How’s the new job ?
Any injuries ??
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Why Allow Gun Ownership?
- Thread starter Lesh
- Start date
Any injuries ??
There's too many bears -------Don’t shoot bears
It’s just awful
How can you be so violent and cruel
And deer.
And since I keep sheep, don't get me started on wolves.
I can’t do it !!There's too many bears -------
And deer.
And since I keep sheep, don't get me started on wolves.
No way I could just shot one for no reason
They’re magnificent
- Aug 16, 2011
- 128,696
- 24,403
- 2,180
"Allow"? No one "allows" our rights as Americans. It is the height of presumptuous douche baggery to suggest otherwise.Why Allow Gun Ownership?
Because our country is sick in the head.
So they are. Okay, no bears.I can’t do it !!
No way I could just shot one for no reason
They’re magnificent
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 67,870
- 33,692
- 2,300
- Thread starter
- #246
A bunch of fat bastards with ARs isn’t gonna do shit about itThe contributions of the citizen soldiers mean nothing? Okay, whatever...
And who says the enemy has to be a foreign one? When Trump was president, y'all claimed he was a fascist. He wasn't even close, but what if a REAL fascist got into power? Wouldn't you want a means to fight back if he tries to make the military subdue the people?
- Aug 16, 2011
- 128,696
- 24,403
- 2,180
Not your call.I gave three reasons for owning guns.
None require assault rifles nor even semi auto weapons
Wrong.Who said we were defending our home against burglars?
Look at Ukraine, firearms in the hands of citizens are helping to stop the Russian invasion. THAT is why we need guns.
Reports from Ukrainian solders in the Donbas region indicate that small arms are used rarely, if at all.
This is a war of long-range artillery and missile attacks.
Likewise, American civilians with semi-automatic small arms would be useless against any modern military.
Your Red Dawn fantasy is just that – a fantasy, devoid of fact and merit.
Americans have the right to possess firearms for lawful self-defense, to defend against muggings and burglaries – not to ‘combat’ crime, not to ‘neutralize’ an active shooter, and not to ‘overthrow’ a foreign invader.
Confederate Soldier
Diamond Member
Confederate Soldier
Diamond Member
A bunch of fat bastards with ARs isn’t gonna do shit about it
Wait and see.
- May 17, 2013
- 68,143
- 33,172
- 2,290
Because Fuck youGet over the word “allow”.
It was meant that n the way that “have”would be used
In other words why do we HAVE guns…
It can be found here:Show me the word allow in the bill of rights?
“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER
Wrong.The contributions of the citizen soldiers mean nothing?
This is a lie – no one claimed any such thing.
Civilian resistance to foreign invasion would be similar to what the US military encountered in Iraq and Afghanistan – IEDs, bridges destroyed, other infrastructure disruption.
Indeed, the most effective firearms used against the US military in Afghanistan were K98s, M91/30s, and SMLEs employed by snipers – not relatively inaccurate semi-automatic firearms.
- May 17, 2013
- 68,143
- 33,172
- 2,290
Most hunting rifles are very effective semi auto weapons here. Every weapon has a use and range.Wrong.
This is a lie – no one claimed any such thing.
Civilian resistance to foreign invasion would be similar to what the US military encountered in Iraq and Afghanistan – IEDs, bridges destroyed, other infrastructure disruption.
Indeed, the most effective firearms used against the US military in Afghanistan were K98s, M91/30s, and SMLEs employed by snipers – not relatively inaccurate semi-automatic firearms.
Who is invading us that small arms would be ineffective?
Confederate Soldier
Diamond Member
Indeed, the most effective firearms used against the US military in Afghanistan were K98s, M91/30s, and SMLEs employed by snipers – not relatively inaccurate semi-automatic firearms.
That's what my 1898 Mauser with scope is for.
Looking here the professional liar chimes inIt can be found here:
“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER
www.law.cornell.edu
Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56
- May 17, 2013
- 68,143
- 33,172
- 2,290
You do it. Was a Dnc freak that did thisTell that to the parents in Texas
Similar threads
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 245
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 209
- Replies
- 31
- Views
- 986
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 622
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 149
- Replies
- 61
- Views
- 171
- Replies
- 122
- Views
- 767
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8149
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 472
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-