Why Did, And Why Do, So Many Self-Proclaimed Conservative Side w/Rush On Sandra Fluke

[RosieS]

No taxpayer was harmed in the production of this issue.

The issue being why does the RCC allow insurance to pay for BC and the office visit for the Rx for employees and not students?

Also, why does the radio pay for insurance that pays for Viagra for Rush for his Dominican Republic golf trip with 3 male golfers and no women? Does he need it to get it up for a golf buddy? Or little Dominican boys? Or both?

And what does that say about the boys....I mean men.... here who use Rush as such a great role model?

Why does insurance pay for Viagra and not pregnancy prevention? Ugly bastards like Rush talk trash about young women but need a pill to get erect? Limbaugh ought to dose his sex victims with tranquilizers, that is sorta more humane.

Regards from Rosie

 

[Pogo]

When citizen Sandra Fluke's story first hit the media the response from Rush was to INSTANTLY and IMMEDIATELY attack her. He distorted her words and message to say that she wants the government to pay for her to have sex. He went as far as suggesting that we all should watch her have sex. He literally went THAT far.

The worst part of the story isn't how disgusting that fat slob and bastard is, but that there was not ONE Republican, not one self-proclaimed Conservative, not one fundamentalist RW Christian that stood up against Rush and that reprehensible message. What we saw instead were many RWers who immediately began parroting him and that bigoted message. On this very board even...and quite recently too.

I mean, do you really agree with that? Do you REALLY believe that Sara Fluke believes in having the government pay for her to have sex? Do you side with Rush in wanting to see her have sex, since, in your minds, you are already paying for it, so you might as well be able to watch it <--- that was his reasoning by the way.

Edit: He even called the girl a slut on national radio, for at least 4 days straight...no apologies.

Has The Republican Party sunk so low?

Why?!?!??

First: you have been absolutely silent on how the left and the media treated conservative women: Sarah Palin, Condeleeza Rice, etc. They were called worse names, and in the case of Sarah Palin, the left put those terrible names on T-shirts and wore them at the convention.

As for Rush: he was mocking Sandra Fluke. He took "her words" you know how the left does this and says: he actually said those words (after carefully rearranging them), and used them to make the point that birth control = sex. If you want to explain that a woman needs birth control for any other purpose, I would like to see that explanation.

Was him saying she was a slut nasty? Yes, it was.
What do you say about a person that wants the taxpayer to pay for unhealthy practices?
Can you imagine a person coming before congress and demanding the taxpayer, pay for their cigarettes? alcohol? supersized meals?

Yet because this was a woman that was touting an issue near and dear to the left, it is suddenly wrong to mock or criticize her behavior?

I thought you guys were about "diversity" (that would include conservatives)?

"Diversity" would include conservatives, yes. It would not include libel. That's illegal.

You gave no documentation on Sarah Palin and Condi Rice, but in any case both are public political figures, whereas Sandra Fluke is a student.

I could say "nice try" here but that would be exaggerating.

 

[ArmyCowboy]

is it right to deny these reasons to patients for the sake of someone elses religious beliefs?

Furthermore, Georgetown University sponsored health insurance provides birth control for faculty and staff, just not students.

yea, why should a college pay for a students insurance or birth control?

Try to keep up here.

The college doesn't pay for the student's insurance, the student does. Fluke just wanted birth control included in Georgetown's insurance, the same thing they do for faculty and staff.

 

[ArmyCowboy]

You and the other Libs listen to Rush way more than I do, he's funny. I like how he puts out these flaming bags of pooh and you Libs fight each other to jump on them.

Rush is a talk show host. A talk show host, he's paid to express his own opinion and share his insights. Progs, being the hive-minded creatures you are have a very hard time understanding that our opinions are different from Rush's. Yours is a political movement that prides itself on its 100% homogeneous thought, how can you possible understand what it's like to listen to a talk radio host and laugh?

I don't listen to political talk radio. I find it insular, repetative and intellectually boring.

The fuck you don't. Why do you care what Rush said or thinks?

I find the hero worship you guys have for him fascinating.

 

[logical4u]

When citizen Sandra Fluke's story first hit the media the response from Rush was to INSTANTLY and IMMEDIATELY attack her. He distorted her words and message to say that she wants the government to pay for her to have sex. He went as far as suggesting that we all should watch her have sex. He literally went THAT far.

