WHO do you think makes up for Trump's corruption.........DUMBASS.That has NOTHING to do with this case or the asshole Dem's claims of fraud. Swing and a miss loser, try and cry harder.
Just like jitterbugs stealing from Walmart........WE do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
WHO do you think makes up for Trump's corruption.........DUMBASS.That has NOTHING to do with this case or the asshole Dem's claims of fraud. Swing and a miss loser, try and cry harder.
Come here you puny cranium Dem sheeple...explain why they reduced the absolute ridiculous bond, now run along juniorThe court that stated that the fine stands in full?
You seem a bit confused. It's not my fine. It's the orange slob"s fine.
There's no corruption liar, this is business. But feel free to explain why I and other taxpayers had to bail out General Motors to the tune of $53 BILLION dollars. Then how Obama ignored the law and stole the assets from the lawful bond holders and gifted 30% of the company to the unions. Leaving bond holders with nothing.WHO do you think makes up for Trump's corruption.........DUMBASS.
Just like jitterbugs stealing from Walmart........WE do.
The bank testified otherwise. Try actually seeing the evidence at your show trialsBS.
Trump Deceived Deutsche Bank, Former Exec Testifies
View attachment 924537
Mother Jones
https://www.motherjones.com › politics › 2023/10 › tru...
Oct 12, 2023 — A former Deutsche Bank executive testified this week that the German financial behemoth only agreed to make massive loans to Donald Trump ...
The banks are and were fine with Trump
The idiot vengeful know nothing judge has an agenda
Oh the Dem's ancestors felt that smack down. See how all the Dems ran and hid after.There's no corruption liar, this is business. But feel free to explain why I and other taxpayers had to bail out General Motors to the tune of $53 BILLION dollars. Then how Obama ignored the law and stole the assets from the lawful bond holders and gifted 30% of the company to the unions. Leaving bond holders with nothing.
OH SNAP! You are not capable of debating me boy, run along.
They reduced the bond because your orange God pleaded poverty. Duh. What a stupid question.Come here you puny cranium Dem sheeple...explain why they reduced the absolute ridiculous bond, now run along junior
There's no corruption liar, this is business. But feel free to explain why I and other taxpayers had to bail out General Motors to the tune of $53 BILLION dollars. Then how Obama ignored the law and stole the assets from the lawful bond holders and gifted 30% of the company to the unions. Leaving bond holders with nothing.
OH SNAP! You are not capable of debating me boy, run along.
Again, you lie! It's hilarious please continue. I have burst your Dem sheeple bubble and now you are losing your shit.They reduced the bond because your orange God pleaded poverty. Duh. What a stupid question.
GM bond holders with legal claims on GM assets, DEFRAUDED by Obama and the Democrats. Actual lawless fraud of the first order. We have to remind Democrats of their crimes. Sadly they were never prosecuted for this $53 BILLION dollars fraud.Poor teabagger.
That was the last teabagger that was installed as president.
Bush announces $17.4 billion auto bailout
Politico
https://www.politico.com › story › 2008/12 › bush-ann...
Dec 19, 2008 — President George W. Bush stepped in Friday to keep America's auto industry afloat, announcing a $17.4 billion bailout for GM and Chrysler, ...
https://www.politico.com/story/2008/12/bush-announces-174-billion-auto-bailout-016740
No, it's true. That's why you can't make any counterpoint and have degenerated once again into a quivering little toddler.Again, you lie! It's hilarious please continue. I have burst your Dem sheeple bubble and now you are losing your shit.
Sure they did.The bank testified otherwise. Try actually seeing the evidence at your show trials
I won't ignore the difference. I will state that such a difference does not change my counter-argument to the OP, which is that multi-billionaires are treated differently by banks than people with more typical income and assets. Not Donald Trump, specifically, but any multi-Billionaire, including George Soros, Bill Gates, and other heavy donors to the DNC.Because we aren't talking the appraisal for a home, not the property where the loan was taken out.
We are talking FPOTUS#45's personal guarantee on the loan based on his net worth through 500 shell companies.
In your/our home buyer situation you have two things happening:
FPOTUS#45's issue isn't the collateral value of the loan, his legal problems stem from - in his world - legal documents called "Statements of Financial Condition" showing his net worth as part of obtaining lower rates.
- The value of the property itself acting as collateral for the loan. That's why there is typically a down payment so that the collateral value exceeds the payoff value or the loan.
- The second factor is the interest * * RATE * * the lender will demand. In your/our case the lender is going to require things like pay slips, W-2's, X years tax returns, current balances on any financial accounts, etc. And of course the ever popular Credit Score.
But of course many will ignore this difference to rage that FPOTUS#45 is the victim.
WW
Trump nor anyone rich or poor is required by law to provide appraisal to the lenderThat sounds like a question for whoever said that New York has a law in place and lets rich people not have a certified appraisal done.
Did the bank not know that Trump did not have a certified appraisal done? If that is your point? I really have no idea what your point is to be honest with you. Why don’t you just you know tell us what your point is.
That is a very common practice and it is one of those rare cases in which a typical buyer/taxpayer can take advantage of the system.What about telling the DMV the value of a used car? I told them it was half the bluebook value, and they accepted it. Saved a bunch on the sales tax.
Does that count?
At the trial! Geez manSure they did.
WHEN?
In what the rest of us call reality, Trump was indeed required to provide financial statements that contained property valuations.Trump nor anyone rich or poor is required by law to provide appraisal to the lender
Leftists are tarded. To think these people laugh at flat earthers. They do that and everything else as they're told, because they cannot think for themselves.And what State lets you do that if yes.
Asking for a friend. Because I really want to understand this Trump accusation and “my friend” may want to move to your State if you don’t need to involve outside appraisals.
Why Trump’s Alleged Real-Estate Shenanigans Went Too Far
You can get away with a lot when appraising property. But not this much.slate.com
Is Jon Stewart in prison?In what the rest of us call reality, Trump was indeed required to provide financial statements that contained property valuations.
He was also required to attest to the accuracy of these statements under penalty of law.
He chose to commit several felonies.