Why Are Women More Liberal Than Men?

[Iceman]

January 24, 2014 by CH


It’s hardly a secret that women vote more liberal and Democrat than do men. Even married women, while voting less liberal than their unmarried cohort, retain the sex disparity in vote preference. A study has found that suffrage moved the country inexorably to the left, and it hasn’t stopped moving in the degenerate direction since.

CH proposed a biological mechanism that follows from an understanding of the sexual market to explain the greater liberalism of women. As the resource-exploiting sex, women are neurally charged to extract support and transfer provisions from men to themselves to see them through the tough times of pregnancy and the raising of small children. To aid them in this purpose, women have evolved an innate (if subtly shifting) warmth for men who can provide for them and who show it through romantic displays of fidelity.

But when women become self-supporting, either by their own financial independence or via government largesse (which is in practice the redistribution of beta male resources to women), then the limbic impulses that help them connect with beta providers become short-circuited and redirected to charming cads and government growth. The cad serves the pile driver need while the sugar daddio big government serves the provider need. Under this arrangement, women can indeed “have it all”, (except for long-term commitment from men, which loses its incentive structure in this beta-bypass system).

Therefore, the liberalism of women is as much a consequence of their reliance on government serving as husband substitute as of their inherently greater sensitivity to perceived inequality or rifts in community cohesion. This theory gains traction by the evidence that married women become less liberal, ostensibly because their provider needs are being met by a real husband and the government has assumed the role of a malevolent outsider ransacking their intact family for tax money to be distributed to other women and their children.

All’s fair in souls and shivs, but this may be only part of the story of women’s infantile harm-based liberalism. The political and economic liberalism of women coexists with a greater female tendency to collectivism and religious feeling. Oddly, women appear to be both more liberal and more conservative than men, at least when the metrics used for comparison are sliced thinner. (And the hamster went wheeee….)

Read more here: Why Are Women More Liberal Than Men? | Chateau Heartiste

 

[Publius1787]

For the same reason that liberal men are mostly made up of beta males.

 

[ScienceRocks]

They have to raise the children no matter what. So they want a strong safety net with things like birth control, abortion, wic, food stamps and public schooling to make easier.

Men these days can just jump ship.

 

[AquaAthena]

January 24, 2014 by CH


It’s hardly a secret that women vote more liberal and Democrat than do men. Even married women, while voting less liberal than their unmarried cohort, retain the sex disparity in vote preference. A study has found that suffrage moved the country inexorably to the left, and it hasn’t stopped moving in the degenerate direction since.

CH proposed a biological mechanism that follows from an understanding of the sexual market to explain the greater liberalism of women. As the resource-exploiting sex, women are neurally charged to extract support and transfer provisions from men to themselves to see them through the tough times of pregnancy and the raising of small children. To aid them in this purpose, women have evolved an innate (if subtly shifting) warmth for men who can provide for them and who show it through romantic displays of fidelity.

But when women become self-supporting, either by their own financial independence or via government largesse (which is in practice the redistribution of beta male resources to women), then the limbic impulses that help them connect with beta providers become short-circuited and redirected to charming cads and government growth. The cad serves the pile driver need while the sugar daddio big government serves the provider need. Under this arrangement, women can indeed “have it all”, (except for long-term commitment from men, which loses its incentive structure in this beta-bypass system).

Therefore, the liberalism of women is as much a consequence of their reliance on government serving as husband substitute as of their inherently greater sensitivity to perceived inequality or rifts in community cohesion. This theory gains traction by the evidence that married women become less liberal, ostensibly because their provider needs are being met by a real husband and the government has assumed the role of a malevolent outsider ransacking their intact family for tax money to be distributed to other women and their children.

All’s fair in souls and shivs, but this may be only part of the story of women’s infantile harm-based liberalism. The political and economic liberalism of women coexists with a greater female tendency to collectivism and religious feeling. Oddly, women appear to be both more liberal and more conservative than men, at least when the metrics used for comparison are sliced thinner. (And the hamster went wheeee….)