The worst part of the story isn't how disgusting that fat slob and bastard is, but that there was not ONE Republican, not one self-proclaimed Conservative, not one fundamentalist RW Christian that stood up against Rush and that reprehensible message. What we saw instead were many RWers who immediately began parroting him and that bigoted message. On this very board even...and quite recently too.

I mean, do you really agree with that? Do you REALLY believe that Sara Fluke believes in having the government pay for her to have sex? Do you side with Rush in wanting to see her have sex, since, in your minds, you are already paying for it, so you might as well be able to watch it <--- that was his reasoning by the way.

Edit: He even called the girl a slut on national radio, for at least 4 days straight...no apologies.

Has The Republican Party sunk so low?

Why?!?!??

First: you have been absolutely silent on how the left and the media treated conservative women: Sarah Palin, Condeleeza Rice, etc. They were called worse names, and in the case of Sarah Palin, the left put those terrible names on T-shirts and wore them at the convention.

As for Rush: he was mocking Sandra Fluke. He took "her words" you know how the left does this and says: he actually said those words (after carefully rearranging them), and used them to make the point that birth control = sex. If you want to explain that a woman needs birth control for any other purpose, I would like to see that explanation.

Was him saying she was a slut nasty? Yes, it was.
What do you say about a person that wants the taxpayer to pay for unhealthy practices?
Can you imagine a person coming before congress and demanding the taxpayer, pay for their cigarettes? alcohol? supersized meals?

Yet because this was a woman that was touting an issue near and dear to the left, it is suddenly wrong to mock or criticize her behavior?

I thought you guys were about "diversity" (that would include conservatives)?

"Diversity" would include conservatives, yes. It would not include libel. That's illegal.

You gave no documentation on Sarah Palin and Condi Rice, but in any case both are public political figures, whereas Sandra Fluke is a student.

I could say "nice try" here but that would be exaggerating.

Sandra Fluke made herself into a "public figure" by appearing in front of congress to beg for the taxpayer to pay for prevention of consequences of having sex.

Again, he was making fun (it is ok when Letterman says stuff about Palin's daughters). If you are unaware of the left slamming conservative women you are intellectually dishonest. Google it.

BTW, Rush was "linguistically" correct if Sandra Fluke has had multiple sex partners in her life. I know it is not "politically correct" in the "diverse" culture of corruption, but, do not worry, when Obama care is in full control of your health care, that type of behavior will be taxed (because it causes health problems). Along with many other destructive behaviors, the health Czar will be telling you who you can partner with, what you can eat, what you can drink (and how much), how often you should exercise (and since the taxpayer is paying for it, they will have gov't reps verify you are doing things their way, since it "could save one life"). Go ahead, embrace corruption, and make a nation of wimps, our enemies are gathering, and when war comes, you will be the first to step up to fight, yes?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I don't listen to political talk radio. I find it insular, repetative and intellectually boring.

The fuck you don't. Why do you care what Rush said or thinks?

I find the hero worship you guys have for him fascinating.

You keep projecting your Obama Messiah fantasies onto the rest of us

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Furthermore, Georgetown University sponsored health insurance provides birth control for faculty and staff, just not students.

yea, why should a college pay for a students insurance or birth control?

Try to keep up here.

The college doesn't pay for the student's insurance, the student does. Fluke just wanted birth control included in Georgetown's insurance, the same thing they do for faculty and staff.

Why? Because a box of Trojans is so prohibitively expensive that you need insurance to pay for it?

 

[ArmyCowboy]

The fuck you don't. Why do you care what Rush said or thinks?

I find the hero worship you guys have for him fascinating.

You keep projecting your Obama Messiah fantasies onto the rest of us

Funny, when given the chance to vote for Obama, I voted for Gary Johnson.

Now what were saying about projections there, smart one?

 

[ArmyCowboy]

yea, why should a college pay for a students insurance or birth control?

Try to keep up here.

The college doesn't pay for the student's insurance, the student does. Fluke just wanted birth control included in Georgetown's insurance, the same thing they do for faculty and staff.

Why? Because a box of Trojans is so prohibitively expensive that you need insurance to pay for it?

If you rely exclusively on condoms for birth control, you're not very smart.

 

[Spoonman]

I don't listen to political talk radio. I find it insular, repetative and intellectually boring.

The fuck you don't. Why do you care what Rush said or thinks?

I find the hero worship you guys have for him fascinating.

I find the hero worship you have for yourself fascinating

 

[ArmyCowboy]

The fuck you don't. Why do you care what Rush said or thinks?

