"Who won the election in 2020? Why are we still asking that queston, for goodness sake?"

... because she was his defense attorney, who should have out of professional understanding should not be the Orange Felon's AG.
That is silly. She advocated for him as a defendant, she can advocate for his voters as an Attorney General.

She’ll be an advocate, not a judge. Did you see some of the incredibly biased judges that Biden appointed?

Who better to carry out the will of the voters than someone trusted by the choice of the voters?
 
Last edited:
That is silly. She advocated for him as a defendant, she can advocate for his voters as an Attorney General.

She’ll be an advocate, not a judge. Did you see some of the incredibly biased judges that Biden appointed?

Who better to carry out the will of the voters than someone trusted by the choice of the voters?
You can't his federal and personal attorney.

It's a conflict.

The will of the voters is not to turn the resources and support of the DOJ to the President's personal needs.
 
So why bring it up at Bondi’s confirmation hearing? It wasn’t any part of her opening statement. If we can move on, why can’t you?

You haven’t moved on from the 2020 election
Just ask Trump
 
How did the “attack the voters” strategy work out for you in November?

Lost by 200,000 votes out of almost 150 million total votes.

You will lost the House in 2026 bigly and the charade of a Trump presidency will be exposed, yet again.
 
Lost by 200,000 votes out of almost 150 million total votes.
An electoral landslide.

Who would have thought Trump voters would still vote for him even though Democrats called them “deplorable garbage or whatever.
You will lost the House in 2026 bigly and the charade of a Trump presidency will be exposed, yet again.
We “will lost” the House?

Hopefully, we will have improved the public schools in those two years.
 
An electoral can be meaningless in the House, as it will show this term.

If the GOP does not 'nuke' cloture in the Senate, the MAGA is going to be unhappy with the votes.
 
Then there was no J6 “insurrection” or riot, just constitutionally protected protests and some criminals used a legitimate event as a cover for their criminal activity.

But in both instances violence occurred. One for under an hour with one perpetrator casualty and some broken doors and knocked over podiums… the other with 30+ dead, thousands severely injured, and billions in damage via arson and mob violence across the entire nation.

It’s safe to say the latter Is thousands of times worse than the former, yet leftists only focus on the pillow fight compared to the major battery
Well part of your problem contributing to why your argument (statement) is wrong is that you're comparing apples to oranges. When you say "in both instances violence occurred" you're intentionally misleading the reader into believing that Black Lives Matter were the ones committing the violence at their protests when we've already established that it was a group of criminals using the marches & protest as covers for their criminal acts.

Whereas the people who showed up at the Capitol in response to Trump's "call to action" went them specifically to express themselves in an angry & violent manner all for the purpose of interfering with (stopping) the certification of the election results. And they were successful in that they disrupted the proceedings and delayed the certification by what, half a day? And I don't know why you think that the J6 attack lasted for under an hour, that is patently false.

The first amendment prohibits, in part, the government interference in the rights of "....the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Therefore the difference between the Black Lives Matter alleged "riots" as you all call them is that the rioting was done by criminals not Black Lives Matter whereas the attack on the Capitol was done solely by the group referred to as J6ers with the express intent of making their displeasure with the election results known to our country's leaders and tried to prevent the lawful certification of the next president. The reason they have been found guilty in so many instances is the bolded red portion above that they failed to adhere to, which would have secured the protection of their activities under the first amendment. Their attempt to "petition the government for a redress of grievances" was not "peaceable". It was violent, they meant it to be violent and they also meant to instill fear in our congressional representatives and the Vice President of the United States.

This is one of the criminals committing crimes of violence under cover of one of the Black Lives Matter protest in downtown Seattle during the first weekend of the George Floyd protests. Margaret Aislinn Channon, a 26-year-old woman from Tacoma, Washington, was arrested on June 11, 2020, for setting fire to five Seattle Police Department vehicles during the George Floyd protests on May 30, 2020.:

1737196254619.webp
 
LOL And you're not bothered by the fact that every single member of Biden's administration and every single Dem in COngress lied to the American people for four straight years about his significant cognitive impairment?
The only way you can respond to my comment is to change the subject and make a false equivalency?
 
That is silly. She advocated for him as a defendant, she can advocate for his voters as an Attorney General.

She’ll be an advocate, not a judge. Did you see some of the incredibly biased judges that Biden appointed?

Who better to carry out the will of the voters than someone trusted by the choice of the voters?
So only the will of the Trump voters?
 
Whereas the people who showed up at the Capitol in response to Trump's "call to action" went them specifically to express themselves in an angry & violent manner all for the purpose of interfering with (stopping) the certification of the election results.
That’s impossible if Trump and all organizing demanded peaceful protest, which they did, So it seems you have your facts wrong.


 
explain why 90% of the voters showed in '20, Vs the usual 65 %......~S~
 
Not that Democrats want to believe they lost the last three presidential elections....but here's the proof:

 

Who won the election in 2020? Why are we still asking that queston, for goodness sake?"​


Because Republicans cannot erase history
They invented a lie to cover up their election loss.
That lie resulted in the Jan 6 attack on our Capitol

The fact that we still have Republicans who support that lie out of fear of Trump is relevant to their ability to serve our country
total horseshit. Jan 6 was american patriotic citizens demanding that our congress examine the evidence of vote fraud in the 2020 election. No one was injured except a female veteran who was unarmed and threatening no one, she was murdered by a capital cop who is walking free.

your dem/lib lies about Jan 6 have all been debunked and refuted. Stop lying about this.
 
As far as how bad GA elections go.....
 
Back
Top Bottom