Read more here: Why Are Women More Liberal Than Men? | Chateau Heartiste

It's largely a touchy-feeling emotional reactionary thing. Rescuers for the most part. Save the world...yeah right. I want a Margaret Thatcher type.....

 

[Leweman]

They have to raise the children no matter what. So they want a strong safety net with things like birth control, abortion, wic, food stamps and public schooling to make easier.

Men these days can just jump ship.

abortion?

 

[Billy000]

January 24, 2014 by CH


It’s hardly a secret that women vote more liberal and Democrat than do men. Even married women, while voting less liberal than their unmarried cohort, retain the sex disparity in vote preference. A study has found that suffrage moved the country inexorably to the left, and it hasn’t stopped moving in the degenerate direction since.

CH proposed a biological mechanism that follows from an understanding of the sexual market to explain the greater liberalism of women. As the resource-exploiting sex, women are neurally charged to extract support and transfer provisions from men to themselves to see them through the tough times of pregnancy and the raising of small children. To aid them in this purpose, women have evolved an innate (if subtly shifting) warmth for men who can provide for them and who show it through romantic displays of fidelity.

But when women become self-supporting, either by their own financial independence or via government largesse (which is in practice the redistribution of beta male resources to women), then the limbic impulses that help them connect with beta providers become short-circuited and redirected to charming cads and government growth. The cad serves the pile driver need while the sugar daddio big government serves the provider need. Under this arrangement, women can indeed “have it all”, (except for long-term commitment from men, which loses its incentive structure in this beta-bypass system).

Therefore, the liberalism of women is as much a consequence of their reliance on government serving as husband substitute as of their inherently greater sensitivity to perceived inequality or rifts in community cohesion. This theory gains traction by the evidence that married women become less liberal, ostensibly because their provider needs are being met by a real husband and the government has assumed the role of a malevolent outsider ransacking their intact family for tax money to be distributed to other women and their children.

All’s fair in souls and shivs, but this may be only part of the story of women’s infantile harm-based liberalism. The political and economic liberalism of women coexists with a greater female tendency to collectivism and religious feeling. Oddly, women appear to be both more liberal and more conservative than men, at least when the metrics used for comparison are sliced thinner. (And the hamster went wheeee….)

Read more here: Why Are Women More Liberal Than Men? | Chateau Heartiste

Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives | Psychology Today

Are Liberals Smarter? Study Indicates The Answer Is Yes -

Liberals and atheists smarter? Intelligent people have values novel in human evolutionary history, study finds

 

[ScienceRocks]

I am talking to the dead beat dads within all communities. You suck!

 

[Mac1958]

.

Liberals are more animated by their maternal side ("here, let me take care of you").

Conservatives are more animated by their paternal side ("pull yourself up by your bootstraps").

Which is why balance is good.

.

 

[Duped]

They think with their hearts instead of their heads.

 

[ScienceRocks]

They want public school to send children too
They want the college paid for
They want the food stamps for tough times

This is why

 

[Papawx3]

I think it's because women think on a different level than men. Most men think on a basis of logic and most women feel by emotion. It's only natural then that when the women meet matters of compassion they are naturally the first to equate to that compassion, their feelings take over, and then nature takes it's course. Before you know it, any woman who doesn't think things through is arguing for those things she sees as 'compassionate'.

Fwiw, I haven't met a woman yet who could think her way out of a paper bag.

 

[KNB]

.

Liberals are more animated by their maternal side ("here, let me take care of you").

Conservatives are more animated by their paternal side ("pull yourself up by your bootstraps").

Which is why balance is good.

Did the banks and Wall Street pull themselves up by their own bootstraps in 2007? Or did they get public assistance?

The Conservative argument appears to be, "Food Stamps are Socialism, but Corporate Bailouts are the American Way".

