Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be the list Wesley told us about in 2003 when his book was about to hit the stores:
"In Clark's book, Winning Modern Wars, published in 2003, he describes his conversation with a military officer in the Pentagon shortly after 9/11 regarding a plan to attack seven Middle Eastern countries in five years: 'As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat. Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said. But there was more. This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.'" [147]
Wesley Clark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and he looks like to the ass he is. He got 1 out of 7 and the 1 when it was obvious we had issues with saddam....brilliant
![]()
is there a statute of limitation on what he heard ?

The answer is simple: China, Russia, the U.S. it's lackeys are fighting over Eurasia. Can't get there without the big prize Iran. Bombing the shit out of Syria and supporting terrorists to achieve that goal is much easier than going straight at Iran. That's all it is.
The road to Tehran runs through Damascus.
BTW, Iran and Syria have a mutual defense pact signed in 2005. Therefore, bombing the stuffing out of SYRIA will be easy, but the ensuing consequences will lead to going straight at Iran, which will be much, much harder.
and he looks like to the ass he is. He got 1 out of 7 and the 1 when it was obvious we had issues with saddam....brilliant
![]()
is there a statute of limitation on what he heard ?
ole Wesley is a self serving opportunist almost on par with old colon, I mean colin powell.
he was is/was anti gop era ( but not until he didn't get a call back from rove to kiss his ring) , and his riff was applicable then , BUT heres the thing, bush by virtue of soft power and careful if even to some extent subservient political machinations ( ala the lockerbie settlments gig) maneuvered Qaddafi into giving up his pursuit of a nuclear weapon. so clarkes prophecy is pure 100% unadulterated BS. So really, he was 1 for 7....![]()
Samantha Power, wife or maybe former wife of Cass Sunstein from Barry's good old days at Harvard.
which in my mind is now at the heart of the matter. Are we going to launch missles to save face because no one is going to buy the "gas" story anymore.
If the administration can find a way to avoid doing anything they will take it.
hey---they repositioned ships already---look out Assad !

Sixty-eight years after WWII, the Euros are back on their feet again, in most respects...
And they've been living under the American Umbrella for most of that time, investing in infrastructure for themselves, while we've been beating our plowshares into swords...
It's our turn to take a break, and their turn to pick up the slack...
Syria is in the Euros' back yard...
Let the Euros handle this one, if they want...
Hell, turn the Israelis loose on 'em, for all I care...
Otherwise, with respect to the Syrians...
**** 'em... let 'em rot... let 'em slaughter each other from now 'til the end of time.
Not our problem.
Unless the Rooskies and Iranians jump-in with both feet.
bush by virtue of soft power and careful if even to some extent subservient political machinations ( ala the lockerbie settlments gig) maneuvered Qaddafi into giving up his pursuit of a nuclear weapon.
Except Iraq wasn't obvious to the vast majority of Americans in November 2001.That would be the list Wesley told us about in 2003 when his book was about to hit the stores:Doubt it. Syria is on the list. Has nothing to do with Assad.
"In Clark's book, Winning Modern Wars, published in 2003, he describes his conversation with a military officer in the Pentagon shortly after 9/11 regarding a plan to attack seven Middle Eastern countries in five years: 'As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat. Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said. But there was more. This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.'" [147]
Wesley Clark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and he looks like to the ass he is. He got 2 out of 7 and the 1 when it was obvious we had issues with saddam and the other a decade later....brilliant
![]()
The answer is simple: China, Russia, the U.S. it's lackeys are fighting over Eurasia. Can't get there without the big prize Iran. Bombing the shit out of Syria and supporting terrorists to achieve that goal is much easier than going straight at Iran. That's all it is.
70 years and counting, this comes as news![]()