I find the hero worship you guys have for him fascinating.

I find the hero worship you have for yourself fascinating

I suppose you felt you must reply in order to try and save face, but this is really the best retort you could make?

Disappointing.

 

[Spoonman]

I find the hero worship you guys have for him fascinating.

I find the hero worship you have for yourself fascinating

I suppose you felt you must reply in order to try and save face, but this is really the best retort you could make?

Disappointing.

consider the value of the retort worthy of the recipient of the retort

 

[ArmyCowboy]

I find the hero worship you have for yourself fascinating

I suppose you felt you must reply in order to try and save face, but this is really the best retort you could make?

Disappointing.

consider the value of the retort worthy of the recipient of the retort

I've found that to be a version of the standard statement someone makes when they've posted something incredibly stupid and are trying to back peddle.

 

[Spoonman]

I suppose you felt you must reply in order to try and save face, but this is really the best retort you could make?

Disappointing.

consider the value of the retort worthy of the recipient of the retort

I've found that to be a version of the standard statement someone makes when they've posted something incredibly stupid and are trying to back peddle.

like your last two posts? got it

 

[Rozman]

Birth control is a hot button issue, and Sandra Fluke distorted her story to fit the democratic agenda. While I think Rush is an idiot, who clearly doesn't understand how birth control works, and a pig, for calling her a slut, I can also understand why she didnt garner much sympathy from the right.

Thanks for reminding me that he called her slut on the radio for about 4 days straight.

Now, how did she "distort her story to fit the Democratic agenda?" I don't quite get that one. Break it down for me if you can.

Thanks.

Edit: Also, seems like you're giving support to Rush and condoning his behavior. Phrases like "I can see why..." tends to signify support.

Seems like Bill Maher can say whatever the fuck he feels like saying and you guys laugh your asses off....

I told you before...Rush's pimp hand is strong.

 

[JoeB131]

This was never an economic issue. The Insurance companies are THRILLED to pay for birth control, guy. Since birth control costs $300.00 and a live birth costs $10,000, it's a no-brainer. That's why the insurance industry didn't squeak about this provision of the ACA. So please don't give me the "self-reliance" crap.

This was about a bunch of religious people trying to impose their superstitions on others.

Jesus H. Christ, are you fucking stupid or what?

Yeah, we don't want any of that self-reliance crap. We need to become a country of people who abdicate all of their personal responsibilities to some third party bureaucracy to make all of our decisions for us. Why that's a recipe for success if I've ever heard one.

Jesus H. Chris, Forrest, are you really that fucking stupid or what??

It isn't an issue of self-reliance guy.

The only people making medical decisions should be the patient and her doctor. PERIOD. Not some guy in a dress who decides that because he decided to give up sex for life because a Invisible Sky Pixie told him to, everyone else needs to, too.

Point is, Fluke paid for health insurance as part of her tuition. She should get whatever sensible health care she wants, not just those some guy who believes in a magic sky man thinks she should have.

 

[JoeB131]

[

It's not, or despite, that he's that stupid. It's that he hates religion that much.
Invisible Sky Pixie? Really, Joe. Are you Cammmpbell's 7 year old son?

If you substitute the words "Invisible Sky Pixie" for "God" in any sentence, the absurdity of it becomes apparent.

 

[Pogo]

First: you have been absolutely silent on how the left and the media treated conservative women: Sarah Palin, Condeleeza Rice, etc. They were called worse names, and in the case of Sarah Palin, the left put those terrible names on T-shirts and wore them at the convention.

As for Rush: he was mocking Sandra Fluke. He took "her words" you know how the left does this and says: he actually said those words (after carefully rearranging them), and used them to make the point that birth control = sex. If you want to explain that a woman needs birth control for any other purpose, I would like to see that explanation.

Was him saying she was a slut nasty? Yes, it was.
What do you say about a person that wants the taxpayer to pay for unhealthy practices?
Can you imagine a person coming before congress and demanding the taxpayer, pay for their cigarettes? alcohol? supersized meals?

Yet because this was a woman that was touting an issue near and dear to the left, it is suddenly wrong to mock or criticize her behavior?

I thought you guys were about "diversity" (that would include conservatives)?

"Diversity" would include conservatives, yes. It would not include libel. That's illegal.

You gave no documentation on Sarah Palin and Condi Rice, but in any case both are public political figures, whereas Sandra Fluke is a student.

I could say "nice try" here but that would be exaggerating.