 

[KNB]

I think it's because women think on a different level than men. Most men think on a basis of logic and most women feel by emotion. It's only natural then that when the women meet matters of compassion they are naturally the first to equate to that compassion, their feelings take over, and then nature takes it's course. Before you know it, any woman who doesn't think things through is arguing for those things she sees as 'compassionate'.

Fwiw, I haven't met a woman yet who could think her way out of a paper bag.

It must have been a liberal woman who invaded Iraq. No exit strategy, no idea of how to win, no reason for the invasion in the first place. Obviously the work of emotional, reactionary liberal women.

 

[Iceman]

January 24, 2014 by CH


It’s hardly a secret that women vote more liberal and Democrat than do men. Even married women, while voting less liberal than their unmarried cohort, retain the sex disparity in vote preference. A study has found that suffrage moved the country inexorably to the left, and it hasn’t stopped moving in the degenerate direction since.

CH proposed a biological mechanism that follows from an understanding of the sexual market to explain the greater liberalism of women. As the resource-exploiting sex, women are neurally charged to extract support and transfer provisions from men to themselves to see them through the tough times of pregnancy and the raising of small children. To aid them in this purpose, women have evolved an innate (if subtly shifting) warmth for men who can provide for them and who show it through romantic displays of fidelity.

But when women become self-supporting, either by their own financial independence or via government largesse (which is in practice the redistribution of beta male resources to women), then the limbic impulses that help them connect with beta providers become short-circuited and redirected to charming cads and government growth. The cad serves the pile driver need while the sugar daddio big government serves the provider need. Under this arrangement, women can indeed “have it all”, (except for long-term commitment from men, which loses its incentive structure in this beta-bypass system).

Therefore, the liberalism of women is as much a consequence of their reliance on government serving as husband substitute as of their inherently greater sensitivity to perceived inequality or rifts in community cohesion. This theory gains traction by the evidence that married women become less liberal, ostensibly because their provider needs are being met by a real husband and the government has assumed the role of a malevolent outsider ransacking their intact family for tax money to be distributed to other women and their children.

All’s fair in souls and shivs, but this may be only part of the story of women’s infantile harm-based liberalism. The political and economic liberalism of women coexists with a greater female tendency to collectivism and religious feeling. Oddly, women appear to be both more liberal and more conservative than men, at least when the metrics used for comparison are sliced thinner. (And the hamster went wheeee….)

Read more here: Why Are Women More Liberal Than Men? | Chateau Heartiste

Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives | Psychology Today

Are Liberals Smarter? Study Indicates The Answer Is Yes -

Liberals and atheists smarter? Intelligent people have values novel in human evolutionary history, study finds

I wouldn't doubt that the average white liberal has a higher IQ than the average white conservative. I would like to see the racial breakdowns on your studies. If blacks and hispanics were included, who lean hard left, I would wager the IQ breakdown would be much different. Considering blacks and hispanics respectively score 15 and 10 points lower than Whites on IQ tests.

However, none of this has anything to do with this topic. If you want to make a discussion on race, political ideology and IQ, I would be happy to discuss the issue there.

This article is trying to explain the social trend of women of women supporting the left. I think a good part of that explanation lies in adaption and evolutionary biology. As nurturers, women see the extract the most resources they can for them and their offspring.

However, when these biological impulses of women are allowed to be expressed to the extreme, through a welfare state and women entering the work forces en masse, the state and the corporation supplant the male provider as the authority the women subject themselves to. This results in women relying on the government and the corporation more than the typical beta provider. They can extract resources from the corporation and state while fulfilling sexual needs with an alpha. However in the long run, this had resulted in less marriages, more sex outside of marriage, more children born out of wedlock, and declining birthrates, among other things.

 

[deltex1]

Because god created them in such a way so as to receive rather than give......not that there's anything wrong wid dat.

