Why Allow Gun Ownership?

[Lesh]

You do it. Was a Dnc freak that did this

The **** he was.

 

[Blues Man]

1. Hunting

2. Target practice

3. Self defense

Case 1 does not require semi auto magazine fed. Certain cases (bear hunting or wild boar) require a handgun but large caliber revolvers serve that purpose.

2. That makes it a toy. A deadly toy

3. Certainly not a magazine fed semi auto. A shot gun is an excellent weapon for home defense.

So a magazine fed semiautomatic shotgun is OK

Cool

 

[Lesh]

So a magazine fed semiautomatic shotgun is OK

Cool

Why.

pump fed works fine for hunting and home defense

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why.

pump fed works fine for hunting and home defense

Most women can't handle a shotgun so keep your fascist opinion to yourself. What firearm works well is the one a person chooses. Not something you think they should have.

 

[Lesh]

Most women can't handle a shotgun so keep your fascist opinion to yourself. What firearm works well is the one a person chooses. Not something you think they should have.

And if you choose a machine gun??

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And if you choose a machine gun??

Now that's a failed red herring. If I wanted one I have that right to choose one they aren't illegal to own if you actually have knowledge of the subject.

 

[Lesh]

Now that's a failed red herring. If I wanted one I have that right to choose one they aren't illegal to own if you actually have knowledge of the subject.

Not true. Illegal if manufactured after 1986 and heavily regulated for this made previous to that.

Why would that be you might ask? Because they are exceedingly dangerous.

Ya know… like assault rifles

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Not true. Illegal if manufactured after 1986 and heavily regulated for this made previous to that.

Why would that be you might ask? Because they are exceedingly dangerous.

Ya know… like assault rifles

But they are legal to own yes they are.

 

[Lesh]

But they are legal to own yes they are.

Some are and are heavily regulated.

Again… why is that?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Some are and are heavily regulated.

Again… why is that?

But they are legal to own?

And if you choose a machine gun??

Over

 

[Lesh]

But they are legal to own?

Over

So tell us why machine guns are illegal/heavily regulated.

You failed to respond to that

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So tell us why machine guns are illegal/heavily regulated.

You failed to respond to that

That not what you asked
You keep moving the goal post machine guns are legal to own period. If I choose to have one I have that right.

 

[Lesh]

That not what you asked
You keep moving the goal post machine guns are legal to own period. If I choose to have one I have that right.

Only if you meet certain criteria and only if manufactured after 1986

 

[eagle1462010]

Only if you meet certain criteria and only if manufactured after 1986

If you would stop brainwashing kids this shit might stop.

We haf guns in our trucks when I grew up. No one cared.

Why have you retards screwed the young people so bad now. You suck

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Only if you meet certain criteria and only if manufactured after 1986

Repeat after me machine guns are legal to own.

 

[Blues Man]

Why.

pump fed works fine for hunting and home defense

You said shotguns were OK.

And what gives you the right to dictate to others what firearms they buy?

You buy whatever you want and MYOFB

 

[Lesh]

You said shotguns were OK.

And what gives you the right to dictate to others what firearms they buy?

You buy whatever you want and MYOFB

Including machine guns??

Why not?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Including machine guns??

Why not?

We've been through this already.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Most women can't handle a shotgun so keep your fascist opinion to yourself. What firearm works well is the one a person chooses. Not something you think they should have.

This is a lie.

Fascism is the sole purview of the right.

However misguided, ineffective, and unwarranted, AWBs are not un-Constitutional and not ‘anti-Second Amendment’ – the Supreme Court having never ruled on the constitutionality of AWBs.

And until the Court rules otherwise, AWBs are perfectly lawful, in no manner a manifestation of ‘fascism.’

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Most hunting rifles are very effective semi auto weapons here. Every weapon has a use and range.

Who is invading us that small arms would be ineffective?

A .30 caliber bolt action rifle would be the most effective firearm for American civilians opposing foreign invasion – not AR 15s.

The US military had the same experience in Vietnam as it did later in Iraq and Afghanistan – snipers armed with M91/30s; indeed, 10 – round fixed magazine SKSs were equally as effective because they could be loaded with stripper clips faster than an AK magazine.

A survey of the history of insurgent resistance to modern military invasions reveals few examples of civilian use of automatic or semi-automatic small arms; civilians lack the training and support to directly engage a modern military force. Indirect, long-range attacks are best suited for civilians, such as sniper attacks with bolt action rifles.