Sandra Fluke made herself into a "public figure" by appearing in front of congress to beg for the taxpayer to pay for prevention of consequences of having sex.

Again, he was making fun (it is ok when Letterman says stuff about Palin's daughters). If you are unaware of the left slamming conservative women you are intellectually dishonest. Google it.

BTW, Rush was "linguistically" correct if Sandra Fluke has had multiple sex partners in her life. I know it is not "politically correct" in the "diverse" culture of corruption, but, do not worry, when Obama care is in full control of your health care, that type of behavior will be taxed (because it causes health problems). Along with many other destructive behaviors, the health Czar will be telling you who you can partner with, what you can eat, what you can drink (and how much), how often you should exercise (and since the taxpayer is paying for it, they will have gov't reps verify you are doing things their way, since it "could save one life"). Go ahead, embrace corruption, and make a nation of wimps, our enemies are gathering, and when war comes, you will be the first to step up to fight, yes?

Pathetically wrong on all counts.
A citizen testifying before a Congressional committee is not a "public figure". A citizen running for office or holding a cabinet position is. You're entitled to your own opinion, not your own language.

Second, you're a rhetorical pissant if you expect other people to do your research for you. It's not my point, so I don't have to Google jack shit. You do. When you make a point, you provide the examples -- not me. Get off your lazy ass and do your homework and then we'll talk. And when you do, if you do, you'll still have a red herring, since the topic is Lash Rimjob, not "the left and the media" --- nor is that conglomeration a legitimate comparator.

On the one example you did reference (sort of), if you're seriously proposing to compare a standup comic joke to a political talk show bloviator, then you're in more trouble than you think.

Third, you don't have the vaguest idea of Sandra Fluke's life history, so that entire paragraph is a non sequitur. You don't get to just make up your own fantasies. See #2. Again.

You guys that come in here unprepared and then think you can just wing it kill me.

 

[RosieS]

"Diversity" would include conservatives, yes. It would not include libel. That's illegal.

You gave no documentation on Sarah Palin and Condi Rice, but in any case both are public political figures, whereas Sandra Fluke is a student.

I could say "nice try" here but that would be exaggerating.

Sandra Fluke made herself into a "public figure" by appearing in front of congress to beg for the taxpayer to pay for prevention of consequences of having sex.

Again, he was making fun (it is ok when Letterman says stuff about Palin's daughters). If you are unaware of the left slamming conservative women you are intellectually dishonest. Google it.

BTW, Rush was "linguistically" correct if Sandra Fluke has had multiple sex partners in her life. I know it is not "politically correct" in the "diverse" culture of corruption, but, do not worry, when Obama care is in full control of your health care, that type of behavior will be taxed (because it causes health problems). Along with many other destructive behaviors, the health Czar will be telling you who you can partner with, what you can eat, what you can drink (and how much), how often you should exercise (and since the taxpayer is paying for it, they will have gov't reps verify you are doing things their way, since it "could save one life"). Go ahead, embrace corruption, and make a nation of wimps, our enemies are gathering, and when war comes, you will be the first to step up to fight, yes?

Pathetically wrong on all counts.
A citizen testifying before a Congressional committee is not a "public figure". A citizen running for office or holding a cabinet position is. You're entitled to your own opinion, not your own language.

Second, you're a rhetorical pissant if you expect other people to do your research for you. It's not my point, so I don't have to Google jack shit. You do. When you make a point, you provide the examples -- not me. Get off your lazy ass and do your homework and then we'll talk. And when you do, if you do, you'll still have a red herring, since the topic is Lash Rimjob, not "the left and the media" --- nor is that conglomeration a legitimate comparator.

On the one example you did reference (sort of), if you're seriously proposing to compare a standup comic joke to a political talk show bloviator, then you're in more trouble than you think.

Third, you don't have the vaguest idea of Sandra Fluke's life history, so that entire paragraph is a non sequitur. You don't get to just make up your own fantasies. See #2. Again.

You guys that come in here unprepared and then think you can just wing it kill me.

Oh, SNAP! Reply perfection.

Pick your ass up, Logical. You aren't supposed to drop it when it is handed to you.

Regards from Rosie

 

[Stephanie]

Fluke wasn't a slut, she's too ugly for that

she's more like a whore...she lets politicians pimp her out for her ranting and ravings

she was a real JOKE..some poor little rich (30 year old) college student whining in front of the country about having to pay for here own birth control

now since I'm a woman I can make these judgments..LOL