 

[Billy000]

January 24, 2014 by CH


It’s hardly a secret that women vote more liberal and Democrat than do men. Even married women, while voting less liberal than their unmarried cohort, retain the sex disparity in vote preference. A study has found that suffrage moved the country inexorably to the left, and it hasn’t stopped moving in the degenerate direction since.

CH proposed a biological mechanism that follows from an understanding of the sexual market to explain the greater liberalism of women. As the resource-exploiting sex, women are neurally charged to extract support and transfer provisions from men to themselves to see them through the tough times of pregnancy and the raising of small children. To aid them in this purpose, women have evolved an innate (if subtly shifting) warmth for men who can provide for them and who show it through romantic displays of fidelity.

But when women become self-supporting, either by their own financial independence or via government largesse (which is in practice the redistribution of beta male resources to women), then the limbic impulses that help them connect with beta providers become short-circuited and redirected to charming cads and government growth. The cad serves the pile driver need while the sugar daddio big government serves the provider need. Under this arrangement, women can indeed “have it all”, (except for long-term commitment from men, which loses its incentive structure in this beta-bypass system).

Therefore, the liberalism of women is as much a consequence of their reliance on government serving as husband substitute as of their inherently greater sensitivity to perceived inequality or rifts in community cohesion. This theory gains traction by the evidence that married women become less liberal, ostensibly because their provider needs are being met by a real husband and the government has assumed the role of a malevolent outsider ransacking their intact family for tax money to be distributed to other women and their children.

All’s fair in souls and shivs, but this may be only part of the story of women’s infantile harm-based liberalism. The political and economic liberalism of women coexists with a greater female tendency to collectivism and religious feeling. Oddly, women appear to be both more liberal and more conservative than men, at least when the metrics used for comparison are sliced thinner. (And the hamster went wheeee….)

Read more here: Why Are Women More Liberal Than Men? | Chateau Heartiste

Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives | Psychology Today

Are Liberals Smarter? Study Indicates The Answer Is Yes -

Liberals and atheists smarter? Intelligent people have values novel in human evolutionary history, study finds

I wouldn't doubt that the average white liberal has a higher IQ than the average white conservative. I would like to see the racial breakdowns on your studies. If blacks and hispanics were included, who lean hard left, I would wager the IQ breakdown would be much different. Considering blacks and hispanics respectively score 15 and 10 points lower than Whites on IQ tests.

However, none of this has anything to do with this topic. If you want to make a discussion on race, political ideology and IQ, I would be happy to discuss the issue there.

This article is trying to explain the social trend of women of women supporting the left. I think a good part of that explanation lies in adaption and evolutionary biology. As nurturers, women see the extract the most resources they can for them and their offspring.

However, when these biological impulses of women are allowed to be expressed to the extreme, through a welfare state and women entering the work forces en masse, the state and the corporation supplant the male provider as the authority the women subject themselves to. This results in women relying on the government and the corporation more than the typical beta provider. They can extract resources from the corporation and state while fulfilling sexual needs with an alpha. However in the long run, this had resulted in less marriages, more sex outside of marriage, more children born out of wedlock, and declining birthrates, among other things.

Why would I break the results down to race. What is the point?

 

[1776]

Many women rely on the goobermint for income via welfare, food stamps, birth control, etc especially after their man left them for another woman.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Many women rely on the goobermint for income via welfare, food stamps, birth control, etc especially after their man left them for another woman.

Yep,

Most of todays men don't care so that forces the woman to rely more on the government.

Part of the blame is on dead beats.

 

[1776]

Uh...most of them are liberal men.

Ghetto trash making 3-6 babies with multiple women voted for Obama, not Romney.

Many women rely on the goobermint for income via welfare, food stamps, birth control, etc especially after their man left them for another woman.

Yep,

Most of todays men don't care so that forces the woman to rely more on the government.

Part of the blame is on dead beats.

 

[deltex1]

They want public school to send children too
They want the college paid for
They want the food stamps for tough times

This is why

That's why they have a husband, Gertrude.