUIZ:

1. What Party was founded as the anti-slavery Party and fought to free blacks from slavery? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Republican Party

2. What was the Party of Abraham Lincoln who signed the emancipation proclamation that resulted in the Juneteenth celebrations that occur in black communities today? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Republican Party

3. What Party passed the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the U. S. Constitution granting blacks freedom, citizenship, and the right to vote? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Republican Party

4. What Party passed the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1875 granting blacks protection from the Black Codes and prohibiting racial discrimination in public accommodations, and was the Party of most blacks prior to the 1960’s, including Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth and Booker T. Washington? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Republican Party

5. What was the Party of the founding fathers of the NAACP? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Republican Party

6. What was the Party of President Dwight Eisenhower who sent U.S. troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools, established the Civil Rights Commission in 1958, and appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending school segregation? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Republican Party

7. What Party, by the greatest percentage, passed the Civil Rights Acts of the 1950’s and 1960’s? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Republican Party

8. What was the Party of President Richard Nixon who instituted the first Affirmative Action program in 1969 with the Philadelphia Plan that established goals and timetables? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Republican Party

9. What is the Party of Senator Everett Dirksen who pushed through the 1964 Civil Rights Act and championed the passage of civil rights legislation in ‘57, ‘60, ‘64, ‘65 and ’68, as well as wrote the language for the 1965 Voting Rights Act and crafted the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Republican Party

10. What Party fought to keep blacks in slavery and was the Party of the Ku Klux Klan? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Democrat Party

11. What Party from 1870 to 1930 used fraud, whippings, lynching, murder, intimidation, and mutilation to get the black vote, and passed the Black Codes and Jim Crow laws which legalized racial discrimination and denied blacks their rights as citizens? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Democrat Party

12. What was the Party of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and President Harry Truman who rejected anti-lynching laws and efforts to establish a permanent Civil Rights Commission? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Democrat Party

13. What was the Party of President Lyndon Johnson, who called Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. “that [N-word] preacher” because he opposed the Viet Nam War; and President John F. Kennedy who voted against the 1957 Civil Rights law as a Senator, then as president opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. after becoming president and had the FBI investigate Dr. King on suspicion of being a communist? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Democrat Party

14. What is the Party of the late Senators Robert Byrd who was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, Ernest “Fritz” Hollings who hoisted the Confederate flag over the state capitol in South Carolina while governor, and Ted Kennedy who called black judicial nominees “Neanderthals” while blocking their appointments? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Democrat Party

15. What Party is against school vouchers and takes the black vote for granted without ever acknowledging their racist past or apologizing for trying to expand slavery, lynching blacks and passing the Black Codes and Jim Crow laws that caused great harm to blacks? The Democrat Party or the Republican Party?

ANSWER: The Democrat Party
 

Forum List

Back
Top